Vote in the European Parliament
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the draft Commission Implementing Decision authorising the placing on the market of food, food ingredients and feed produced from genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Motion for a resolution
Date: 16.12.2025Reference: B10-0559/2025health controllabellinganimal feedingstuffsgenetically modified organismroot vegetablemarket approvalhuman nutritionmarketing standardconsumer information
Overall Result
Adopted- 455 For
- 169 Against
- 8 Abstention
- 87 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (332 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2959(RSP) · RSP
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (2)
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The resolution addresses the proposed authorization of genetically modified sugar beet variety KWS20-1 for food and feed, which is resistant to herbicides like glyphosate, dicamba, and glufosinate.
- Concerns are raised about the lack of long-term studies on toxicological effects and cumulative impacts of pesticide residues.
- The increased use of complementary herbicides may accelerate resistance in weeds, harming soil health and biodiversity.
- The authorization conflicts with EU sustainability commitments and the precautionary principle.
- The Parliament urges the Commission to withdraw the proposal due to insufficient evidence of safety.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For26
- 26For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
For58
- 58For
- 11Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
For63
- 63For
- 13Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
For116
- 116For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 17Did not vote
For21
- 21For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
For47
- 47For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
For28
- 28For
- 34Against
- 1Abstention
- 12Did not vote
For56
- 56For
- 109Against
- 4Abstention
- 19Did not vote
For40
- 40For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |