| Rank | Name | Country | Group | Speeches | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Lukas Sieper | Germany DEU | Non-attached Members (NI) | 390 |
| 2 |
|
Juan Fernando López Aguilar | Spain ESP | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 354 |
| 3 |
|
Sebastian Tynkkynen | Finland FIN | European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) | 331 |
| 4 |
|
João Oliveira | Portugal PRT | The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) | 232 |
| 5 |
|
Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis | Lithuania LTU | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 227 |
All Contributions (51)
Cohesion policy (joint debate)
Madam President, Climate justice, beautiful housing, thriving landscapes – what else is cohesion funding going to pay for? Let's be honest: A large part of the problems that we now have to solve arduously, we have caused ourselves. No one is forcing us to achieve climate neutrality by 2050; This goal has been set apart from reality. relocation of production, carbon leakage, investment outflows are a first consequence; Hundreds of thousands of jobs are lost. The de-industrialization of the continent has already begun. The housing crisis is also homemade. Anyone who lets millions of immigrants, asylum seekers and foreigners into the continent should not be surprised that housing is no longer sufficient. Cohesion funds are not designed to cure bad policies; Make rural areas worth living again. The simple and straightforward allocation of cohesion funds is the only sensible proposal made here today.
Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review (debate)
Mr President! According to Ursula von der Leyen, almost 800 billion euros are to be spent on the EU's ability to fight in war. Anyone who has followed her speech during her visit to Bulgaria last week wonders with what tenacity and speed the rearmament is to be launched. The Bulgarian arms industry is not only a reason for Bulgarian national pride, but also for European pride. Almost 60 of the 800 billion announced will come from cohesion funds. Instead of kindergartens, armament factories are built in rural areas; the village rehabilitation must give way to the drone test; At best, there will be infrastructure to transport the tanks still to be built to future war zones. We are preparing here for a war that only the EU wants, no one else. A real strategic challenge would be to strengthen the regions and thus make Europe a sustainable and livable continent again.
European Citizens' Initiative 'Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures' (debate)
Thank you for the question. Why am I not surprised to be asked this question? I would like to make a clear distinction between immigration to a new country and a minority that has actually lived in an area for centuries. That's a big difference. You know that too, and I don't think I need to explain it to you. Immigration is different from a national minority.
European Citizens' Initiative 'Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures' (debate)
Madam President, Poppy cake, tolerance, snowflake: We associate all these terms with Silesia, an ancient cultural landscape. In the Polish voivodships of Opole and Silesia, there are well over 600,000 Silesians – 200,000 of whom have indicated that they speak mostly German in everyday life. And yet the protection of the homeland is not progressing so well. Bilingual place signs are not or only after a long waiting period, the German lessons at the schools are treated stepmotherly. But this is where cohesion funding can help. They should be used to ensure that the expansion of German teaching finally progresses and that the village school infrastructure is secured. They must be used so that Europe's cultural wealth is no longer lost. They are to be used so that the handling of the veils in Poland can become a model for the whole of Europe. We therefore fully support the European Citizens' Initiative.
Lessons from Budapest Pride: the urgent need for an EU wide anti-discrimination law and defending fundamental rights against right-wing attacks (topical debate)
Madam President, Do you want to make Hungary a place you would like to return to? This is what exile Hungarians of the so-called Free University of Budapest ask for, who wish for a left-woke country and have therefore fled to the completely run-down Berlin. Together with leftists from ‘Aktivistenbus’, they drove from Germany to this year’s Pride Parade in Hungary’s capital. Even the dedicated EU Commissioner for Climate and Gender Equality, Ms Hadja Lahbib, is said to have been spotted there, along with 70 left-wing and green MEPs. Was that good? In any case, it was an interference in internal Hungarian affairs. Participation in the Pride Parade will not be punished by Orbán. Orbán had previously stated that the protection of children is higher than the protection of alleged sexual minorities. But there is one thing we should always keep in mind: If you like dragqueens and table dance for children, you will feel at home in Germany. Many Germans don't do that anymore. They flee to Hungary and turn their backs on their homeland forever.
Lessons from Budapest Pride: the urgent need for an EU wide anti-discrimination law and defending fundamental rights against right-wing attacks (topical debate)
Madam President, Do you want to make Hungary a place you would like to return to? This is what exile Hungarians of the so-called Free University of Budapest ask for, who wish for a left-woke country and have therefore fled to the completely run-down Berlin. Together with leftists from ‘Aktivistenbus’, they drove from Germany to this year’s Pride Parade in Hungary’s capital. Even the dedicated EU Commissioner for Climate and Gender Equality, Ms Hadja Lahbib, is said to have been spotted there, along with 70 left-wing and green MEPs. Was that good? In any case, it was an interference in internal Hungarian affairs. Participation in the Pride Parade will not be punished by Orbán. Orbán had previously stated that the protection of children is higher than the protection of alleged sexual minorities. But there is one thing we should always keep in mind: If you like dragqueens and table dance for children, you will feel at home in Germany. Many Germans don't do that anymore. They flee to Hungary and turn their backs on their homeland forever.
From institution to inclusion: an EU action plan for deinstitutionalisation, family- and community-based care (debate)
Mr President! Almost 200,000 people with disabilities live in homes in Germany alone, more than 200,000 children do not live with their parents, over 800,000 people in need of care in institutions. The trend is increasing in all areas. This extra-domestic care already costs well over €70 billion per year in Germany. The European Commission therefore rightly wants to remedy this situation. Inclusion should be promoted by a care in the institution. It means a return to family. Sounds good, but it's not that easy. Germany has been doing everything in its power to destroy functioning family structures for decades. Every second marriage is divorced, children barely born. Financial or even ideal support for families? Misrepresentation. We finally need a policy for families that deserves this name – a policy that focuses not on self-proclaimed minority groups, but on those who really need help. We need to support families so that we can live in this inclusion again, so that we can finally take care of our children and grandparents ourselves again.
Strengthening rural areas in the EU through cohesion policy (debate)
Madam President, The shop around the corner, good childcare, dwarf schools, spacious living space and employment opportunities within easy reach: This is what families in Europe need and want. In Germany, we have been experiencing a new desire for the countryside since 2017. More and more families are moving to small towns and villages. But rural areas must be developed accordingly in order for them to have a future. 270 billion euros will flow into our rural regions over the next four years. These funds will no longer be used, as in the last legislature, for the fight against the right. These funds are finally being spent on good living conditions. With these funds, we will be able to ensure that it is not only the much conjured up right to stay, but above all the Possibility to stay There is. This gives young families the opportunity to live a good life. Then a new home emerges from Landlust.
Ninth report on economic and social cohesion (debate)
No text available
Adoption of the proposal for a Parenthood Regulation (debate)
Madam President, Baby Sara can't help it: Who gave birth to them is not known. Who are your biological parents, only partially? The only thing that is certain is that two women who have married each other in a Western EU country want to enforce gay marriage in Eastern Europe as well. Bulgaria, the country of origin of one of the two women, does not yet allow such a same-sex marriage. Whether the mother of baby Sara is Bulgarian is unknown. Nevertheless, Sara was granted citizenship there after a ruling by the European Court of Justice. Ursula von der Leyen is pleased. She claims: If you are a parent in one country, you have to be a parent in any other country, only then can the LGBTQ agenda be enforced. Quote: Ursula von der Leyen. Today's debate is by no means about strengthening parenthood across borders, but only about ideology-driven gender mainstreaming: Anyone can declare themselves parents anywhere and at any time. Let us not allow this encroachment on the EU, let us strengthen our families, let us protect our children!
Roadmap for Women`s Rights (debate)
Mr President! Reem Alsalem is not allowed to participate today. The UN Special Envoy for Violence against Women and Girls was invited by our FEMM Committee to attend today's major conference in New York. What is their offense? Years ago, she was so bold to ask what it looks like with a gender-responsive interpretation of Sharia law. But it got worse. After the introduction of the self-determination law in Germany, she addressed Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock in a letter. It marked the potential abuse and erosion of the legally possible gender change in Germany as misogynistic – the receipt now followed. The oh so tolerant comrades-in-arms in the FEMM Committee requested their invitation to tender, which then also took place promptly. So our self-proclaimed female champions are serious about political participation and the same representation of women. Not even in their own female ranks are other opinions tolerated. Reem Alsalem – remember the name of the real fighter for women’s rights!
Supporting the EU’s most vulnerable regions against devastating effects of climate change, such as the recent cyclone hitting La Réunion (debate)
Mr President! Dreamy beaches, tropical climate, volcanic landscapes, lively music, Creole dances, delicious food – who doesn’t want to go on holiday to the Vanilla Islands? One of them is the island of Reunion. It is located in the Indian Ocean and is a French enclave. A holiday there is breathtaking – the island advertises on its website. But – this is also reported there – the island is characterised by cyclones. These are fascinating and feared, but also not infrequently, and therefore the rules of conduct for the occurrence of cyclones are graduated into five escalation stages – from yellow to blue – supplied immediately on this page. Just one such cyclone searched the island last week. Wind speeds of over 200 kilometers per hour caused floods, power and water outages, and in fact, unfortunately, five deaths are to be lamented. But what does the EU make of it? Instead of helping unbureaucratically, as France immediately did, the EU is hurrying to establish a link between this weather event and man-made climate change. Instead of simply accepting that cyclones have always shaped the island, we hear the eternally same lyre of man-made climate change. The climate is always changing. None of us can say exactly or even calculate how great our influence is on it. None of us can answer the question whether our measures to supposedly protect our environment, our weather, our homeland do not even harm. In any case, we will be harmed if we allow democratically elected prime ministers such as Călin Georgescu in Romania not to take office and even to be excluded from re-election. There is a storm coming up in Europe, and this is the storm that Europe must fear, because it can very quickly develop into a cyclone, the consequences of which are likely to be dramatic.
Regional Emergency Support: RESTORE (debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen! It is good and right that the European Commission, with the RESTORE programme, will be able to provide faster and less bureaucratic assistance in the event of natural disasters in the future. We have seen devastating flooding across Europe in recent years. Hundreds of people drowned in these floods. In this case, this has not always been the direct result of the changing climate, but of the failure of the authorities: The population has not been protected, although there have been sufficient warnings from the weather authorities. RESTORE funds must also be used to bring the people of Europe to safety in such extreme weather. This was missed in both the Ahr Valley and Valencia. The Hurricane On the French island of Mayotte, countless people have died. Only after the debris has been cleared away will their number be known. Here, too, we demand quick, unbureaucratic help. But on the positive side: The extensive resources of the RESTORE programme can be used in the future to restore Europe's biodiversity, which is no longer found in some regions. The funds can ensure that conservative economic principles regain their weight. Sustainability, resilience, domestic agriculture - all this has been lost in recent years. In rural areas, we can succeed in revitalising municipalities and small towns, but also in rural agriculture – and become the job engine here. This would allow us to slow down the ongoing rural exodus and finally make rural areas home again.
Strengthening children’s rights in the EU - 35th anniversary of the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (debate)
The fact that the state intervenes where children are abused and where children are neglected by their own parents is perfectly correct. But when we see the numbers – from Norway, or I just mentioned the example of the Netherlands, where 2,000 children were taken out of the families because the parents allegedly wrongly received a child supplement, and the government backtracked and said: We were wrong, but you were right to receive the child allowance, which was a supplement to the child allowance. These children did not return to their families. These were mostly families who lived in cramped housing conditions and where it was simply said: Well, the kids are gone now. They've been out of the family for three or four years now, and they're not coming back to the family. This is the injustice that has happened to the children.
Strengthening children’s rights in the EU - 35th anniversary of the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen! Anchoring special children's rights is always a dangerous thing. The State shall have powers which are the primary parental right; And if he doesn't get them voluntarily, he just takes them. We have seen many examples of this in recent years. In the Netherlands, almost 2,000 children have been taken from families as part of the so-called child surcharge affair. Their whereabouts remain unexplained to this day. Even if the parents were subsequently informed that the whole state concerted action had been wrongly carried out, the children have not seen their parents again to this day. Let's look at Norway. The state authorities have now taken more than 7 percent of all children from families, in more than 70 percent of all cases without the consent of their parents. Here – in Norway – it may be sufficient that the children were raised in traditional gender roles or, for example, do not have their own children’s room. In Germany, too, more than 65,000 children do not live with their parents, and the trend is increasing. The self-determination law, which came into force in Germany on 1 November, and the heated discussion about children's rights in the Basic Law will only exacerbate this situation. Each of us wants children to be able to grow up protected and protected. And only where this is not the case can the state intervene. In all other cases: Hands off our kids! Raising children is a parent's first concern. Let us strengthen our families, let us create the material and ideal conditions so that children can stay with their parents, and let us defend ourselves against the encroachment of the state, which has lost nothing, but also nothing, in the education of our children.
Urgent need to tackle the gender pay gap (debate)
No text available
International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, Today is another day set by the United Nations, the International Day against Violence against Women. These days of remembrance are indeed suitable to be honest at least once a year, to address things once a year that we do not want to experience in Europe. And so today would be appropriate to name the true causes and the terrible effects of violence against women. And then – this would be the logical consequence – to say clearly and unequivocally why violence against women has not diminished but increased in Europe in recent years. In Germany alone, 360 women were victims of femicide last year – that is, killed because they are a woman. In addition, there are nearly 600 attempted killings. Every day, the Federal Criminal Police Office counts 25 sex crimes committed against women by refugees and those seeking protection. Compared to the previous year, this is an increase of almost 27%. And so it is not surprising that now more than half of all women in Germany say that they no longer dare to take to the streets alone in the evening hours. But not only the public, but also the domestic violence is exploding. More than 180,000 cases were reported last year in Germany alone, with an increasing trend. About a third of the suspects in connection with this domestic violence do not have a German passport. The women's shelters in Germany are overcrowded and more than 13,000 places are missing. More than two-thirds of women seeking shelter in women's shelters have a migrant background. But what happens in Germany on the day of violence against women? A demonstration against violence against FLINTA, women, lesbians, intersexuals, non-binaries, transsexuals and agents will be held in Düsseldorf – for all those who would like to be a woman but are not always one. Let us finally name the real causes, the real perpetrators, and demand remigration, millions of remigration.
The devastating floods in Spain, the urgent need to support the victims, to improve preparedness and to fight the climate crisis (debate)
Madam President, ladies and gentlemen! We mourn with the bereaved of the dead of the storm disaster of Spain. More than 220 people have died in the devastating floods. But we are also angry – angry because we have seen again in Spain that the population has not been warned in time of a massive storm. How can it be that already at half past eight in the morning the national weather authority declares red alert and then nothing happens? Only after another ten hours came the request of the civil protection authority in Valencia not to leave the house under any circumstances. For more than 220 people, this call came too late. We experienced the same thing in Germany three years ago: Despite a strong warning from the weather authorities, the civil protection authorities reacted far too late. Nearly 200 people died at the time. The consequences can still be felt and seen in the Ahr Valley today. Our national governments must finally take the protection of the civilian population seriously. We need a quick and, above all, unbureaucratic mobilization for such emergencies. This is the only way to protect our people in the long run.
Taxing the super-rich to end poverty and reduce inequalities: EU support to the G20 Presidency’s proposal (topical debate)
Mr President! Today we are talking about taxing billionaires even higher. I think this is a very daring project. So-called rich people in Germany are already paying taxes of 45 percent, and the government has announced that it will increase the tax rate even further next year. But what would I think of instead? Instead of continuing to work on the tax screw, we should finally start to continue taxing companies in Europe. Google, Amazon, Microsoft use tax havens. These companies make billions in profits every year and are not taxed in Europe. Let's finally close these tax havens. Let's make taxes fairer. And if that's not enough, there's a second way: Let us finally fight corruption, which also prevails here in the EU.
Need to fight the systemic problem of gender-based violence in Europe (debate)
Mr President! It is good that the European Parliament has decided to adopt far-reaching rules to protect women from violence. Forced marriages and genital mutilation are to be punished as crimes in the future. FEMM said that Europe should become the first continent to end violence against women. Unfortunately, we are far from that. Every year, more than 3,000 women are killed in Europe, and hundreds of thousands are victims of public or domestic violence. In Germany alone, the number of crimes against sexual self-determination has tripled since 2013. More than 100 gang rapes took place last year in Berlin alone. We must finally have the courage to clearly state why these crimes have increased so much in recent years. We have been experiencing uncontrolled mass immigration since 2015. The vast majority are young Muslim men. We would have to be blind if we did not associate this Islamic mass immigration with the rising violence against women. Let's call the child by name. This is the first step towards making women feel safe again in Europe.
Outcome of G20 ministerial meeting in Rio-de-Janeiro and fighting inequality (debate)
Madam President, Ladies and gentlemen, even if there aren't many left! Representatives of the G20 countries met in Rio de Janeiro to discuss hunger and inequality. An impressive backdrop was the port of Galpão da Cidadania, where the African slave trade was once conducted. It is dramatic that, to date, inequality and poverty have not been effectively tackled. To date, more than 750 million people are suffering from hunger, 150 million of whom are children. But let's look at Europe. We are witnessing that in the EU, through a failed policy, exactly the things are happening that we want to fight in other parts of the world. Pollutant emissions in the rest of the world are rising, partly because we are relocating our production abroad. We produce less food; At the same time, the prices for these products go through the roof. Poverty in Europe is on the rise: 8% of EU citizens are considered poor and one in five are at risk of poverty. Child poverty is particularly alarming, with one in four children being poor. So before we talk about fighting inequality all over the world, let us fight for the fight against inequality in our European countries!