Vote in the European Parliament
People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan
After § 17 – Am 1
Date: 24.10.2024Reference: RC-B10-0134/2024TaiwanUN resolutionSouth China Sea questionChinainternational lawmilitary manoeuvresstrategic autonomynational sovereigntydemocracyinternational organisation
Overall Result
- 162 For
- 378 Against
- 16 Abstention
- 163 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
Rejected
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- 720 MEPs directly elected for EU Parliament
- President elected for two-and-a-half-year terms
- 26 committees prepare legislation
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For8
- 8For
- 8Against
- 6Abstention
- 8Did not vote
For8
- 8For
- 143Against
- 0Abstention
- 37Did not vote
For61
- 61For
- 0Against
- 5Abstention
- 12Did not vote
For20
- 20For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 4Did not vote
For63
- 63For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 22Did not vote
For1
- 1For
- 93Against
- 1Abstention
- 41Did not vote
For1
- 1For
- 56Against
- 0Abstention
- 20Did not vote
For0
- 0For
- 35Against
- 2Abstention
- 9Did not vote
For0
- 0For
- 43Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |