What André spoke about.

Madam President, Commissioner, we have farmers on the doorstep of this Parliament again today, and rightly so. More than a month ago, when the conflict broke out in Iran, we called for immediate action. We all knew that the issue was not just geopolitical. The truth is that Europe is too exposed. European agriculture relies heavily on imported fertilisers. In Portugal, the price of urea has doubled, while in corn production there are reports of a cost increase of more than 300 euros per hectare. Talking about European production and fertilisers is positive, but this does not lower farmers' bills now. Farmers cannot wait for the future. The agricultural campaign does not wait. They need support and solutions now. They need funding, crisis instruments. If the agricultural policy is common, the response in times of crisis must also be common. And you have to be quick, Commissioner.

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, women's work in rural areas is invisible to many. The Azores prove it. Women contribute to the development of numerous farms, but the figures do not lie: the female employment rate is 40 % below the European average, only 12 % of agricultural area is managed by women and only 2 % of bank funding is directed to women. They contribute a lot, but are not recognized. That is why we have put forward concrete proposals: top-ups in the CAP and the European Social Fund, preferential access to land and credit, digital investment against isolation. The rural world is not, and cannot continue to be, just a Men's World.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, Europe cannot produce less food, it cannot produce less animal protein, nor can it abandon its farmers. And yet, that's what happens when we impose costs that our competitors don't have and bureaucracy that stifles and reduces support and presence when they need it most. We need a CAP that protects, science that prevents, rapid responses when there are outbreaks. But we also need, above all, political clarity. European livestock farming is not an enemy of the climate, nor is it an enemy of animal welfare; rather, it is part of the solution. This report is not just about one aspect of agricultural policy. It is the future of entire communities that is at stake, and these communities need a new future.

Mr President, more than 70% of Europeans think that the Union should have more means to face the current global challenges. Employment, housing and public health, education, training, culture and youth policies, security and defence are the concrete answers they expect from us and they are the answers we have to give. This report does not shy away from the challenges, but rather faces ‑os with ambition: an overall budget increase of more than 10%, because we cannot do more with less resources. Cohesion policy is a real glue between regions and citizens, and the European Social Fund ensures that no one is left behind; the valorisation of key strategic sectors such as agriculture, especially in the outermost regions, with around 60% more for POSEI and an increase of more than 260 % for fisheries. It is not, of course, a perfect budget, but it is a much better proposal than the starting point and I therefore welcome the difficult work of the rapporteurs. This is the Europe we must affirm.

Madam President, Commissioner, from the Lajes base in the Azores to the NATO base in Romania, our collective security extends ‑se throughout the territory of the Union. We can't just be a place of transit. We must be guardians of our interests, of our people, but also of our values. Europe does not defend itself by buying 27 times the same dependence, nor by wavering in the face of blackmail from our so-called partners. It defends ‑se with more political union, more internal cohesion, its own and harmonised industrial capacity. Defend ‑se with joint purchasing, distributed investment, training and concerted strategy across the Union. But just as we cannot overlook these material gaps, we cannot neglect our geography either. The Atlantic, the outermost regions and strategic infrastructure, such as submarine cables – which connect and serve the whole Union – need to have a new focus and momentum. Protecting the Atlantic is also protecting Europe.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, very quickly, what we are discussing here today is not an exotic subject. These are concerns of fishermen, coastal communities, outermost regions and the tourism sector. But they are also, in essence, concerns of the real economy of many territories of the European Union. This report puts forward better responses to support the protection of our biodiversity and the fight against invasive species. 51% of seabirds, 45% of marine mammals, 40% of sharks and 100% of turtles in Europe are threatened today. 53% of Europe’s maritime coastlines are currently under pressure due to the presence of invasive alien species, with very significant regional variations: 33% of the Baltic Sea coastal bands, 100% of the Black Sea, 98% of the Mediterranean Sea and 25% of the North-East Atlantic. This trend will grow and is increasingly driven by climate change, causing severe ecological damage and significant economic losses, particularly for artisanal fishing and aquaculture, but not only. We can't go on like this. We have to do more, we have to do better. That is why I am asking for your support and your vote on this report, and I am also grateful for all the work done by the other political groups on this dossier.

