21
Oct
2025
Watch
Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiations (debate)
Mr President, if there is a fundamental mission for the European Union, it is the unification of our continent. But in order to receive new members we must first clean our own house, make renovations as necessary in any house after a few decades. We cannot build Europe's future with the tools of the past. An enlarged union with more than 30 member states simply cannot afford to be paralysed by the veto right of a single government, and the enlargement process cannot require unanimity at every technical step. The cost of inaction is too high and too risky. That is why, with this report, for which I congratulate colleague Sandro Gozi, we propose a path towards a more efficient, democratic and stronger European Union, one capable of acting faster, speaking with one voice and empowering its citizens. Enlargement requires reform on the part of candidate countries such as Moldova, Ukraine or the Western Balkan states, but also on our part. By reforming the Union's institutions and procedures, we are preparing for the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century.