Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Futuro del sector de la biotecnología y la biofabricación de la Unión: sacar provecho de la investigación, impulsar la innovación y mejorar la competitividad

Hildegard Bentele - Propuesta de Resolución (conjunto del texto)
Fecha: 10.07.2025·Referencia: A10-0123/2025
Ponente: Hildegard Bentele

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 494 A favor
  • 83 En contra
  • 71 Abstención
  • 71 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 500 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2025/2008(INI) · INI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión57 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión102 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Último documentado: Pleno500 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (8)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  4. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  5. Presentación al pleno
  6. Presentación al pleno
  7. Votación en el pleno
  8. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Biotecnología y bioproducción sectores estratégicos para competitividad.
  • Exigencia de simplificación de procedimientos de autorización y acto legislativo.
  • Fortalecimiento de la autonomía estratégica mediante bioeconomía sostenible.
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (5)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 1Rechazada

    Citation 2 a (new)

    Presentada por Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri +71 · Members

    Añadido: – having regard to the UN Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights;

  2. Enmienda 2Rechazada

    Recital S a (new)

    Presentada por Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri +71 · Members

    Añadido: Sa. whereas such a framework and the ethical foundation of the EU should be based on core values such as the inviolability of human dignity, the integrity of the person, the primacy of the human being over the sole interests of science or industry, the prohibition of reproductive cloning and eugenic practices, the requirement of free and informed consent for any medical intervention, the prohibition of financial profit from the human body and its parts, the non-patentability of living human matter, and the rejection of discrimination based on genetic characteristics; whereas this must include, among other things, strict compliance with rules on genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the prohibition of certain biotechnological practices deemed incompatible with human dignity and characteristics of human species and sexes, safeguards concerning the prohibition of enhancement of human embryos and germ cells, regulations on the use of stem cells and synthetic gametes, prior authorisation procedures for clinical and medical applications, transparency obligations and requirements for the protection of genetic data; whereas the Member States must retain the right to adopt more restrictive measures in the field of bioethics, without such measures being regarded as obstacles to the functioning of the internal market or to the development of the EU’s industrial strategy;

  3. Enmienda 3Rechazada

    Paragraph 1

    Presentada por Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri +71 · Members

    … biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector and the need for the EU to remain Eliminado: world-leading in this field; Añadido: world leading in these fields; underlines the commitment to the principles of better regulation and lawmaking, simplification and administrative burden reduction; underlines Eliminado: that the simplification of EU legislation must not endanger any of Añadido: the importance of always protecting the fundamental rights of citizens, workers and Eliminado: businesses or risk regulatory uncertainty; believes that any simplification proposal should not be rushed and proposed without proper consideration, consultation and impact assessments; Añadido: businesses; therefore asks the Commission, if Eliminado: it proposes a new EU-wide regulation in the form of an EU Eliminado: biotech act, Añadido: Biotech Act is proposed, to address concrete gaps and shortcomings in current legislation and implementation, and to present legislation that can be revised, simplified, streamlined, repealed Eliminado: and which reduces bureaucratic burdens, Añadido: or by which bureaucratic burden can be reduced, focusing on the specificities of the industry and maintaining relevant safety and security Eliminado: standards; Añadido: standards of quality and safety, while also being consistent with bioethics and human dignity; asks that an EU Eliminado: biotech act Añadido: Biotech Act adopt a comprehensive cross-sectoral scope and that it be accompanied by an … scale-ups, as well as the interaction with other relevant legislative and non-legislative Eliminado: initiatives, Añadido: initiatives including proposals currently undergoing the co-legislative procedure; Añadido: calls, in any case, on the Commission to review EU legislation that may affect the sector in order to identify potential barriers to the industry and to carry out the necessary amendments to or repeals of EU legislation, including those stemming from the European Green Deal;

  4. Enmienda 4Rechazada

    Paragraph 8

    Presentada por Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri +71 · Members

    … self-sufficiency in key feedstocks, raw materials and components; recalls the precautionary principle Eliminado: laid down in Article 191 TFEU; Eliminado: urges the Commission Añadido: stresses, however, that an approach disproportionately focused on environmental impact, without taking into account economic and social factors, has already caused harm in other industrial sectors; calls on the Commission to carry out a well-designed impact assessment to ensure that the new biotechnology strategy is a driver of growth and innovation, rather than a generator of unnecessary obstacles; urges the Commission, furthermore, to share with Parliament the preliminary findings of its study on regulatory Eliminado: burden, in this regard, Añadido: burden and the potential need to review legislation related to biotechnology and biomanufacturing; … access, while maintaining a risk- and science-based approach and avoiding regulatory uncertainty; Añadido: stresses, nevertheless, that such regulatory simplification must under no circumstances come at the expense of the Member States’ bioethics rules;

  5. Enmienda 5Rechazada

    Paragraph 26 a (new)

    Presentada por Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri +71 · Members

    Añadido: 26a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the proposal on biotechnology is in line with principles such as the respect for life and the protection of human dignity, and to guarantee that all efforts in the fields of innovation and regulatory simplification remain compatible with the highest standards of human dignity and public health; stresses that any restrictive measure adopted by a Member State on bioethical grounds – whether concerning the use of genetic engineering, synthetic biology or the manipulation of sensitive biological material – must not be regarded as an obstacle to the integration of the internal market or to industrial development, but rather as the legitimate expression of a national constitutional identity, public order and sovereign ethical choices, in accordance with Union law and the principle of subsidiarity; supports a regulatory approach based on the precautionary principle and a commitment to high ethical standards, in contrast with the product-based, innovation-driven frameworks; insists that, due to its sensitive nature, the biotechnology sector requires a principle of ethical risk assessment to ensure a balanced approach between innovation and competitiveness, freedom of research, respect for human dignity and the protection of populations;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 719

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
AlemaniaEPP
A favor
EsloveniaRenew
A favor
FranciaEPP
A favor
EslovaquiaRenew
A favor
MaltaS&D
A favor
AlemaniaGreens/EFA
A favor
PoloniaEPP
A favor
EstoniaEPP
A favor
PoloniaEPP
A favor
Países BajosEPP
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en