Vote in the European Parliament
European Central Bank - annual report 2022
Rasmus Andresen – § 16 – Am 6
Date: 16.02.2023Reference: A9-0022/2023monetary policysustainable developmentRusso-Ukrainian issueinflationfinancial transparencygreen economyeuro areaEuropean Central Bankactivity reportgender equality
Overall Result
- 70 For
- 363 Against
- 74 Abstention
- 198 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status
Rejected
The Parliament recorded no outcome; this is derived from the vote count.
- Vote held on
Procedure timeline
No procedure timeline is available for this vote yet.
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Criticism of Russia's war of aggression and its EU economic impact
- Demand for price stability as ECB priority despite inflation risks
- Emphasis on ECB independence in monetary policy decisions
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For44
- 44For
- 52Against
- 34Abstention
- 54Did not vote
For7
- 7For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
For7
- 7For
- 1Against
- 22Abstention
- 2Did not vote
For6
- 6For
- 14Against
- 3Abstention
- 7Did not vote
For4
- 4For
- 7Against
- 7Abstention
- 6Did not vote
For1
- 1For
- 79Against
- 7Abstention
- 57Did not vote
For1
- 1For
- 127Against
- 0Abstention
- 48Did not vote
For0
- 0For
- 82Against
- 1Abstention
- 19Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 705
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
Intended voteAbstentionSubmitted vote: For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |