Speeches

Madam President, colleagues, after the horrors of the Second World War, our forefathers said 'never again'. Yet today in Gaza, genocide is unfolding before our eyes. This is not anti-Semitism: this is the declared policy of Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir, Smotrich and their extremist government. We present ourselves as the guardians of international law, yet when political conviction clashes with convenience, when human dignity clashes with commercial interests, we compromise. We look away. So let us act. Because every day we allow the Israel Association Agreement, every day we allow trade and arms to flow, we betray the promise of 'never again'. Because, colleagues, 'never again' must mean something, or else it would mean nothing at all.

Mr President, Ahmadreza Jalali is not a prisoner – he is a hostage held by a regime of executioners. Iran is not just violating human rights – it is waging a war on them. But Europe's voice is often too timid, too selective. We roar against some regimes, but whisper against others. This is not foreign policy. I'm afraid to say that this amounts to moral cowardice. Our credibility demands consistency. We must be unrelenting with Iran, but also strong with Israel's brutality in Gaza, with Russia's barbarity in Ukraine, with every tyrant who bombs hospitals and slaughters civilians. Human rights are not negotiable, and the world's war criminals must know: Europe sees you, Europe will call you out and Europe will act. Because if we stay silent in the face of tyranny, then we are not just neutral, but we are complicit.

Mr President, Regarding approval, I have not referred to the Commission. I said that the Court, and I quote from the judgment as well, the Court said, did not say that the scheme is illegal, but rather said that countries remain within the competence to determine the conditions under which they grant or refuse, or otherwise hinder their nationality. Regarding the issue of these programmes, as I said earlier, I think we should be consistent in order to be credible. And whether or not it's a threat issue, I'm not answering it, it's not my opinion, but it's based on facts. What are the facts? What is the evidence? The proofs are that the Maltese passport opens doors in 190 countries around the world without a visa requirement. This is not a symbol of threat but a symbol of trust. And I look forward to continuing, as a Union, to work together to safeguard the interest and security of our Union.

Mr President, Kollegi, I am proud of the Maltese passport, considered by EATA to be the fifth most powerful passport in the world. Respected and trusted by 190 countries, around the world, including Canada, Japan and Australia. This is, not a symbol of threat but a symbol of trust. And I am also proud that Malta has acquired and exercised its sovereign right to decide who is its citizen, a right which it did not acquire centuries ago, but recently, a right which the European Court has neither rejected nor unlimited, but has rather clearly stated that the Member States remain in principle competent to determine are the conditions for their nationality. The Attorney General was even clearer when he said that combining citizenship with investment would not make it incompatible with the law. Therefore, in my view, this debate is not about the security of the Union and its principles. Because if it were about security, we would also have talked about the countries among us operating investment residences with much weaker scrutiny than Malta's. Therefore, I believe that all this is nothing more than a political theatre, because instead of debating the real problems of the world, such as the genocide in Gaza, we are reaching out to our country.

Mr President, Iran is killing its own people. Almost a thousand executions last year. Sentences handed down after torture and fake trials. This is state murder and we know it. We need real consequences. We cannot keep reacting with empty words. We need real pressure, clear red lines. We cannot be neutral in the face of injustice. We need to act. Silence and delays cost lives. Call this what it is: a regime that fears its own people and kills them to stay in power.

Madam President, let's put things into context. Only the last plenary, our colleagues from the right wanted to strongly condemn Thailand for deporting 40 refugees and for having repressive laws. And we rightly condemned Thailand for deporting 40 refugees. But when it comes to Gaza, where 20 000 children have been killed – the equivalent of how many children we have in Maltese schools – this House loses its voice. It's not antisemitic to call out documented war crimes in 2025. This is not World War II, but the atrocities of World War II have returned in 2025. It is not antisemitic to call for the protection of aid workers and for the access of humanitarian relief. If we cannot speak out in the face of these atrocities, then what do we even stand for in this House? And I have one piece of advice. I'm only new to this House, but let us call a spade a spade, because we have lost all our moral authority. We cannot speak on anything else if we're turning a blind eye to genocide. Indifference is complicity.

Mr President, Thailand is a country I have visited, a place of rich culture and resilience. We see Thailand as a valued partner of the European Union and today I am not here to preach, but to strengthen that partnership – one which is rooted in democracy, human rights and mutual respect. Yet, real partnerships require honesty, and we must be honest about our deep concern over the prosecution of Thai parliamentarians, opposition figures and human rights defenders under the lese-majesty law. Peaceful democratic discourse should never be a crime. Their voices should be heard, not silenced. Democracy thrives when dissent is debated, not punished. For this reason, we strongly urge the Thai authorities to grant an amnesty to those who are prosecuted or imprisoned for the peaceful exercise of their rights. We are also concerned about the deportation of Uyghur asylum seekers and the reports of mistreatment they face. By strengthening its refugee protection, Thailand has an opportunity to lead by example. Our resolution today is not about condemnation. It's about engagement. Thailand has made progress and we recognise that. But meaningful reforms, particularly to the lese-majesty law, must continue to ensure fundamental freedoms are upheld. We urge the Thai Government to take concrete steps forward towards greater democracy, political inclusivity and human rights protections. The free trade agreement negotiation is a process that can bring prosperity anchored in shared values. A thriving, open democracy strengthens Thailand's global position and reassures its partners that economic and political progress can go hand in hand. To our Thai friends, we stand ready to work with you, not against you. This is not just about an EU resolution. It is about the future of Thai democracy and the fundamental rights of its people. Let us use this moment not as a division, but as an opportunity – one to engage, to reform and to move forward together.

Mr President, European tourism needs a new vision, and today I humbly believe that we have the best opportunity. We have a Commissioner who from the very beginning has shown that he is willing to listen, to understand, but above all is willing to act and therefore to greet him. Tourism is not just a holiday and a destination. It is about work, businesses and communities that depend on it. There are major challenges that we must address together at European level: sustainability, labour shortages and the impacts of what many now call overtourism. I therefore believe that the creation of a common policy - a strategy that I would like to call a union for tourism, not a new agency, but a common policy - can be the key to finding solutions, giving back to communities. It is time to put tourism at the centre of the economic strategy of the Union as a whole and not of tourism as such. If we act concretely, we can give tourism the importance it deserves. And I am persuaded that, with the European Commissioner we have, we will get there.

Ms President, when a woman in Iran refuses to obey laws that strip her of dignity, the regime calls her dangerous or unstable. But the truth is that women are not the problem; not those who resist, but the system that punishes them if they do not bow their heads. This is not just their fight, it is our fight. It is useless to talk about human rights but we do nothing or do not do enough to defend them. We will be be betraying the values on which the European Union was founded. We have to go beyond statements. We must strengthen mechanisms to ensure accountability. We must ensure and fight for justice, and above all we must ensure that we are on the side of truth, on the side of those who courageously oppose fear and intimidation, on the side of those who after all fight only for what every human being has a right to: life, freedom and equality. Indifference is complicity. There is no room for compromise on human rights. We have a duty not only as MEPs but as human beings to stand shoulder to shoulder with the victims of this intimidation. This is a test for all of us: or we will be on the side of justice or indifference. For me, the answer is clear.

Ms President, the brutal murder of Daphne Caruana Galizia and other journalists, such as Ján Kuciak and de Vries, is reprehensible in every sense. There is no excuse for what happened. But let's be clear. This debate today is nothing more than a political exercise to cast a shadow over Malta. Since then, apart from arrests, Malta has changed the judicial system, strengthened the independence of the police, and introduced reforms that can frankly set an example for others. But of course the facts do not mean anything to those whose history has already been written. What I cannot accept is hypocrisy, because while this House does not miss an opportunity to inspect Malta, it remains silent on the 130 journalists killed in Gaza. Talk about Malta, then no, perhaps because we are young. But for the sake of fairness, let us also talk about how this Parliament has given a vote of confidence to those today accused of violence against humanity. We cannot say that we are defending the free press while remaining silent, if not discriminating against other journalists who have been killed in other countries, in Europe and beyond. This is not an issue with Malta. It is a matter of consistency. If we want to be credible, this farce must stop.

Mr President, I will not talk about the crisis, factory closures and competition from China. I prefer to talk about the mission, and the mission is to remain competitive. That is why I talk about the means, about the importance of creating a sustainable, innovative and inclusive future. In my humble view, we must look beyond reactive measures and address the root causes of the problem - the structural imbalance. The production costs of our competitors are that they are. To compete, then, we must invest in advanced technologies and manufacturing processes that lower costs without compromising social protection. Access to markets remains crucial, so we must be careful not to fall into the trap of protectionism. Instead we should promote fair and just trade by moving out of this House and looking to work towards international standards and global standards. We do not have the luxury of choice. We must adapt if we want to survive, and adapt by being flexible, being not just a regulator, but also a supporter. If we do this, I believe that we will not only save existing jobs but generate more work for future generations.

Mr President, the Energy Union has brought progress, but we cannot ignore the realities of small states such as Gozo and Malta. Insularity brings unique challenges in energy. For a small country like Malta at the end of Europe with limited access to connectivity and much lower consumption than other countries, the cost of generating each unit of energy is much higher. As Draghi said, affordable energy is crucial. If we do not want to leave even one family in a choice between poverty or cold, we cannot tolerate a one size fits all policy. To truly achieve a just transition, the European Union must respect the divergences of all its regions. Therefore, while we must continue to work for the development of clean energy, we should not restrict measures such as subsidies on electricity consumption which are essential for countries like Malta. Let us recognise that fairness also means flexibility, and a truly inclusive Energy Union must embrace these divergences and not punish them.