Speeches

Mr President, Mr González Casares, Mrs Corrado, you did not want to use Spanish energy policy as an example. What do they want, an even bigger blackout? Commissioner, do you know who wins when the price of energy goes up? The State, through taxes. And you know who pays for it? It is paid by families, it is paid by the self-employed, it is paid by SMEs and it is paid by European industry. Meanwhile, in Spain, Pedro Sánchez's government is making decisions that go in the opposite direction to common sense. Spain has no gas. And yet Sanchez wants to shut down nuclear, to make us more dependent on foreign gas. It's hard to make it worse. And it does so after the April 28 blackout. And he does it by ignoring the experts. And it does so by ignoring the European Commission. And it does so knowing that the result will be very clear: more expensive energy, more dependence and less industry. This is not an energy transition: it is an ideology imposed against reality. And those who end up paying for it are the citizens.

Madam President, Commissioner, I begin by addressing the Spanish Government. Do you know how my wife feels every Thursday that she has to take the train to go to Madrid? He feels afraid, afraid of not knowing if he will ever see his children again. She and millions of Spaniards who take the train every day. Do you know how my sister-in-law feels when she goes to work at the hospital on a 24-hour guard? He feels afraid, afraid of not knowing if after 18 hours his mind will be agile and prepared for a pediatric emergency. Do you know how the police and the Civil Guard feel every time they have to go out and patrol the streets in Spain? They feel insecurity, insecurity of not knowing if they are going to return home to see their children because the Government is not giving them the necessary means to do their job. And do you know what the common denominator of all these situations is? That they are people who work to pay taxes, taxes that the Government later manages and for which it is not accountable. What happened in Adamuz is not a coincidence, it is the consequence of years of lack of investment in maintenance, of public contracts with dubious allocation and of neglect on the part of the Administration before the alarms reported by the railway operators. And now I turn to you, Oscar Puente, Minister of Transport: It is not worth asking for forgiveness when Adif operators remove the material facts of the accident under investigation from the site. When moving and removing evidence of an accident with fatalities, the maximum responsible should not apologize, should resign. And for the European Commission, if 110 million were allocated from Europe in 2024 to improve this railway line, we must demand a thorough audit of all contracts and work carried out.

Mr President, Commissioner, it seems that our group was not on the wrong track. This energy package includes what we have been asking for: lower prices, strengthen energy security, invest in nuclear energy and modernise networks and interconnections. Congratulations, thanks for getting in the car of common sense. But what about Spain? Spain maintains the closure of the nuclear starting with Almaraz I by 2027. I'll put a date on the table: October 2026. From that moment, if that plan has not been stopped, the closure of Almaraz will be irreversible; that means more dependence on imported gas, less firm power and more risk to the stability of the system, with direct impact on both Portugal and southern France. We saw it on April 28, 2025. This afternoon we sent a letter to you, Vice-President Ribera and President von der Leyen. In this letter we are asking to stop that plan and demand transparency and technical criteria, and nothing more. Also, leave the ideological calendars. Europe cannot be calling for fewer dependencies and more industry, and looking the other way when a Member State removes its firm and clean energy.

Madam President, Commissioner, Europe is not going to win the digital race with more papers, it can win it with fiber, with 5G, with 6G, with security and with investment. Today the problem is simple, you said: Europe is fragmented, slow and expensive, and while we discuss forms, others build networks, attract investment and dominate artificial intelligence. The Digital Networks Act can be an opportunity or it can be another mistake. From the ECR Group, we will support it only if three things are made very clear. First, sovereignty: Europe needs secure critical networks, but without centralising everything in Brussels. States must maintain operational control because the reality is not the same in Valencia, Warsaw or Helsinki. Secondly, a real, real simplification: there must be fewer duplications, fewer formalities, fewer delays, because every month that Europe delays a deployment, it loses competitiveness. Third, freedom to invest: if this file becomes more burdens and more costs, the investment will go out, and without investment there is no coverage, there is no digital industry, there is no employment. And a key and important point is strategic independence: In networks, submarine cables and critical technology we cannot depend on third parties. Europe must be able to protect itself with its own capacity, not with faith. In short, we need less bureaucracy and more networks. Europe does not need a new layer of regulation; needs infrastructure. The recipe for success is very simple: networks that work, businesses that grow and citizens that trust.

Mr President, Europe not only has a migration problem, it has a control problem. And when the state loses control, it is occupied by the mafias. Without control there is no security, no social cohesion, no trust in institutions. And if we want to get it back, there are three priorities. The first is the real and fast returns: To remain without the right to do so is not a right, it is an illegality. Those who do not have the right to stay must return, with effective agreements and consequences for those who do not cooperate. The second is visas with conditions: the visa is not a gift, it is a contract; either there is cooperation in readmission and the fight against mafias, or there are no facilities. The third is cooperation with third countries by results. No more blank checks. Aid, yes, but conditional on border control, dismantling of criminal networks and acceptance of returns. Because protecting those who really need it is impossible if we let the mafias decide who gets in. Europe must once again rule at its borders.

Madam President, Commissioner, we agree on the diagnosis: Cybersecurity is no longer a technical issue, cybersecurity is everywhere. It is in our hospitals, in energy, in transport, in our children's mobile phones, in administration, etc., and is part of hybrid attack campaigns. But from the ECR Group we put three conditions. The first is sovereignty and subsidiarity: ENISA should support and coordinate, yes, but operational control should continue in the Member States. The second is real simplification: A single reporting point and more streamlined certification only work if they reduce burden and eliminate duplication. If we add another layer, our SMEs will not be able to comply. The third is strategic independence: the de-risking This is all very well, but we need European capacity and secure supply chains. In the end, success is measured in one thing: services that don't fall and attacks that don't thrive, and that should be our standard.

Mr President, Commissioner, how many more scandals will Spain tolerate before it reacts? How many abuses, how many victims silenced, how many resignations without explanation do we need to wake up? Today we talk about sexual harassment in public institutions and the problem is also the double yardstick. When cases appear in the environment of the left, they are relativized, they hide. But if they're from the other side, then yes: headlines, lynchings and sermons. That's not justice. That's propaganda and ideological bias. Zero tolerance is not a slogan, it is a democratic obligation. Europe must demand effective protocols, real protection for victims and immediate political responsibilities. And the key question is for civil society: Until when complicit silence, until when resignation? This is about dignity, not ideology. Let's wake up. Let's go out peacefully. Let us demand transparency and accountability. Spain deserves clean institutions. And that starts with one word: resignations.

Mr President, I am Valencian – I was there and I am here every week – and what hurts us most is not only what happened on 29 October, but everything that has not happened since then. We are tired; tired of public institutions unable to coordinate, of promises that are not fulfilled and of aid that does not arrive. And, above all, a lack of absolute transparency. No one has clearly explained what happened that day. Did the flow alerts arrive? Why is there no public list of deceased? Why did the Tragsa company not let the specialized companies that were there clean the sewer well? Why, once again, does no one take responsibility? Meanwhile, administrations continue to tax families who have not even been able to return home. There are buildings without elevators, unusable garages and storage rooms, businesses that have not reopened, and every time there is a rain alert people relive the fear, the region goes into paralysis and it is a real trauma that continues to exist. And do not talk to us about aid when it has been civil society that has supported those affected. That is why we in this Parliament are asking for three things: truth, to know what failed; justice, so that the aid arrives now, and responsibility, so that this does not happen again. I appeal to society: Let us not normalize that a tragedy happens and no one pays the political price. It is time to demand a new, transparent, effective and humane institutional culture. Because when institutions fail, people suffer the consequences.

Mr President, as has been said before, this is the committee closest to the citizens and which reflects in some way the democratic quality in each country. Almost 23% of 2024 petitions came from Spain, it is the country from which they arrive the most. And one of the most recurrent issues is the rule of law. Here in this House and in the Commission there is immense hypocrisy: Hungary or Poland are pointed at with the finger while an accomplice silence is kept before what is happening in Spain. They put judicial independence at risk from the government, but nothing happens: You look the other way. In Catalonia, thousands of families have asked for something as basic as schooling their children in Spanish, the official language of all Spaniards. They have asked for it in the courts, they have won it and the Generalitat refuses to comply with the sentences. Where is the Commission or where are the defenders of the rule of law when citizens' language rights are trampled on? Defending the rule of law is also about protecting independent judges and families who only want to educate their children peacefully in their own language. From the ECR Group we say loud and clear: There is no democracy without law and there is no freedom without equality. Happy October 9 to all Valencians for good.

Mr President, Commissioner, let's see: Were Kodak reels banned when digital cameras came out? Were Blackberrys banned when the smartphones? Why do we have to ban the combustion engine to force people to buy an electric car? This is not a transition, it is an imposition. Europe has been talking about ecological transition for years, but it does so from carpeted offices, away from factory workshops and families who do not reach the end of the month. Do citizens who get up every morning and get up early to go to work know what they think? They think of their old car still working for them. They're thinking if they can buy a new one. And they think: Why are they forcing me to change what still serves me? And along the way we're leaving jobs behind, destroying industry and moving away from people. From the ECR Group we defend a Europe that does not punish, that does not impose, a Europe that listens, that accompanies and protects its productive fabric. Because Europe is not built with prohibitions, but with freedom, with work and with a lot of common sense.

Madam President, Prime Minister Frieden, Europe was built to unite free peoples, not to dilute identities. And yet today millions of citizens feel that this Europe no longer represents them. They are overwhelmed by bureaucracy, stifled by rules and, worse, do not see in Brussels a solution to their real problems: farmers who cannot sow, young people who have no future, industries that close, borders without control. Europe cannot be an ideological experiment or a mechanism of fiscal punishment. It must be what it was again: a cooperation project that defends our culture, our economy and, above all, the people who support them every day. From our group we believe in a strong Europe, but based on strong nations. And such a Europe does not impose, it cooperates; does not silence, listen; and protects the diversity of its Member States. We want another Europe; not less Europe, but a better, more humane, safer, freer Europe.

Madam President, Mrs von der Leyen, I share very little – or nothing – of what we have been told here today, but I share everything that farmers, ranchers and people on the street, in general, tell me. What about Europeans who are having a hard time? Those who feel increasingly insecure in their own streets, those who have been waiting for months for help that does not arrive, those who are rescued by their neighbors in the floods or those who put out the fires that are burning their land with their own hands? What happens when we have the problem within the European Union, when a Member State does not respect the separation of powers or when a system that is called democratic forgets the citizens and lives with its back to reality? What will the European Union do to help them?

Mr President, Commissioner, we said this in June: fires are put out in winter, with prevention, and helping the rural environment, farmers, ranchers and those who understand and know the mountains. But you didn't know... Couldn't it be prevented? High precipitations in spring are gasoline for the mountains in summer. So far in 2025, nearly 350 000 hectares have been burned in 223 fires, breaking the historical record of the European Forest Fire Information System. Meanwhile, regional and national administrations blame each other, without providing effective solutions. And again – again – civil society coming to the rescue again. Investing in prevention throughout the year equals less crisis management in summer. In the data age we have enough information to act accordingly and avoid human, agricultural, environmental and heritage losses. Let's act now or next year we will be in the same situation.

