What Nela spoke about.

Mr President, this report sets a nearly impossible task: naming and addressing the many crises and contradictions we face at UN level. Today, I want to draw attention to the ongoing genocide in Gaza and to those who risk their own lives to actually keep others alive. UNRWA provides education, medical support and aid to millions of Palestinians. It is a lifeline, and I was able to visit it myself in December. Yet, UNRWA is attacked, accused and ultimately banned by the Israeli Government, because when you remove the main humanitarian structure supporting the population in a catastrophe, the result is obvious: more suffering and more death – something that the Israeli Government seems to accept very willingly. But independent audits have repeatedly cleared UNRWA, confirming there is no credible replacement. Colleagues, there is only one legitimate demand to make tonight: UNRWA's mandate and funding must be fully reinstated.

Mr President, if you don't understand a story, you cannot spread it. Sudan is living the most brutal war the world has seen in decades. But because it's Africa, the conflict seems as too complicated, so it disappears. In reality, it's a simple story. One, there is a brutal civil war going on for years now, where sexual violence against women and girls is systematically used as a weapon. Two, international players like the United Arab Emirates treat Sudan as a gold mine. A weak Sudan means more resources. Three, our leaders prefer to look away to not piss off oil suppliers. Some in this House even are making sure to scrap the names of the enablers from any reports. Now you understand the story. So I urge you, the public: speak up about Sudan.

Madam President, after four years of brutal war in Ukraine, Russia is being welcomed back onto the world stage – the Paralympics last month, the upcoming global swimming championships and the Venice Biennale. Readmitting Russia to these events does nothing but send a cynical message of accepting war on our continent – a message of softening the sanctions because of what? Because it's been so long? This is crazy. Putin is still decimating a nation, and just because it has been over four years, it doesn't make it less illegal. It doesn't make Ukrainian suffering less real. Why let him normalise war under the guise of culture and sports? Let me be very clear: Russia does not deserve a pavilion at the Biennale. Russia does not deserve a European stage while kicking our European values with its feet. I called for this debate so we can show collectively that, in this House, we won't allow European culture to be exploited as a tool for war propaganda.

Madam President, colleagues, we all agree: for different reasons, right now Global Gateway does not work. Not for local populations, who are not consulted on how to actually implement projects sustainably, not for companies or implementing partners, who actually lack coherent benchmarks for success, and not for people, whose water sources are polluted by extraction every day and infrastructure projects without environmental standards. Also not for young people, who don't gain job prospects because skills transfer has not even been considered. And it does not work for us, the Parliament that has no oversight over the governance of these massive global investments. Many of these issues are addressed in the new Global Gateway report and that is good, but we need more. 'Do no significant harm' needs to be the Global Gateway principle. Local communities must be consulted, development money must not be misused to protect EU corporate profits. Colleagues, we still have many massive tasks before us. This report will only be to start and I am very much looking forward to working together with you on the next one.

Mr President, last year, Trump signed an executive order to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court. In other words, Trump made an official threat against a legal body investigating war crimes such as genocide and crimes against humanity. Trump clearly just doesn't like people investigating genocide. But colleagues, Commissioner, we do not care what Trump likes or does not like. We care about European citizens. We care about having a system that protects international law and the freedom of speech. Dear Commissioner, this is not the first time I'm asking you to activate the EU blocking statute, but I'm happy to do it again. With this, we can protect European lawyers, judges, journalists and citizens from the silencing attempts of foreign governments. What are you, and what are we all waiting for?

Mr President, dear colleagues, thank you for the many very interesting remarks during this debate. I am genuinely glad to see that the European Semester is a topic that sometimes stays in the shadows, but does attract so much attention in this House. Because, in the end, it touches on one of the most fundamental political questions: how we spend our money. The question is particularly timely. As we are entering negotiations on the next multiannual financial framework, we must not forget the elephant in the room, which is the national budgets. They represent the vast majority of public spending in Europe and are therefore the largest leverage that we have to shape economic and social change. This is precisely why coordinating how Member States use their budgets through the European Semester is so important. It is not only about coordination for its own sake. For me, it's also a step towards what actually should ultimately be our long-term objective – a truly European federal budget that allows us to address common challenges together. Because the reality is simple: the challenges we face are European and so must be the instruments that we use to address them. Now, colleagues, we may not agree on everything in this debate. That's for sure and is perfectly normal in a democratic Parliament. But I am glad to see that there is clear governance on several important points, which are also clearly reflected in the report we negotiated. First, many of you stressed the need for a stronger role of the European Parliament in the European Semester – it is very clear. And as country-specific recommendations become increasingly linked to EU funding in the next MFF, then democratic scrutiny by this House becomes even more essential. Second, we share the common goal of investing in people, education and skills. Third, there is a broad agreement that economic policy coordination must better reflect social considerations. So let me thank you now again for the constructive spirit we had in working together. I look forward to tomorrow's vote, and also, of course, the response that we receive from the Commission.

Madam President, dear colleagues, I am glad that we are having this debate on the European Semester report today. We talk a lot about the MFF, which is only 1 % of the EU GDP, but we don't talk about the elephant in the room: the national budget. This is arguably the biggest leverage that we have for change in terms of public money. While leading the negotiations on this report, I realised that in this debate, we keep falling for the same three illusions. Let me explain what it is. First, we keep falling for the illusion that we can tackle our common European challenges with separate national budgets. We all face the same problems here: energy, defence and industrial competition. But for some reason we still often try to solve them with 27 different national decisions. For example, look at defence spending. That is not my favourite topic, but we have to talk about it. Right now we operate three major competing fighting jets, roughly 12 different tanks and – hold on – 170 different weapon systems. All of these are spread across national armies that are too small on their own. So we get a weak defence system and a huge bill. Studies estimate that this lack of cooperation costs European taxpayers between EUR 18 billion and EUR 58 billion per year. In my report, I call for coordinated European defence spending that doesn't waste people's money. With the United States of EU, we could use this money for society we are defending. The second illusion: when did life actually become this expensive? Our rent, our groceries, our heating bills – everywhere you look, prices are going up. This did not happen overnight. This happened because for years we've been falling for the same comforting but futile illusion; the illusion that if we don't spend money today, we're somehow saving it. But we are not saving money. We're just postponing the bill. Take energy, for example. For years, we said investing in our own energy system was too expensive, so we delayed it. Now, every time there's geopolitical chaos – Ukraine, Iran, Venezuela – our prices go up. Because when Europe depends on the world's stability, our living costs depend on it too. That's why our real choice isn't between spending or saving; it's between being dependent or independent. To be independent, we need to acknowledge that the challenges we face are European. So the solutions must be European too. And again – that is the promise of the United States of Europe. Less dependency and more power to stand on our own. The power to protect our living costs. The third illusion: we often waste our money by believing in the illusion that investing in people is nice to have, and not a necessity. I feel sometimes we are so busy discussing military startups and new technologies that we forget something very, very simple. None of these things would even exist without people. It's the people who design technologies. It's the people who build companies. And it's the people who make the economy grow. Everyone's favourite buzzword nowadays is 'competitiveness'. But what actually makes us competitive? Right – it's the people. Programmes like Erasmus already allow millions of Europeans to learn from each other every year. Now we need to build on that. A European approach for Europeans. The United States of Europe. Dear colleagues, I'm very much looking forward to the debate today and hear your opinions about how we are going to take this forward.

Mr President, nearly three years into the brutal war in Sudan, civilians are still paying the price not only of violence, but also of international inaction. As lawmakers, our responsibility is very clear: we must stop treating this war as a distant internal conflict. This is a proxy war fuelled by external actors and militias that profit from chaos. The EU must support peace negotiations that genuinely put Sudanese people first and cut financial support to those blocking the ceasefire. That includes designating the Rapid Support Forces as a terrorist organisation rather than hesitating over one individual at a time. Europe must choose: politics driven only by strategic advantage or the courage to put civilian lives first. To every European citizen, I urge you: speak up about Sudan.

Mr President, if Trump can snap his fingers and take rights away from European citizens on our very own soil, then something is wrong. This is not hypothetical. Trump has placed two Europeans, one UN official and one ICC judge, on a sanction list – a sanction list that is usually reserved for terrorists – simply because they did their job. They insisted that international law be applied to everyone, also to Netanyahu and companies that are benefiting from the ongoing genocide. If Trump can attack people with public visibility, imagine what happens to everyday citizens speaking up for Palestine. Only a united Europe can fence off American bullying – only a united Europe can protect our courts and our citizens. Some will try to convince you of the contrary, but people do want the United States of Europe, and Volt is here to make it happen.

Mr President, as I speak here, innocent people in Sudan continue to be executed, bombed, raped or left to starve, for over two years now. Yet today is the first time we are talking about the extent of this crisis in this House. Let us say it how it is – the suffering of people in African countries has been normalised for far too long. The world has grown numb, as if starvation and violence are somehow part of the continent's identity. They are not. What is happening in Sudan is not a conflict between two equal sides. External actors like the United Arab Emirates are fuelling the violence because a weakened Sudan is easier to exploit for resources, and the Sudanese people become collateral in someone else's power games. Today, that collateral means 14 million people displaced, hundreds of thousands of people trapped and starving, and women and girls raped as a weapon of war. The EU cannot be a bystander to the genocide warnings. Not again. The supposed ceasefire we just learned about is urgently needed, but lasting peace has to go hand in hand with accountability for war crimes and rule of law. We already see Trump rolling up with his next peace plan on his delusional mission for a Nobel Peace Prize, but once again he is ignoring Sudanese voices and instead striking deals with the UAE – the very actors destabilising the country. This has failed before and will fail again. Instead, let's push for a civilian-led peace process. Let's finally act like the EU's values mean something.

Madam President, good morning everyone, our cultural sovereignty is not for sale, our film industry is not for sale. The President of the US talks about 'making Hollywood great again', but the problem isn't investing in the American film industry, it's trying to do it on our dime and against our laws. Threatening Europe's cultural rules is not acceptable. Our laws protect creators, children and independent media. Let me be clear: culture will never, ever be a bargaining chip in any trade negotiation. President von der Leyen, we need to send a clear message across the Atlantic: Europe will not back down. First, European citizens decide what rules govern their culture. Second, our audiovisual sector as a source of jobs and creativity must be defended. Our sovereignty and credibility are on the line. Culture is key to preserving our diversity and Europe's soft power. The AVMSD is not just a law on paper, it's a shield for Europe's culture. When we updated it in 2018, we made a deliberate choice: protect European works in a fast-changing media world, keep harmful content away from our children and guarantee independent media regulators. Yes, this means big platforms like Netflix or Disney+ must invest in European stories, but it also creates the blockbusters of tomorrow right here in Europe. No, the AVMSD is not a barrier, it's a shield. No, the AVMSD is not a distortion of trade, it opens doors for European talents. Look at the success of Borgen, Lupin or Money Heist: these are all European works that have reached global audiences, mostly through big platforms like Netflix. If it was not for the AVMSD, major audiovisual platforms – which are mainly American – would probably not invest so much in European productions. Given the power that these platforms wield, we must make sure European stories remain visible in Europe. The sustainability of our audiovisual sector depends on it, as does our cultural diversity. Mr Trump, attacking European rules to protect Hollywood is hypocritical. If you really care about American creators, meet them, talk to the guilds. They told us last May, when we were in LA, that 100 % tariffs on foreign films is a bad idea. Many American productions export to Europe because of lower costs: it's business, not a culture threat. Art and culture thrive by opening doors, not closing them. European and American cinema have always grown together. Let's keep it that way. Now, I would like to thank my CULT colleagues for their support and introduce my oral question to the Commission on the AVMSD obligations in the transatlantic dialogue. The administration of US President Donald Trump has recently targeted as foreign trade barriers the provisions of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD) applying to streaming industries. In particular, it has focussed on investment obligations aimed at promoting European content and cultural diversity and a requirement for the catalogues of providers of on-demand audiovisual media services to meet a quota of at least 30 % of European works and give these works appropriate prominence. Furthermore, within the context of the ongoing trade negotiations, President Trump also stated his intention to impose a 100 % tax on films made outside the United States. First, the AVMSD is a cornerstone of the EU's audiovisual policy, aiming to create a single market for audiovisual media services in the EU while promoting cultural diversity. Does the Commission consider that backtracking on the principles of the AVMSD would be detrimental to the European culture model given the context of very strong international competition within the audiovisual media sector? And second, is the Commission in favour of recognising the crucial importance of the AVMSD in defending Europe's cultural sovereignty and diversity and the soft power of the EU, both in its negotiation with the United States and also in evaluating the AVMSD prior to its potential review in 2026?

Madam President, imagine this: you are called into the office and told 'we have to let you go'. You ask why and they answer 'headquarters decided'. No warning, no explanation, no chance to say a word. Yet, you are the one paying the price for decisions made miles away by people who have never set foot into your work. Decisions that change your life and your future. That is not fair and that is not the Europe we believe in. That's why we changed the rules. With this new law, actually, European Works Councils will finally give workers a real voice. No more decisions taken in Paris that destroy jobs in Berlin without talking to workers first. From now on, when a decision could affect your job, your pay, your health – no matter where it's taken – your voice must be heard. And when those decisions are taken, at least 40 % of the room must be women, and that's always a better decision then, no? When workers are heard, companies do better. They find solutions, they avoid layoffs and they protect people, not just profits. This is what Europe is about: making sure our citizens are heard and protected wherever they live. Making sure that borders are never an excuse to leave responsibilities somewhere else. So, I think we altogether and Dennis Radtke did a very good job, and thank you for this.

Madam President, Why is it that we talk so much about and so little about the Palestinians? You notice that I almost miss the words, today, October 7, when I think of the suffering of the October 7 massacre and when I think of the suffering of the genocide that began thereafter. How is it that a picture of the Israeli military has been almost uncritically taken over in the German media for two years – this narrative of picture until Tagesschau – Do Palestinian voices have much to say? And now Trump's peace deal: It is not Palestinians who should decide their own country from the outset, but a so-called supervisory board under the US president and Tony Blair. This has colonial undertones that are hard to miss. I wonder: Why is freedom of self-determination not the basic principle when we discuss the future of Palestine and Israel? The EU stands for freedom and peace. Now it has to be proven that this applies to all people. Yes, the negotiations are a glimmer of hope. But it needs the pressure and support of the EU. There can be no freedom without self-determination. Palestinians have the right to their own state, their own land and an independent government.

Madam President, young people do not care about politics. All that they care about is Instagram and TikTok. Really? The truth is, young people around the world are flooding their streets to demand change now. In Serbia, students demonstrated for democratic freedom. In Nepal, they stood up against corruption and nepotism. In Morocco, they demand investment in education and also healthcare. What about young Europeans? Far from not caring about politics, they are protesting against climate change and for global justice. Thousands marched only yesterday in Brussels for a sustainable future. Millions took to the streets all across Europe demanding peace and justice for Gaza. Young people are at the front line of today's most important battles, but too often they are being disregarded. We need to listen and to take action now. It's on us to build their future they are fighting for. Colleagues, I'm not only speaking as a politician here – I'm also speaking as a former teacher and as a mother. Let's stop asking whether young people care about politics, and start proving that politics cares about young people.

Madam President, have you noticed how military language has become very common these days? You just heard it again this morning, I guess, and you may like that or even dislike that but the truth is, our daily lives are being weaponised. Across Europe we see how hybrid warfare undermines our societies. Russia's disinformation tries to destroy our trust in democracy itself. If we want to defend Europe, we must strengthen the foundations of our democracy. Culture is one of these foundations – it's how we express free thought, the way we connect and our source of identity and belonging. Independent media is another foundation. Reliability and stability in times of disinformation is how we actually grow – and that is not a given. And, of course, education. For active citizenship and critical thinking, basic and civic education are a must. There is no Democracy Shield without these foundations. Defending Europe means more than stopping military attacks – it means strengthening and protecting democracy from within and investing in people.

Mr President! What does it mean when media freedom erodes in the heart of Europe? With the EMFA, the EU has made a clear commitment to safeguarding media freedom. But according to Reporters Without Borders, journalists in Germany are increasingly under fire. They are experiencing attacks on the open street from the right, they are experiencing censorship, they are experiencing political pressure, especially when they report on the genocide in Gaza. Critical reporting is not protected, but specifically prevented. Only this week a case was brought to me by a journalist who tried to place a very critical article in very established and actually known for critical journalism newspapers. He was rejected everywhere except for the Friday, Probably because of fear of backlash. This borders on self-censorship and that is highly alarming. The report of the Reporters Without Borders must ring the alarm bells. Media freedom is not only threatened in the periphery, it is crumbling at its core. The credibility of the EU now depends on whether we are prepared to defend media freedom at home and elsewhere throughout Europe.

Madam President, what is the most important EU value to you? To that question, young Europeans answered: human rights, democracy and peace. Eighty years after World War II, these values are still our most important heritage. But as Russia's invasion of Ukraine has shown, peace and democracy are not a given – they call for a commitment. A commitment to not remain silent when extremist regimes deliberately starve civilians and commit war atrocities. A commitment from democratic forces to raise strong firewalls against the far right in Europe. And a commitment to remain vigilant when our allies progressively turn their back on democracy, censoring researchers and activists or threatening the rights of minorities and women. But what does this actually mean for us? It means we cannot compromise on the freedom of our artists, our universities, our citizens. Europe must remain a hub of creativity, of knowledge and also of democracy, providing equal opportunities for all. It means we cannot let foreign forces interfere in our democratic processes, be it in the ballots or on social media. And it means we cannot be complicit when fundamental rights are being walked over, all in this very Union. Turning a blind eye would be a betrayal to the lessons our grandparents painfully learned. Our European Union youth is rightfully demanding us to stay loyal to this heritage. More than a celebration, today's anniversary is a reminder of Europe's responsibility.

Mr President, together with my CULT shadow rapporteurs, I reviewed the DG EAC, the EAC Executive Agency and the Translation Centre. The Translation Centre is essential for multilingual work across all our institutions. We welcome improvements in public procurement, gender parity and exploration of AI and machine translation. Regarding the Commission, we appreciate DG EAC's work on Erasmus+, the Solidarity Corps and Creative Europe. The discharge exercise showed again for Erasmus+, the best-known EU programme, that demand far outweighs the provision in every sector. In 2023, EAC frontloaded EUR 100 million to support Ukraine through Erasmus+, an important but exceptional response. Going forward, we must integrate candidate countries more and increase the budget. We also observed frontloading in Creative Europe for two years and now are seeing a return to a steady growth and welcome the additional reinforcement. This programme is the livelihood of the cultural sector in Europe and saved many artists and freelancers over the pandemic.

Madam President, Commissioner, dear Glenn, I thank you for your statement and your great commitment to making this a very co-creative process. I really appreciate that, and I believe we are on the right track, but let's not underestimate the challenge we face here. There is a hybrid war knocking at our doors. Storytelling, clicks on social media and censorship are weaponised against civilians. To withstand this, we need vibrant civil societies. We need feelings of belonging together and courage to speak back. This is what culture is actually for. We need a European agenda for culture to protect our pluralistic democracies and societies. The culture sector needs security when it comes to plannability, freedom of expression, access and representation. Let's commit to improving the condition for cultural workers. We now have the opportunity to set very clear guidelines. First, we need to guarantee artistic freedom. The European Media Freedom Act has been a great success in preserving journalists' independence, and now we need the same level of legislation to protect freedom of expression for artists and creators. Second, we need solid and sustainable funding for the cultural sector. As we are now discussing the next MFF, let's secure at least 2 % of the overall budget for culture. This is a matter of preparedness, of resilience and of defence. Lastly, we need a European strategy on cultural relations and to understand Europe as a global cultural actor, not with a paternalistic worldview, but as a key to foreign policy based on mutual respect. Let's make this happen.

Mr President, dear Commissioner, it's time to acknowledge the reality. An unreliable US, an emboldened Russia and hybrid warfare knocking at our doors. But let's be clear: peace isn't just secured by military alone, it's safeguarded by people upholding our democracies. To protect European democracy, we must strengthen it against these destabilisation efforts. This is why we need widespread, high‑quality education in Europe. Everyone has has the right to be active citizens, be trained for coming changes and leverage their potential against destabilisation. Many of the high costs Europe faces today are a result of failing to prepare for them in the past in time, whether on defence, energy or climate. When we act too late, we end up paying dearly. So one thing is very clear: we need a Union of Skills now, so thank you very much for that. Investing in people is not just a choice; it's a necessity, and an urgent one. Let's be even more ambitious. When we say people need training, let's make a wider training directive. When we say strengthen Erasmus, let's significantly increase the budget. When we say active citizenship and hybrid war, let's define strategic targets of civic education.

Madam President, 'Sigma Boy'. Do you know 'Sigma Boy'? If you are an eleven-year-old girl in, for example, Germany or even Ukraine, you probably do. 'Sigma Boy' is a viral Russian trope used on social media that communicates patriarchal and pro-Russian worldviews. It's most popular with young teenagers and only one example of Russian infiltration of popular discourse through social media. Russia has understood how to embed these ideas in a society: target young Ukrainians on their phones, change the stories of Ukrainians telling their own society. Last week, Ukraine's Minister of Culture pointed out to me that cultural heritage does not only include history books and also museums, but Ukrainian language, music and also current Ukrainian influencers. Russia targets this all. Here, the EU must stand in strong support and target even these subtle infiltrations and falsifications.

Mr President, where do we go when we do not know something? Well – online. For me personally, it's Google, some might also go on TikTok. Particularly for the younger generation, social media platforms are the place to gather information also on politics. Social media is where elections are decided nowadays. We cannot deny this, but we need to respond to this. We need to make sure that this does not compromise the democratic process, that the algorithmic logic of which content does well is not a deciding factor on electoral outcomes. With TikTok we risk overseeing the Trojan horse coming for our democracy. Yes, parties and politicians should meet people where they are and speak to them in a way they want to be spoken to. But no, that does not mean that facts become relative or that truth is a question of the most clicked video. One first step was the DSA calling out negative effects on elections. So for the Bundestag elections: Let's not talk about pet bans and gender craze, but about climate crisis and social justice.

Mr President, as the Draghi report outlines, the question of skills is not just one of preparing the labour force for changing demands, but also about giving people the tools to adapt and engage with a changing world and benefit from new technologies. This is what competitiveness should mean. As a teacher, I have great respect for traditional classrooms, but classrooms are only just the beginning. At the moment, only 40 % of European adults train every year. This is very far from the 60 % target that the EU set itself to reach by 2030. Training must be a lifelong commitment. Lifelong learning, development, developing digital skills, must be a fundamental right and not just a privilege reserved for a few. This isn't just about preparing for tomorrow's jobs. It's about empowering everyone to thrive in a world that is always evolving. So what does this actually mean? First, we need to address the lack of investment in skills. Every euro spent on training is a euro invested in our economy and society. This needs to be reflected in public budget decisions. Second, we need to establish an individual right to training for every European worker. But beyond this, we must break down the barriers that prevent skills and qualifications being recognised across borders. Let us make lifelong learning the new norm!

Mr President, dear colleagues, some ask 'what does the EU offer me personally?' Here is one of the EU's most successful offers: Erasmus. Erasmus is the European success story of public outreach, but also of dismantling borders and drawing Europe closer together. National Erasmus agencies were telling me just last week the programme is already now underfunded. Every euro that is cut now results directly into student mobility that we cannot support. Last year, Erasmus mobility requests of EUR 833 million in Germany alone, with a budget of EUR 418 million. That is almost twice as much as we could provide. There is a huge deficit in our Erasmus budget already and the Council tries to cut here. I am happy to see that Mr Negrescu receives a mandate to ask for funding increase of EUR 70 million to this extremely popular programme. This must be the EP's priority.

Madam President, this is true – I saw it on TikTok. Until a few weeks ago, I was working as a teacher back in Germany and that is what my 16-year-old students would tell me on a regular basis. As a teacher it was my job to train young people to recognise and also withstand disinformation. And believe me, that wasn't easy. I was not only confronted with young people telling me that they believed everything they saw on the internet, but also with their parents and that is, in times of hybrid wars, an actual security risk. A resilient society needs access to free public and factual information. This is our responsibility to our youth. We make sure that independent broadcasting remains available and is not at the whim of political moods in our Member States. If we don't actively protect and also foster the important work of independent journalists in Europe, all 16-year-olds will not be able to access reliable information and that is the future we are facing.