Vote in the European Parliament
People’s Republic of China’s misinterpretation of the UN resolution 2758 and its continuous military provocations around Taiwan
§ 8/2
Date: 24.10.2024Reference: RC-B10-0134/2024TaiwanUN resolutionSouth China Sea questionChinainternational lawmilitary manoeuvresstrategic autonomynational sovereigntydemocracyinternational organisation
Overall Result
- 488 For
- 44 Against
- 37 Abstention
- 150 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
Adopted
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- 720 MEPs directly elected for EU Parliament
- President elected for two-and-a-half-year terms
- 26 committees prepare legislation
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For4
- 4For
- 10Against
- 10Abstention
- 6Did not vote
For55
- 55For
- 1Against
- 6Abstention
- 24Did not vote
For145
- 145For
- 0Against
- 6Abstention
- 37Did not vote
For102
- 102For
- 3Against
- 1Abstention
- 30Did not vote
For44
- 44For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
For58
- 58For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 19Did not vote
For64
- 64For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 10Did not vote
For15
- 15For
- 14Against
- 8Abstention
- 9Did not vote
For1
- 1For
- 16Against
- 2Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |