Vote au Parlement européen
L'avenir du secteur des biotechnologies et de la bioproduction dans l'UE: mettre la recherche à contribution, stimuler l'innovation et accroître la compétitivité
Résultat global
Adopté- 494 Pour
- 83 Contre
- 71 Abstention
- 71 N'a pas voté
Comment nous comptons
- Les votes Pour, Contre et Abstention proviennent du procès-verbal de vote nominal du Parlement européen.
- « N'a pas voté » est déduit : députés avec un mandat le jour du vote pour lesquels aucun vote n'est enregistré. Les abstentions ne comptent pas pour cela.
- Les corrections de vote ultérieures sont affichées mais ne modifient pas le résultat officiel.
- Chaque vote (vote global, amendement, vote partiel) compte séparément. C'est pourquoi les totaux peuvent différer des pages qui comptent différemment.
Statut et procédure
Résultat tel qu'enregistré par le Parlement européen.
- Vote du
- Dernière étape documentée
- Plénière · (il y a 500 jours)
- Prochaine étape prévue
- Aucune autre étape n'est prévue dans la source.
Déroulement de la procédure
2025/2008(INI) · INI
Activités documentées de la procédure. Elles ne prouvent pas qu’une loi est entrée en vigueur.
- Documenté: Renvoi
- Documenté: Examen en commission
- Dernier documenté: Plénière
Activités documentées (8)
- Renvoi en commission
- Dépôt du rapport en commission
- Dépôt d’amendements en commission
- Adoption du rapport en commission
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Dépôt en séance plénière
- Vote en séance plénière
- Résultats du vote en séance plénière
Activités prévues (réalisation non confirmée)
- Vote en séance plénière
Fiche de procédure (OEIL) · Données du Parlement européen
Consulté le:
Sources
Données : EP Open Data API
De quoi s’agit-il ?
- Biotechnologie et bioproduction secteurs stratégiques pour la compétitivité.
- Exigence de simplification des procédures d'autorisation et acte législatif.
- Renforcement de l’ autonomie stratégique via bioéconomie durable.
Historique des amendements (5)
Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais.
- Amendement 1Rejeté
Citation 2 a (new)
Déposé par Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri +71 · Members
Ajouté: – having regard to the UN Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights;
- Amendement 2Rejeté
Recital S a (new)
Déposé par Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri +71 · Members
Ajouté: Sa. whereas such a framework and the ethical foundation of the EU should be based on core values such as the inviolability of human dignity, the integrity of the person, the primacy of the human being over the sole interests of science or industry, the prohibition of reproductive cloning and eugenic practices, the requirement of free and informed consent for any medical intervention, the prohibition of financial profit from the human body and its parts, the non-patentability of living human matter, and the rejection of discrimination based on genetic characteristics; whereas this must include, among other things, strict compliance with rules on genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the prohibition of certain biotechnological practices deemed incompatible with human dignity and characteristics of human species and sexes, safeguards concerning the prohibition of enhancement of human embryos and germ cells, regulations on the use of stem cells and synthetic gametes, prior authorisation procedures for clinical and medical applications, transparency obligations and requirements for the protection of genetic data; whereas the Member States must retain the right to adopt more restrictive measures in the field of bioethics, without such measures being regarded as obstacles to the functioning of the internal market or to the development of the EU’s industrial strategy;
- Amendement 3Rejeté
Paragraph 1
Déposé par Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri +71 · Members
… biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector and the need for the EU to remain
Supprimé: world-leading in this field;Ajouté: world leading in these fields; underlines the commitment to the principles of better regulation and lawmaking, simplification and administrative burden reduction; underlinesSupprimé: that the simplification of EU legislation must not endanger any ofAjouté: the importance of always protecting the fundamental rights of citizens, workers andSupprimé: businesses or risk regulatory uncertainty; believes that any simplification proposal should not be rushed and proposed without proper consideration, consultation and impact assessments;Ajouté: businesses; therefore asks the Commission, ifSupprimé: it proposesa new EU-wide regulation in the form of an EUSupprimé: biotech act,Ajouté: Biotech Act is proposed, to address concrete gaps and shortcomings in current legislation and implementation, and to present legislation that can be revised, simplified, streamlined, repealedSupprimé: and which reduces bureaucratic burdens,Ajouté: or by which bureaucratic burden can be reduced, focusing on the specificities of the industry and maintaining relevant safety and securitySupprimé: standards;Ajouté: standards of quality and safety, while also being consistent with bioethics and human dignity; asks that an EUSupprimé: biotech actAjouté: Biotech Act adopt a comprehensive cross-sectoral scope and that it be accompanied by an … scale-ups, as well as the interaction with other relevant legislative and non-legislativeSupprimé: initiatives,Ajouté: initiatives including proposals currently undergoing the co-legislative procedure; Ajouté: calls, in any case, on the Commission to review EU legislation that may affect the sector in order to identify potential barriers to the industry and to carry out the necessary amendments to or repeals of EU legislation, including those stemming from the European Green Deal; - Amendement 4Rejeté
Paragraph 8
Déposé par Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri +71 · Members
… self-sufficiency in key feedstocks, raw materials and components; recalls the precautionary principle
Supprimé: laid downin Article 191 TFEU;Supprimé: urges the CommissionAjouté: stresses, however, that an approach disproportionately focused on environmental impact, without taking into account economic and social factors, has already caused harm in other industrial sectors; calls on the Commission to carry out a well-designed impact assessment to ensure that the new biotechnology strategy is a driver of growth and innovation, rather than a generator of unnecessary obstacles; urges the Commission, furthermore, to share with Parliament the preliminary findings of its study on regulatorySupprimé: burden, in this regard,Ajouté: burden and the potential need to review legislation related to biotechnology and biomanufacturing; … access, while maintaining a risk- and science-based approach and avoiding regulatory uncertainty; Ajouté: stresses, nevertheless, that such regulatory simplification must under no circumstances come at the expense of the Member States’ bioethics rules; - Amendement 5Rejeté
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Déposé par Viktória Ferenc, Kinga Gál, Enikő Győri +71 · Members
Ajouté: 26a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the proposal on biotechnology is in line with principles such as the respect for life and the protection of human dignity, and to guarantee that all efforts in the fields of innovation and regulatory simplification remain compatible with the highest standards of human dignity and public health; stresses that any restrictive measure adopted by a Member State on bioethical grounds – whether concerning the use of genetic engineering, synthetic biology or the manipulation of sensitive biological material – must not be regarded as an obstacle to the integration of the internal market or to industrial development, but rather as the legitimate expression of a national constitutional identity, public order and sovereign ethical choices, in accordance with Union law and the principle of subsidiarity; supports a regulatory approach based on the precautionary principle and a commitment to high ethical standards, in contrast with the product-based, innovation-driven frameworks; insists that, due to its sensitive nature, the biotechnology sector requires a principle of ethical risk assessment to ensure a balanced approach between innovation and competitiveness, freedom of research, respect for human dignity and the protection of populations;
Vote par groupe politique
Comment les groupes politiques ont voté
- 5Pour
- 11Contre
- 9Abstention
- 5N'a pas voté
- 173Pour
- 1Contre
- 0Abstention
- 14N'a pas voté
- 68Pour
- 0Contre
- 0Abstention
- 7N'a pas voté
- 113Pour
- 2Contre
- 0Abstention
- 21N'a pas voté
- 47Pour
- 2Contre
- 1Abstention
- 3N'a pas voté
- 65Pour
- 8Contre
- 2Abstention
- 4N'a pas voté
- 11Pour
- 26Contre
- 0Abstention
- 9N'a pas voté
- 11Pour
- 10Contre
- 57Abstention
- 7N'a pas voté
- 1Pour
- 23Contre
- 2Abstention
- 1N'a pas voté
Les membres
Montrer 10 de 719
| Nom | Pays | Groupe | Position de vote |
|---|---|---|---|
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour | |||
Pour |