Vote in the European Parliament
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the draft Commission regulation amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for benomyl, carbendazim and thiophanate‐methyl in or on certain products
Motion for a resolution
Date: 18.09.2024Reference: B10-0020/2024Overall Result
- 516 For
- 129 Against
- 27 Abstention
- 44 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
Adopted
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Rejection of import tolerances for Carbendazim and Thiophanat-methyl.
- Demand to lower MRL values to detection limits.
- Criticism of competitive disadvantages for EU farmers.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For27
- 27For
- 4Against
- 0Abstention
- 1Did not vote
For50
- 50For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
For78
- 78For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
For51
- 51For
- 19Against
- 3Abstention
- 4Did not vote
For63
- 63For
- 105Against
- 7Abstention
- 13Did not vote
For44
- 44For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
For68
- 68For
- 1Against
- 5Abstention
- 4Did not vote
For126
- 126For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
For9
- 9For
- 0Against
- 12Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 716
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |