EN
ItalianoVote in the European Parliament
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize MON 87427, pursuant to Regulation No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Motion for a resolution
Date: 25.11.2025Reference: B10-0491/2025transgenic plantimplementing decisionfood inspectionfood safetyanimal feedingstuffspesticide residuemaizefoodstuffmarket approval
Overall Result
Adopted- 426 For
- 157 Against
- 17 Abstention
- 119 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (353 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2897(RSP) · RSP
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (2)
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The renewal of authorization for genetically modified maize MON 87427 is contested due to risks linked to glyphosate tolerance and insufficient long-term studies.
- While EFSA found no new hazards, cumulative effects and ecological impacts remain unaddressed.
- The Parliament urges the Commission to withdraw the proposal and prioritize the precautionary principle.
- A reform of the GMO approval process is demanded to address democratic shortcomings.
- International commitments, such as the Paris Agreement, should guide the decision-making process.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For25
- 25For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For53
- 53For
- 13Against
- 0Abstention
- 13Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For34
- 34For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 12Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For106
- 106For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 26Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For53
- 53For
- 105Against
- 3Abstention
- 27Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For45
- 45For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For61
- 61For
- 4Against
- 9Abstention
- 11Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For30
- 30For
- 35Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For19
- 19For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Lithuania | ECR | For | |
 Greece | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Spain | S&D | For | |
 Belgium | S&D | For | |
 Poland | S&D | For | |
| Poland | ECR | For | |
 France | S&D | For | |
 Slovenia | EPP | For | |
 Germany | S&D | For | |
 Netherlands | Greens/EFA | For |
