Vote in the European Parliament

Competition policy – annual report 2024

Lara Wolters – After § 8 – Am 1
Date: 08.05.2025·Reference: A10-0071/2025
Rapporteur: Lara Wolters

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 105 For
  • 290 Against
  • 161 Abstention
  • 163 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 1 · Tabled by The LeftView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Added: 8a. Expresses its profound disapproval at the decision by the ArcelorMittal Group to cut up to 1 400 jobs in western Europe, almost half of them in France; deplores the plan to relocate some of these jobs to India and Poland; stresses that the group nevertheless made a profit of EUR 1.3 billion and paid out more than EUR 1.5 billion to its shareholders in 2024; recalls that over recent years ArcelorMittal has received several billion euros in public support from the European Union and from Member States, including France; calls on the Commission and the Member States to take measures to ensure that companies benefiting from public support cannot, as ArcelorMittal is doing, close industrial sites, draw up redundancy plans, relocate their activities, pay dividends to their shareholders and renounce their green transition objectives; considers that current European law significantly hampers the ability of Member States to bring strategic companies or sectors of public interest under public control; calls therefore on the Commission to propose a revision of EU competition rules; urges the French government to nationalise the company in order to protect workers and preserve steelmaking as a strategic industry;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE772.536v01-00

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (577 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2079(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral13 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage125 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary577 days since this step began
Recorded activities (12)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Plenary debate
  11. Plenary vote
  12. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Strengthening competitiveness through innovation and sustainability.
  • Demand for reforms in state aid and merger control.
  • Focus on digital markets and market concentration in key sectors.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
RomaniaEPP
For
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
SpainGUE/NGL
For
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
ItalyGUE/NGL
For
ItalyGUE/NGL
For
SwedenGreens/EFA
For
GreeceNI
For
FranceGUE/NGL
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en