Vote in the European Parliament
Rule of Law in Malta: 6 years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia and the need to protect journalists
§ 20/2
Date: 19.10.2023Reference: B9-0449/2023judicial proceedingscommunications professionfreedom of the pressright to justicerule of lawmoney launderingfundamental rightsMaltaorganised crimeparticipatory democracyfreedom of expressioncorruption
Overall Result
- 406 For
- 86 Against
- 17 Abstention
- 193 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
Adopted
The Parliament recorded no outcome; this is derived from the vote count.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Six years after Daphne Caruana Galizia’s assassination.
- Demand to end the culture of impunity in Malta.
- Prioritizing protection of journalists and media freedom.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For93
- 93For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 48Did not vote
For130
- 130For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 46Did not vote
For77
- 77For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 24Did not vote
For68
- 68For
- 57Against
- 7Abstention
- 52Did not vote
For25
- 25For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
For8
- 8For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
For4
- 4For
- 14Against
- 3Abstention
- 3Did not vote
For1
- 1For
- 15Against
- 7Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 702
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |