Vote in the European Parliament
Rule of Law in Malta: 6 years after the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia and the need to protect journalists
§ 20/1
Date: 19.10.2023Reference: B9-0449/2023judicial proceedingscommunications professionfreedom of the pressright to justicerule of lawmoney launderingfundamental rightsMaltaorganised crimeparticipatory democracyfreedom of expressioncorruption
Overall Result
- 477 For
- 22 Against
- 13 Abstention
- 190 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
Adopted
The Parliament recorded no outcome; this is derived from the vote count.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Six years after Daphne Caruana Galizia’s assassination.
- Demand to end the culture of impunity in Malta.
- Prioritizing protection of journalists and media freedom.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For79
- 79For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 22Did not vote
For95
- 95For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 46Did not vote
For129
- 129For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 47Did not vote
For102
- 102For
- 19Against
- 8Abstention
- 55Did not vote
For17
- 17For
- 3Against
- 1Abstention
- 3Did not vote
For27
- 27For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
For19
- 19For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 7Did not vote
For9
- 9For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 702
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |