Vote in the European Parliament

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report – annual report 2025

Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 185 – Am 12
Date: 29.04.2026·Reference: A10-0091/2026
Rapporteur: Konstantinos Arvanitis

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 185 For
  • 426 Against
  • 13 Abstention
  • 95 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 12 · Tabled by PfEView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Petra Steger, Marieke Ehlers, Jorge Buxadé Villalba

185. Removed: Reiterates the findings and recommendations of its resolution of 25 November 2025 on the proposal for a Council decision determining, pursuant to Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union, the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded; takes note that the Commission has initiated an infringement procedure against Hungary for failure to comply with several provisions of the EMFA, as well as certain requirements under the Audiovisual Media Services Directives; underlines that, in her Opinion in Case C-829/24, Commission v Hungary, Advocate General Juliane Kokott considered that Hungary had infringed EU law by adopting legislation on the protection of national sovereignty, which may undermine fundamental Union principles, in particular regarding protection against foreign political interference; underlines that, in her Opinion in Case C-225/24, Parliament v Commission, Advocate General Tamara Ćapeta proposed that the CJEU annuls the Commission’s decision to lift the suspension of EU funds to Hungary, thereby raising concerns regarding compliance with Added: Expresses grave concern that rule of law Removed: conditionality; Added: mechanisms, including Article 7 proceedings and the Conditionality Regulation, risk being instrumentalised to exert political pressure on Member States whose policies diverge from particular political or ideological preferences, rather than being applied objectively on the basis of genuine violations of Article 2 TEU values; calls on the Commission to refrain from using the rule of law framework as a pretext to interfere in policy areas that fall within Member State competence;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.226v01-00

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (211 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2239(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage10 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Referral18 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Committee stage122 days until the next step
  4. Latest recorded: Plenary211 days since this step began
Recorded activities (14)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Referral to committee
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee opinion adopted
  6. Committee report adopted
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Plenary debate
  13. Plenary vote
  14. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Rule of Law Report 2025 highlights systemic deficiencies in EU states.
  • Demand for independent judiciary and anti-corruption measures in member countries.
  • Conditionality of EU funds in case of violations of EU values.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
NetherlandsPfE
For
PolandESN
For
PolandECR
For
ItalyECR
For
HungaryPfE
For
FrancePfE
For
FranceECR
For
GermanyNI
For
BulgariaESN
For
SlovakiaESN
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en