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, after listening to all the speeches in this debate, I recall a famous sentence summarising, I believe, what we have been talking about here today: Now this is not the end. It's not even the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps the end of the beginning. We have a lot of work ahead of us. In this time of uncertainty, progress and setbacks, with growing political tensions, with increasing pressure on available resources, with an increasingly polarised political climate, this Parliament is setting an example of how we can overcome differences, blur divergences and work towards common consensus and solutions. This proposal, as I have already said, does not solve everything, but it is a step in the right direction and demonstrates that it is possible to combine simpler rules with more and better support, without weakening environmental rules or social protection. It now remains for us not to forget the many difficulties faced by producers and, above all, to listen carefully to what they are saying and the reasons that lead them, once again, to take to the streets already this month. Let us all continue to work on solutions. Because that is what European farmers expect of us.

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, after a simplification exercise in 2024, the second simplification proposal presented by the European Commission in May 2025 sought to respond directly to the calls from farmers and the conclusions of the strategic dialogue with the sector on the future of European agriculture. I want to start by saying clearly what this proposal is not: It is not a magic wand that solves all problems in the rural world, in particular income. Nor will it be the silver bullet that will solve all the challenges of those who work the earth. But it is a help and it is an important help. What we are putting to the vote this week is a simplification package of rules that have all too often become incomprehensible, contradictory and disproportionate for those who have to apply them on a day-to-day basis. The mandate that this Parliament adopted was clear: effectively simplify for farmers and national and regional administrations, strengthen crisis response capacity and improve the environmental and social objectives enshrined in the 2021 reform. It was with this mandate that we entered the negotiations. We comply with three guiding principles: simplifying what does not work, making the environmental and social basis of the CAP clearer and more achievable, and strengthening subsidiarity, without fragmenting the internal market or weakening our common ambition. Today, with the agreement we have reached with the Council and supported by almost all the political groups in this House in the Committee on Agriculture, we are presenting a concrete response to the demand for respect and trust that comes to us from farmers in the four corners of the European Union. It's not perfect, it's not total, but it's real. Firstly, the income of farmers and the rural world. We have increased the simplified payment for small farmers by more than 50%, rising from EUR 1 250 to EUR 3 000 per year, reducing red tape and bringing predictability to income. We have also created a new instrument for rural economic initiatives, with support of up to EUR 75 000, capable of supporting the setting up of young farmers, the creation of new rural businesses and the diversification of the rural economy. Then, on environmental cross-compliance, we adopted a more rational definition of permanent pasture that avoids artificial interventions in the soil just to preserve an administrative status, thus giving farmers more legal certainty. In the rules that protect the most sensitive soils, we have prevented the erosion of agricultural land and safeguarded biodiversity on farms. As regards crop rotation, farms of less than 30 hectares are allowed to no longer be subject to controls and penalties, which represents a clear gain in proportionality for thousands and thousands of small farms across the Union. I would also stress two essential elements for me, namely strengthening social and territorial cohesion. As regards social conditionality, it remains fully in force and the Commission has committed to finalise, by the first half of 2027, a study assessing the impact of these labour protection rules to support the upcoming CAP reform. And for the outermost regions, we have opened up the possibility of transferring up to 25% of the specific second pillar allocation to reinforce POSEI. Finally, and administratively, this is a simplification with real impact. It establishes as a rule a single face-to-face check per holding per year, based on a risk assessment. Advances can reach up to 70% of direct payments and 85% in rural development. Ladies and gentlemen, as rapporteur, I would like to thank the shadow rapporteurs, the Presidency of the Council, the Commission and the technical teams for their work throughout this process. Much more could be said about this proposal – which, I repeat, does not solve everything, but improves the lives of those who bring food every day to the table of Europeans – but time is scarce. I would therefore ask you to vote in favour; farmers, the rural world and a CAP that is simpler, fairer and closer to reality.

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, first of all I would like to thank everyone for their contribution to this debate today. The proposal we are debating today does one essential thing: It paves the way. With its approval – as I hope – tomorrow, we will immediately enter into negotiations with the Council and the Commission to try to reach a consensus that will allow it to enter into force at the beginning of next year. The truth is that European farmers and agriculture can no longer wait. The environmental transition is done with farmers, not against farmers. That is why we advocate conditionality with proportionality for small farms, realistic tolerances when the climate fails and support for those who need it most. But it must also be said that it is possible not to create formulas that empty the environmental objectives. It is therefore a question of focusing results on the ground and not of deregulating. Although many seem to be more committed to ending the CAP than to securing its future, this Parliament knows what its fellow citizens expect. The data shows this: 92% of Europeans consider agriculture and rural areas decisive for our future; 77% recognise that the Common Agricultural Policy fulfils its role in ensuring food supply and 70% believe that the CAP benefits the whole of society, not just farmers. Let us therefore be consistent with this confidence. This proposal is therefore also a test of the credibility of the institutions. Or we show that we listen to those who work the land and produce solutions that alleviate the lives of those who produce or, again, we postpone. I choose responsibility. Move forward now with balance and common sense, to simplify without unprotecting, modernize without excluding, streamline without defunding. Finally, once again, I would like to express my sincere thanks to the shadow rapporteurs for the demanding work, constant availability and constructive spirit with which they have contributed to this report, which I hope will receive your support tomorrow in the votes.

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, over the last few years farmers have made themselves heard on the roads of Europe, in the squares of our cities, outside and inside this Parliament. And European farmers have been very clear: want to produce and want less paperwork; fewer duplications; more time in the field, with stable rules. This is what we are talking about today: restore predictability to those who produce the food that comes to our tables, to those who care for our territory and guarantee the future of the rural world. The proposal we are bringing in response to the European Commission's proposal is not intended to rewrite the CAP, but to make it simpler and more accessible. It is not perfect, but in the face of the reality of the terrain, rather made than perfect. What we are proposing here is a course correction against European bureaucratic inertia. Cut context costs without cutting rights. Earn efficiency without losing rigor. Accelerate payments without giving up controls. We have also done this work with the purpose of helping the public administration to do what it should: serve as a single access bridge and not as access to doors of an infinite labyrinth, so that information circulates between entities and the same document is not requested two, three, four times from the same farmer. Less friction in procedures means fewer errors, more focused inspections and more timely payments. And so, too, trust is restored. That's also why we give a signal to those who need it most. Small and medium-sized farms will have a simpler and more stable regime at the scale of their reality, as well as greater support. Those who walk the field every day do not want administrative labyrinths, but rather predictable supports to be able to invest, plan and continue. At the same time, we make it very clear: Simplification does not mean deregulation. We do not give up the essential safeguards or the commitment, first of all, to dignity in agricultural work. Receiving public money requires respect for labour standards and transparency in the use of funds. And serenely, serenely but simply, let me also tell you: there is no future for agriculture without an environment and there is no protected environment without farmers with incomes. Also, let me point out that we have adapted the Commission's proposals to the level of risk management tools, adjusting the threshold for losses and allowing methodologies adapted to permanent crops, young people and new farmers. Resilience yes, but with accountability and transparency. Finally, we have introduced more agile mechanisms for Member States to amend their strategic plans, allowing for quick adjustments, without opening structural discussions in each review. This ensures predictability and speed. Two words that were hardly used to being combined with the CAP. Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, the common agricultural policy needs something very simple: Speak the language of those who work the land. Let us make the policy work where it really counts, on the ground, with the more than 9 million European farmers, from the island of Flores, in the Azores, in the heart of the Atlantic, to the eastern end of Romania, from the frozen north, from Finland to the sunny sun of Andalusia. I ask for your support to take a concrete step, to give back time, to give back income and to give predictability to European agriculture. History is not written with promises, it is written with decisions. And the right decision today is to approve this report and to make its measures concrete, to make reality concrete. Finally, I would like to thank all of them, including my fellow shadow rapporteurs, for the work they have also done to make this report a reality.

Madam President, Commissioner, we run the risk of having a CAP that is little more than an acronym. To undermine it, reduce its budget or turn it into a national fund is to undermine the income of millions of producers and their families, our food security and territorial cohesion. The post-2027 CAP must respect those who work the land, it must have a fair and stable budget, indexed to inflation, so that support does not become cuts in disguise. A CAP worthy of the name cannot bear the brunt of the just transition alone, nor can it fail to support producers when everything is lost due to climate change. A CAP worthy of the name must protect small and medium-sized farmers, ensure generational renewal and strengthen programmes such as POSEI, which is essential for regions such as the Azores. The Commission should not deceive itself, nor should it deceive others. Fewer rules, with less support, have only one name: Disaccountability. History will tell who defended the CAP and who abandoned it.

Madam President, Commissioner, the United Nations Ocean Conference has once again been clear. Marine degradation is accelerating and, without immediate action, the future of marine life and, as a result, of all of us will be compromised. In this context, I welcome the European Commission's proposal on the European Oceans Pact. In particular, I would stress the recognition of the fundamental role of fishermen in the management of our seas, the common fisheries policy, blue innovation and the safeguarding of the outermost regions and artisanal fleets, without forgetting the international dimension of the European Union's seas policy. Portugal, the Azores and Madeira have here a historic opportunity to lead. But, let us be frank, without a powerful financial lever, from which a proper, comprehensive and dedicated fund of the European Union must emerge, the Pact risks being only a manifesto of good intentions. Our ambition therefore needs to be funded. The reconversion of the fisheries sector should be further supported and words really need to translate into more action and investment.

Dear colleague, Mr Oliveira, first of all I would like to thank you for the question and for the opportunity I have to be able to answer it. It is obvious that we do not share the same political vision; I believe that this report has many positive aspects and my intervention has focused precisely on those positive aspects. But we don't have the world we want, we have the world we have, and that means acting in the face of that reality to transform it. This report – and the focus on rural development as a priority in its many dimensions – seeks exactly to strengthen this presence in the rural world and also to strengthen the Common Agricultural Policy in its second pillar. There are many things we can even agree on that need to be corrected. But that is not the scope of this intervention, let alone what this report now refers to.

Madam President, Commissioner, the report we are discussing today proposes long-overdue responses to the structural challenges of rural areas. More investment in public services, infrastructure, digitalisation, support to employment and local communities. It also underlines the urgency of halting depopulation, strengthening the role of women and young people, supporting SMEs and ensuring that rural areas are not left behind in the energy transition. But let us have no illusions; without a more ambitious, articulate and simple rural development policy, none of these responses will be realised. Some want to end the second pillar of the CAP; Here we clearly say no. Rather, it should be strengthened and better articulated with a truly decentralised cohesion policy anchored in territories and their communities. Action and ambition are needed, and these need to be reflected in the next Multiannual Financial Framework. It is now up to the Commission, the Member States and this Parliament to take their responsibility towards the rural world and not to vote to abandon it.

Mr President, Commissioner, we need a new vision for a new time in the world and for a new moment in our history. To do this, we need a Community budget with greater resources to meet greater challenges, which opens up the possibility of new sources of funding to meet the new demands of our collective life, which continues to support economic, social and territorial cohesion, which deepens the single market, which reduces inequalities, poverty and social exclusion, which supports the traditional sectors of agriculture and fisheries and looks at the new potential in innovation, in the oceans and in space, which does not abandon our climate ambitions, but also reinforces the urgency of our security and our defence, which realises that we need to address the housing crisis and the aspirations of our young people, which defends our outermost regions. A budget capable of asserting the European Union and responding to the challenges of modernity – this is what this Parliament aspires to, and this is what this proposal stands for.

Mr President, Commissioner, Minister, Europe is the most maritime of the continents. This is therefore the time to affirm a blue Europe, where healthy seas coexist with sustainable coastal communities. The European Ocean Pact must be a binding commitment to restore, protect and sustainably manage our maritime ecosystems and support the communities that depend on them. Keeping fishermen and coastal communities at the heart of the decision-making process; unlocking the economic and social potential of new activities, in particular science and the blue economy; fully protecting the most environmentally sensitive areas, eliminating harmful practices and strengthening international cooperation – these are just some of the principles to follow for a new era of European leadership in the oceans. But for the pact to be effective, it must also be accompanied by appropriate and additional funding, in addition to the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund. In the European Union, as is already the case in the Azores, sea and land are just one – our home. So let us know how to take care of it.

Colleague, thank you very much for your questions, the first of which I must say is that we have been advocating for a long time the need to have a real balance in the food chain, so that producers are not, in fact, the poor relative of this same chain, thus ensuring greater equality in the distribution of income. As for the question you are asking about quotas (which, as you know, are many years old), the truth is that we cannot take a position that goes against what is inevitable. And, as we all know, at the time, the quota system was over. It was an inevitability. Despite all the constraints it may have created, the truth is that the sector has been able to overcome this same embarrassment in a positive way.

Mr President, Commissioner, the need to ensure a fair and stable income for today's farmers and to build a sector that is attractive enough to attract tomorrow's farmers are priorities with which, I am sure, we all agree. However, they will only be achievable with a robust budget capable of addressing the complex challenges facing the sector. In this context, it is essential to maintain coherence and interconnection between funds linked to agriculture, as well as to defend and strengthen the role of partnerships with regional and local authorities in their implementation. I therefore welcome the recognition in the Vision for Agriculture and Food of the specificities of the outermost regions and the importance of the POSEI scheme. However, Commissioner, this programme needs to be updated – which has not been the case for more than a decade – so that it can have funds that truly match the real needs of the agricultural sector in these regions, thus doing justice to those who work in it.

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, if the decision of the previous Icelandic Government is upheld, more than two thousand whales could disappear from our oceans by 2029. This measure not only threatens the preservation of these species, but also blatantly ignores global calls for the protection of marine ecosystems and the conservation of biodiversity. Whaling is an archaic activity that should not take place today, especially when there are sustainable alternatives that protect and value tradition, ecosystems and the economy. I come from a region, the Azores, where whaling was an integral part of our culture and our economy, but which we ended in 1987. Today, in the Azores, there is a whole new economic sector resulting from the preservation and observation of cetaceans, with marine ecotourism having an annual economic impact of more than EUR 210 million and generating jobs and wealth. The two species concerned by this authorisation, the minke whale and the fin whale, are protected species, and the fin whale is even one of the species at risk. We therefore urge the new Icelandic Government to reverse this authorisation as soon as possible, the international community to unite against this decision and to promote the necessary diplomatic efforts for Iceland to review its position. It is imperative that we ensure the protection of endangered species in the name and in defence of the future of our planet.

Mr President, Mr President-in-Office of the Council, one of the issues that really affects the sector is the inequality that exists in the sector, and certainly we all need to think about bringing together and getting a compromise so that our producers can achieve more balanced incomes and thus see greater redistribution and greater justice. I think that is what we are all focused on, especially if we do not forget that the problem that we have today of food inflation being higher than the average inflation that exists in other products should lead us to reflect on the importance that there is of introducing compensation mechanisms that can balance the sector.

Mr President, Commissioner, working conditions in agriculture are difficult, with a significant precariousness of employment contracts, more than a quarter of the workforce is seasonal and the contribution of a large number of migrants, often also without adequate social and labour protection. But there are other dimensions that truly concern our producers. There are concerns about the income and future sustainability of the sector. The Commission has just released the report "Prospects for European Agriculture 2024-2035" and the scenario is not encouraging: the value of agricultural production whose annual growth is less than the annual increase in production costs; a forecast reduction in farmers’ incomes in real terms of more than half a percent, taking into account inflation; and the chronic problem of an ageing sector, growing labour shortages and the huge challenge of generational renewal. All of this requires action. The introduction of a social conditionality mechanism in the previous revision of the CAP was an important measure to raise labour standards. But now, more than ever, it is important that in the vision for the future of agriculture and food – which we look forward to – agricultural producers and workers are put at the centre of the discussion.

Madam President, honourable Member, what I think is really important and fundamental today is that we can all speak with one voice to support those who are victims of a tragedy and that we do not use that same tragedy to make policy in a way that does not concern and cannot clearly respond to the victims of a tragedy. Being able to confuse something that affects so many people in an outermost region and wanting to confuse and bring up the problem of immigration does not honour the victims of Mayotte and it is therefore regrettable that it did so.