Vote in the European Parliament

Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanism

Antonio Decaro – After recital 1 – Am 18
Date: 22.05.2025·Reference: A10-0085/2025
Rapporteur: Antonio Decaro

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 171 For
  • 407 Against
  • 5 Abstention
  • 136 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 18 · Tabled by PfEView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Filip Turek, Silvia Sardone, Ondřej Knotek, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Mathilde Androuët, Viktória Ferenc, Jana Nagyová, Roberto Vannacci, Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain

Added: (1 b) The Union is the only major region in the world to have introduced a significant price on CO2, but the incentive effect of such a carbon pricing on trading partners has not been clearly demonstrated. The introduction of the CBAM is causing concerns among Union economic actors, particularly the energy-intensive industries already pressured by the Union's excessive environmental legislation. In the context of the comprehensive review, the Commission will remove the phase-out of the free allowances under the EU ETS if a level playing field is not ensured.

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE772.580

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (392 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/0039(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage4 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral8 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage36 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Plenary8 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Negotiations42 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Committee stage61 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Plenary36 days until the next step
  8. Recorded: Signature9 days until the next step
  9. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (30)
  1. Committee opinion tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee opinion adopted
  6. Committee opinion adopted
  7. Committee report adopted
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Tabling for plenary
  17. Plenary debate
  18. Text amended in plenary
  19. Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
  20. Plenary vote
  21. Plenary vote results
  22. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  23. Tabling for plenary
  24. Tabling for plenary
  25. Plenary debate
  26. Parliament’s first-reading position
  27. Plenary vote
  28. Plenary vote results
  29. Signature
  30. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary debate
  4. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Simplification of CBAM system proposed.
  • Exceptions for electricity imports from EEA economic zones.
  • Rapporteur Antonio Decaro leads process.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
FrancePfE
For
FrancePfE
For
NetherlandsPfE
For
PortugalPfE
For
ItalyECR
For
GermanyESN
For
PolandPfE
For
PolandECR
For
FranceECR
For
FrancePfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en