Vote in the European Parliament

Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism

Antonio Decaro – After recital 27 – Am 13
Date: 22.05.2025·Reference: A10-0085/2025
Rapporteur: Antonio Decaro

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 114 For
  • 424 Against
  • 51 Abstention
  • 130 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 13 · Tabled by ECRView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Patryk Jaki, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Dominik Tarczyński, Kosma Złotowski, Piotr Müller

Added: (27 a) Coking coal is a critical raw material of strategic importance for European industry, which underpins the green and digital transition. Listed under Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, coking coal is of a strategic importance for the overall Union economy, and therefore its internal European production should be promoted. Imports of coking coal from third countries with less stringent environmental legislation in place negatively impact the European domestic production of coking coal and places European producers at a competitive disadvantage and risks undermining Union's climate and industrial objectives. In order to ensure the level playing field between the European production of coking coal and its imports from third countries, the Commission should present, as part of its assessment referred to in Article 30(2) the possibility to extend the scope of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 to cover the coking coal sector. 1a Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020 (OJ L 1252, 3.5.2024, p.1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/2024-05-03).

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE772.580

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (392 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/0039(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage4 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral8 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage36 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Plenary8 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Negotiations42 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Committee stage61 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Plenary36 days until the next step
  8. Recorded: Signature9 days until the next step
  9. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (30)
  1. Committee opinion tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee opinion adopted
  6. Committee opinion adopted
  7. Committee report adopted
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Tabling for plenary
  17. Plenary debate
  18. Text amended in plenary
  19. Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
  20. Plenary vote
  21. Plenary vote results
  22. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  23. Tabling for plenary
  24. Tabling for plenary
  25. Plenary debate
  26. Parliament’s first-reading position
  27. Plenary vote
  28. Plenary vote results
  29. Signature
  30. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary debate
  4. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Simplification of CBAM system proposed.
  • Exceptions for electricity imports from EEA economic zones.
  • Rapporteur Antonio Decaro leads process.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
PolandEPP
For
CzechiaECR
For
PolandECR
For
PolandEPP
For
SpainPfE
Intended voteAbstentionSubmitted vote: For
CzechiaECR
For
FranceECR
For
PolandEPP
For
PolandEPP
For
CzechiaPfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en