Vote in the European Parliament

Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism

Antonio Decaro – After recital 29 – Am 9
Date: 22.05.2025·Reference: A10-0085/2025
Rapporteur: Antonio Decaro

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 171 For
  • 414 Against
  • 9 Abstention
  • 125 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 9 · Tabled by ECRView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Aurelijus Veryga, Adrian-George Axinia, Kosma Złotowski, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Dominik Tarczyński, Diego Solier, Nora Junco García, Daniel Obajtek, Marion Maréchal, Laurence Trochu, Nicolas Bay, Guillaume Peltier, Georgiana Teodorescu, Alexandr Vondra, Ondřej Krutílek

Added: (29 a) It is necessary to ensure effective implementation of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and to address the remaining regulatory loopholes, which result in circumvention of the established rules and, in consequence, put European production at risk of competitive disadvantage. It is therefore necessary to address the regulatory loopholes, through strict oversight and monitoring of CBAM application, in order to ensure a level playing field between European producers of CBAM goods and third country producers and effectively reduce global emissions.

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE772.580

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (392 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/0039(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage4 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral8 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage36 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Plenary8 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Negotiations42 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Committee stage61 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Plenary36 days until the next step
  8. Recorded: Signature9 days until the next step
  9. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (30)
  1. Committee opinion tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee opinion adopted
  6. Committee opinion adopted
  7. Committee report adopted
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Tabling for plenary
  17. Plenary debate
  18. Text amended in plenary
  19. Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
  20. Plenary vote
  21. Plenary vote results
  22. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  23. Tabling for plenary
  24. Tabling for plenary
  25. Plenary debate
  26. Parliament’s first-reading position
  27. Plenary vote
  28. Plenary vote results
  29. Signature
  30. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary debate
  4. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Simplification of CBAM system proposed.
  • Exceptions for electricity imports from EEA economic zones.
  • Rapporteur Antonio Decaro leads process.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
SwedenEPP
Intended voteAgainstSubmitted vote: For
GermanyNI
For
FrancePfE
For
CzechiaECR
For
CzechiaPfE
For
BelgiumPfE
For
ItalyECR
For
ItalyECR
For
GreeceECR
For
GermanyESN
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en