What Christian spoke about.

Commissioner, I mean, that is well intended, but it is totally unrealistic because you put the burden on the shoulders of Member States. But what you say to Algeria, what you say to the exporters, it is a matter of investments of a certain dimension, it is a matter of time to install that technically. And we are going to sit here next year, so to pretend it is the Member State to solve that within

Madam President, Commissioner Jørgensen! The Methane Regulation is once again a typical example of the past legislature: Well-intentioned, but with a massive impact on competitiveness and energy security. In a nutshell, one can say: The prerequisites for the equivalent measurement and avoidance of methane are simply not in place in many countries from which we source oil and gas as of 2027. In thi

Mr President, before I start, to put some things into proportion: in Germany, the biggest net payer in Europe, the average taxpayer pays EUR 240 for Europe a year. EUR 240. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't spend money properly, but we should put that in proportion. And I don't want to go into this shame‑and‑blame game, but Poland is a net‑receiver country. And for good reason, because the Germa

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, it might be a little bit of a strange expression, but sometimes I feel that the President of the European Commission is the only man in the room. I mean, what we talk about is – and I am looking to the Council on Thursday – we need a deepening of the European market. We don't have to repair. We don't have to repeat what we had been formulating in the trenches

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Commissioners, I think the privilege of the EPP is that Siegfried Mureşan has been laying down the policies of a united EPP. We're not advocating our little things; we're looking for a balanced budget, indeed looking for the clarity of the budget. We're granting, and we do think, that more of the same might not be the future. We have to grant flexibility, but

Madam President, Commissioners – and I use the gender neutral plural and very much welcome that we are talking to two Commissioners because the exercise we're going to undertake needs a collaborative effort from the Commission. I could also address DG ENER, where these days we are negotiating a low carbon hydrogen act, which will also be decisive for the chemical industry, and I hope it will help

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, I think Choose Europe for Science, the initiative announced by President von der Leyen, is an important signal for Europe and the world, but luckily it had been accompanied also by a press conference where the President had been announcing that there will be a stand‑alone research programme, which necessarily is the base for that ambition. I thi

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, Commissioner! Allow me to speak in German. Russia continues to finance its war machine through energy exports in the third year of the terrible war of aggression against Ukraine. Even though the Russian aGents of interest In this debate, too, we will try to argue differently. That is why it is important for Ukraine, and thus for the entire European Union, to dra

Perhaps an objectification after the apologists of doom will help. Mr President, Commissioner! We must... the proposals now on the table from the Commission are, I believe, an enrichment of CBAM, which is necessary, which is also good, and the de minimis rule will help many. But we still have to think a bit about the design of CBAM. So, of course, there is the question of what defines the extent t

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, the next MFF must be a game changer for European industrial competitiveness. This begins with the understanding that competitiveness is the ability to compete in markets based on a combination of price and quality, so not picking winners and losers by state-driven industrial policy. To compete on price, Europe must level the global playing field wh

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, let's end the discussion a little bit on a positive tone. I think there is some air of realism, and the energy-intensive industries are the core and the backbone of the European industries. On the other hand, decarbonisation is a generational task and it is also leading to new investments and it's also based on new technologies, and Europe needs that. On the

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen. I believe that in difficult times today the Steel Act A good sign. However, when I see our friends from the AfD, whose populist friends in America are leading the world into a protectionist war, then you see what the industrial policy promises of the right mean internationally. When populists rule America, we plunge the world into a world trade war. I wonder

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen! After 100 days of the new Commission, it is clear: The Commission is delivering – under the heading of competitiveness – what the Commissioner is addressing today is what we have been cautiously addressing here for five years: business case for the Green Deal?" 14 000 pages of regulation, 900 delegated acts still ahead of us. And now we are disc

Madam President, this is not the usual comment of a rapporteur highlighting his sunny personality. This is a decisive vote of this Parliament. This is about whether we are going to have a framework programme, an independent research framework programme, in the future or not. Whether it's squeezed into an absurd idea of an all-in-all competitiveness programme, which is squeezing together 35 years o

Mr President! Ladies and Gentlemen! With the compass for a competitive EU, I believe we have, for the first time, an instrument that gives us a direction to navigate through the storm we are in. The poster boy of the right plunges the world into a new protectionism. With massive subsidies, China is leading to distortions of competition in global markets that threaten our economy. We have a dilemma

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Commissioner! After all, I admire the intellectual frugality that is needed, so to speak, to read to us. I don’t think we have heard the gunshot – and not all of them. Yes, we are talking about the erosion of the industrial base of one of the key industries in Europe, and we are talking about the fact that we are not meeting the 55% targets, so to speak – and

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen. I come from a region in Germany that has been the major energy and lignite region in Europe for 150 years. Already the announcement of this has led to the fact that this proud lignite region has decided to become the first net-zero region in Europe, that is, the people who are hardest hit, so to speak, in their jobs, in the economic development of the region, wh

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, Today marks a crucial moment when, for the first time, we are finally making a real effort to strengthen the competitiveness of European industry. The Green Deal will not work without competitiveness. On Tuesday, we discussed the Union’s post-2024 strategic agenda, with competitiveness at the heart of the discussion. However, it says a lot about the last five

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen! What is Competitiveness? Competitiveness is the expression and also the need in Europe to ensure freedom, security, social stability, an environment that we want to hand over to a next generation in the European democracies. Competitiveness is not the contrast between ecology, social issues and economic interests, but the basis of our societies. If we want to

Mr President, Madam Commissioner, colleagues, there are two things we need to make clear, very clear today. First, Parliament is a strong supporter of the participation of New Zealand in the Union’s programmes. We are strong supporters of other countries like the Faroe Islands, Canada and South Korea participating in our programmes. The resolution we will adopt today makes it very clear we have no

– Mr President, ladies and gentlemen! I know how much these brief speeches get on everyone's nerves before reports, but we have had a discussion on the rule of law this morning. And this proposal is Parliament's first proposal to the Commission to establish, in concrete terms, the legislative framework to protect the freedom of science in Europe. We have had to learn, and perhaps we did not think

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I think that’s good news for the climate; it’s good news for the European economy; and it’s a clear answer to the Americans, to the Inflation Reduction Act. So, I thank for the constructive majority in the Parliament, and let’s now dance with the Council. So, in line with Rule 59 of the Rules of Procedure, I would like to ask for the matter to be referred back t

Madam President, A German sociologist once described politics as the islands of attachment. And what we heard today was in part encouraging, but in part also relatively questionable. Mr Carême has done everything possible to deepen the perhaps false prejudice that greens simply do not understand anything about the economy and value chains. Mr. Botenga, whom I really appreciate intellectually, is f

Madam President, Commissioner! We were just talking about what we wanted. At this point on the agenda, we are talking about how we actually do it. The Commission presented the Green Deal at the beginning of the legislative term – a combination of a great climate ambition, which I think we broadly share, but also the question of how to combine the European economy and the jobs associated with it, b

Mr President, dear Commissioner Ivanova, welcome to the plenary: it is your debut, but it is a highly and hotly debated topic we talk about today. Yesterday we had a debate on the 2024 budget, where the Council shamelessly cuts innovation. It is almost an annual ritual. I pointed it out there, and many other colleagues, and I will repeat it now: without innovation, we fail on our climate, on our d