Vote in the European Parliament
REPORT on copyright and generative artificial intelligence – opportunities and challenges
Date: 10.03.2026Reference: A10-0019/2026Overall Result
Adopted- 460 For
- 71 Against
- 88 Abstention
- 99 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (261 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2058(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (8)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Copyright protection for generative AI content mandatory.
- Transparency obligations for AI providers on training data.
- Fair remuneration for rights holders via licensing framework.
Amendment history (2)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Recital H a (new)
Tabled by Pascale Piera, Jordan Bardella, Mathilde Androuët +76 · Members
Added: Ha. whereas artistic creations protected by copyright can effectively be copied and used illegally by these new technologies; whereas these difficulties should be addressed while ensuring the competitiveness of European companies in the AI sector; whereas the measures to be put in place should not hinder the economic development of this sector;
- Amendment 2Rejected
Paragraph 3
Tabled by Pascale Piera, Jordan Bardella, Mathilde Androuët +75 · Members
… the concept of ‘lawful access’ excludes pirated and infringing copies of works; Added: recalls that, in the EU, the cultural sector represents nearly 4 % of GDP and that nearly eight million people are employed in this sector, which comprises more than one million businesses that may be affected, to varying degrees, by the use of creative works without compensation by generative AI;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 18For
- 0Against
- 5Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 119For
- 3Against
- 0Abstention
- 13Did not vote
- 62For
- 1Against
- 4Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 1For
- 17Against
- 46Abstention
- 20Did not vote
- 151For
- 9Against
- 3Abstention
- 23Did not vote
- 40For
- 0Against
- 7Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 33For
- 25Against
- 15Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 34For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 2For
- 16Against
- 4Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
Intended voteAbstentionSubmitted vote: For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |