20
Oct
2025
Watch
The decision to impose a fine on Google: defending press and media freedom in the EU (debate)
Mr President, thank you very much. Ladies and Gentlemen, The decision to impose a fine on Google is an example of a worrying trend: Punishing success instead of promoting innovation. Google has gained its position thanks to the technological advantage and services that millions of Europeans use every day. So is it really about protecting media pluralism or trying to weaken an uncomfortable giant? Let me remind you: The European Commission has never intervened against Twitter, today X, despite the fact that for years this platform with a clearly left-wing attitude has influenced public debate, deleting entries or accounts. The Commission reacted only after Elon Musk took over the service and liberalised content policy, threatening billions in penalties and blockades. You react immediately to giants like Google and Amazon. On the other hand, in the case of left-wing opinion-forming platforms, you limit yourself to purely symbolic gestures. Is this really an expression of concern for media balance or rather a fear of losing ideological influence? And since we are talking about media freedom, it is worth asking where the European Commission was when the government of Donald Tusk forcibly took over public media in Poland. What did the Commission do then? Nothing, ladies and gentlemen, nothing at all. The decision to punish Google is not about protecting media pluralism, but about bureaucratic control. This is an example of politically motivated regulatory selectivity in its pure form. Instead of being an area of freedom and innovation, Europe increasingly resembles a censor who is afraid of real competition, including that of ideas.