EN
ItalianoVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on Policy Coherence for Development
Date: 14.03.2023Reference: A9-0019/2023For545
- 545 For
- 26 Against
- 32 Abstention
- 102 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
AdoptedThe Parliament recorded no outcome; this is derived from the vote count.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
P9_PV(2023)03-14(RCV)
- Policy Coherence for Development as EU legal obligation since 2009 .
- Demand for binding action plan with indicators by 2023 .
- Criticism of poor implementation despite 2018 external evaluation .
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
European People's Party (EPP)For147
- 147
- 0
- 0
- 29
Renew Europe (Renew)For91
- 91
- 0
- 0
- 10
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For124
- 124
- 0
- 0
- 20
Non-attached Members (NI)For112
- 112
- 19
- 18
- 35
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For22
- 22
- 2
- 1
- 5
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For31
- 31
- 0
- 0
- 2
Identity and Democracy (ID)For5
- 5
- 5
- 13
- 1
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For13
- 13
- 0
- 0
- 0
Selected member
Select member
·My voteNo information
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Czechia | EPP | For | |
 Netherlands | EPP | For | |
 Cyprus | EPP | For | |
 Germany | Renew | For | |
| Netherlands | S&D | For | |
 Slovakia | S&D | For | |
| Netherlands | Renew | For | |
 Spain | S&D | For | |
 France | Renew | For | |
| Germany | EPP | For |