Madam President, Commissioner, fires do not start with fire, they start much earlier: When the field is abandoned, when the shepherds disappear, when the goats no longer climb the mountain, when the roads are covered, the firewalls are forgotten and the farmers throw in the towel. Europe and the governments talk a lot about the environment, but they have expelled those who cared for it, filled the field with papers, regulations that nobody understands and absurd sanctions. They forget that where there is a flock there is no weed; Where there is a tractor there is life. Today our ranchers and farmers are the only ones who act as firefighters without a uniform and do it for free. But, in the meantime, European funds do not arrive, aid does not compensate and the common agricultural policy punishes more than it supports. Do not put out a fire with speeches: It goes out with shepherds, with hands, with people who love the earth. If we do not protect those who care for the mountain, the mountain will not protect us, and then it will burn again.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, we are being sold the digital euro and digital identity as progress, but behind it is something much darker: full control over the citizens. This isn't just about technology, it's about power, about deciding how we spend, what we consume, where we are. It is the door to mass surveillance where our freedom is tied to a screen and who controls it. And the worst part is that there are no real guarantees; There is no talk of prohibiting their link to our fundamental rights or protecting cash as a guarantee of anonymity. A tool of obedience is designed, not of service. At the same time, we see content being censored in digital markets, innovation being curbed and SMEs being punished. What kind of Europe are they taking us to? Europe was born to protect freedoms, not to put barcodes on them. If we don't act now, tomorrow will be late. Freedom is not digitized, it is defended. And he defends himself here and now.

Mr President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, we can have the best car in the world, but if we put it down a goat road, we are not going anywhere. And that's what we do with energy in Europe: Get her down broken paths while we think we're champions of the future. Europe cannot afford to waste any more time. Today in Spain we already know what a total blackout is, what it is to see how inefficiency and political dogmatism dismantle the electricity system and punish the industry. This is intolerable. We cannot continue to criminalize some energy sources against others by ideology, while the network collapses, energy is wasted and our companies lose competitiveness. Enough of placing inexperienced politicians at the forefront of network operators. We want engineers, experts, people who know what they are doing, not magical or ideological solutions that escape logic, science and technology. Europe needs a modern, robust and connected network. Without that, the energy future is a chimera. Are we going to keep turning Europe off little by little or are we going to act now? Decide, because the next failure will be systemic. It's our responsibility.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, when in a State powers are withdrawn from judges to be handed over to prosecutors controlled by the Attorney General, put to the finger by the President of the Government, we are not talking about reforms, we are talking about institutional demolition: the Constitutional Court, the Court of Auditors, the General Council of the Judiciary, make the Attorney General of the State dependent, command the Council of State, instrumentalize the CNI, manipulate public opinion with the CIS, usurp the Bank of Spain, colonize the CNMC, the CNMV, AENA, Radiotelevisión Española, the Agencia EFE, Red Eléctrica, Indra, Renfe, Correos, Hispasat, Telefónica and even Paradores. What is happening in Spain is not a one-off crisis, it is a deliberate collapse of the balance of power. Today I appeal to parliamentarians of all colors. Party discipline is not a blank check, it never was, let alone now, with a president surrounded by corruption that uses the state as if it were a cortijo. The fight against corruption is an individual act, and I say this from my own experience. From civil society we cannot understand that there are not 176 honest deputies with values and a sense of state to stop this. And, while in Europe, what are the real mechanisms of the Union to stop a frontal attack on the Constitution of one of its Member States? Are we going to keep the symbolic gestures or are we going to defend authentic democracy? In addition, I express my sincere appreciation to the UCO and the Civil Guard.

Madam President, Commissioner, there are two strange things to see: a boat going to a communist country and a researcher thinking of staying in Europe. Europe wants to be the home of science, but for that it has to be a place where living, working and creating is not a risk sport. We are a continent with strong democracies: health, education, mobility... Yes, but can a young researcher afford an apartment in Amsterdam, Munich or Madrid on a three-year contract? We fund science with Horizon Europe, but we fill out papers and forms for researchers. Scientists spend more time crediting than researching. Moreover, we cannot allow our researchers to live in precariousness. We need more links with businesses, more employability and more synergies. If we want them to choose Europe, let us make Europe a real choice, not an unstable bet. Science needs freedom, continuity and stability. Without science there is no Europe.