What Emma spoke about.

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, as long as society relies on the precarious or invisible work of women, there will be no real equality. 78% of caregivers are caregivers and the more precarious the position, the more numerous they are. These jobs are hard, sometimes despised. Even today, they are the ones that keep our societies standing. For many women, caring is also the job of: the end of the working day, free work. In the European Union, I describe the lives of more than 32 million women. 32 million women who work without any pay or recognition, 17 hours a week on average. Realize it. They reduce their working time, give up their careers, hobbies or leave the job altogether to take care of others. Caring is not a natural duty: cooking, cleaning or dressing wounds. Some people here believe that this is the nature of women. But stop trying to send us home. The submission of women is a patriarchal and ultraliberal construction. Some find their account to the right of this Chamber. On behalf of the Socialist Group, I want to make it clear: Equality is a political priority for us. It is not a case of a female nature, which does not exist, but a question of justice. "You are not born submissive, you become submissive," the philosopher could have said. But we're fighting to break those chains. We want a genuine European care strategy: massive public investment, equal pay and recognition of the work of all. What did the far right do? Under the guise of national priority and family duty, she wants to send women back to sacrifice and invisibility. Colleagues, by 2050, almost 30% of Europeans will be over 65. And by then, a quarter of the workforce will be carers. Will they be dignified workers or citizens lurking in the shadows? This is where it is decided. I hope that our future work will embody the ambitions that European women deserve.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, MeToo, #BalanceTonPorc... The word is liberated and, little by little, shame changes sides. In 2024, we adopted a major directive to combat violence against women. But due to the unfortunate positioning of some heads of state, such as Emmanuel Macron, a common definition of rape at the European level is still missing. They've since changed their minds, it's happy, but we'll have to act. Today, women are not heard. Their no is not heard. It should be remembered: yes, it is yes; No, it's no; And whoever does not say a word does not consent. We all know their names, the names of these women, our friends, our sisters, our mothers, our grandmothers who spoke or killed themselves, the names of those who no longer believe in justice because they know the numbers or imagine them. 10% of victims file complaints, 87% of complaints are dismissed. We know their stories. To define rape by the absence of consent is not to moralize desire, as we heard on the extreme right, it is to act for women. Without consent, it is neither ambiguous nor debatable; It's rape.

Mr President, Commissioner, throughout Europe the same scenario is repeated. The same strategy of the reactionaries: firstly, to denigrate public broadcasting 24 hours a day, secondly, to demand the abolition of funding, and finally, to seek to privatise. But the story does not end there. Once in power, they put public TV channels and radio to the test to make it a propaganda tool in the service of their obsessions with identity. In Lithuania, the LRT channel is threatened with a political takeover along the lines of the Hungarian and Slovak governments. In Italy, the RAI became "Télé Meloni" after being demolished by Berlusconi. In France, Bolloré’s media, Minister Rachida Dati, and far-right MP Charles Alloncle dream of putting Radio France and France Télévisions in step. No country escapes this. We cannot let them do this here in the European Parliament. Public and independent audiovisual is a pillar of our democracies. It ensures reliable information and pluralistic debate. It is an essential bulwark against foreign interference and disinformation strategies. The European Commission cannot simply send warning letters. If we want to be able to defend ourselves against the hybrid wars being waged against us, whose disinformation is a weapon of mass destruction for our democracies, we need to act, and fast. There is a need to ensure sustainable funding, but also to sanction delinquent behaviour, as provided for in the European Media Freedom Act. Attempts at concealment are unbearable. Let’s protect the public broadcaster from the reactionary international, who dreams of dictating its false narrative and its post-truth!

Madam President, Executive Vice-President, ladies and gentlemen, while Europe can only rely on itself, the Commission is finally taking stock of the threat to the security of our digital networks. I support his intention to ban Huawei from our infrastructure, whose aggressive lobbying and espionage attempts we are familiar with here. The new Network Regulation and the future Space Law will make Europe autonomous, and finally autonomous, for its satellite connection, from the rocket to the distribution of the internet network. Finally, we will pay attention to the preservation of radio as a strategic and essential infrastructure and, thus, to the place of DAB+ technology in vehicles, at a time when competition with global platforms integrated into embedded systems is raging. Without public intervention, global platforms will make their law at the expense of European technological sovereignty.

Madam President, can it be accepted today that artificial intelligence services are producing massive amounts of pedophile content of unprecedented violence? In 2025, 1,286 videos were generated by AI, including on X, thanks to Grok. Sexual and paedocriminal violence are becoming daily hobbies. Horror is encouraged, commodified. Advertising for crime has become a business like any other. And what about the hypocrisy of the extreme right about it? When Jordan Bardella and the far right asked only a few months ago for Elon Musk to receive the Sakharov Prize, which rewards human rights fighters, did he think of the children and women of Europe? When the extreme right calls itself patriotic, pretends to defend technological sovereignty and uses, like Sarah Knafo in Paris, an American AI to build its campaign site, what does it do apart from flatten itself in front of these delusions of all power? Your idols - Musk, his MAGA clique - built with Grok a weapon, a real weapon. You are submissive, totally submissive. European laws must be respected by all. We must not have the hand shaking. It's not a game, it's a fierce fight for democracy.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I hear the extreme right here say that to fight discrimination would be to fight against Europe, against European civilisation. I have even heard some talk about fighting Christmas. As if they themselves represented the European identity here; as if, even, they were the embodiment of the spirit of Christmas. It must be said: You are not Europe, you hate it. The identity of Europe is democracy. Europe’s identity is peace, it is diversity, it is universalism. You claim to be "patriots"; you are just the little puppies of the fascist international. Today, discrimination in Europe is exploding and becoming commonplace. How dare you call yourself "patriots" when you are the ones who encourage discrimination against Europeans? You think you're allowed to: You finance anti-gender movements, masculinist movements, racist movements. Our answer must be clear: Universalism, everywhere in Europe; and we have to act. The Horizontal Anti-Discrimination Directive is a concrete tool that needs to be implemented. What the far right wants, Europe – the Commission – could ultimately allow through its inaction. Then we must act: anti-racism, universalism, it’s now!

Mr President, Commissioner, Boualem Sansal has been languishing in an Algerian prison for one hundred and thirty-seven days now. One hundred and thirty-seven days. Last Thursday, he was sentenced to five years in prison by an Algerian court. His crime, in the eyes of the military regime? To have wielded his pen, acidic and impertinent, to have exercised his fundamental right to freedom of expression. It is impossible for us to remain deaf in the face of arbitrariness, censorship and the muzzling of creation. No, Boualem Sansal’s place is not in the jails of a dictatorship. I make my own the famous sentence that General de Gaulle uttered after the signing by Jean-Paul Sartre of the Manifesto of the 121, during the Algerian War: ‘Voltaire shall not be imprisoned.’ Like many of my colleagues in Parliament, I am not fooled either. On the far right of this Chamber, you have nothing to do with the situation of Boualem Sansal. You are cynically exploiting freedom of expression to serve your racist and xenophobic agenda. When you're in power, you muzzle writers. In Meloni’s Italy, Roberto Saviano is intimidated, sentenced and silenced. In Viktor Orbán's Hungary, writers are censored in the name of protecting minors. So, ladies and gentlemen, let us demand without detour or compromise the immediate release of Boualem Sansal! As authoritarians progress, words or books are now banned in a world that was hoped to be free, the left and republicans must always be on the side of artists, of their freedom of creation, of freedom of expression. No voice should be missing, otherwise the left despairs and dishonors itself. Boualem Sansal needs sincere and frank support. Silence is impossible. Our action is a total requirement.

Madam President, everywhere the reactionary shadow is spreading, and with it the backsliding of many rights for women. Europe must wake up and our awakening must be feminist. The Commission had a major opportunity to stand up to the reactionaries and reaffirm its commitment to equality. This roadmap includes important steps that the Socialists, together with Mrs Mînzatu, have taken away from the Commission: fight against gender-based and sexual violence, equal pay, political participation, fight against sexism in the media... Yet, once again, the European Commission is disappointing. Ursula von der Leyen gave in to the Conservatives. It gives us a communication operation worthy of the CSR policy of a large private group, where gender equality is defended solely through the prism of economic benefits. I therefore welcome this text with lucidity. This is a first step, but it is insufficient. We cannot be satisfied with declarations of intent. We need clear commitments, commensurate with the stakes. At a time when Putin, but also all the imperialists and religious fundamentalists we are fighting, are not only attacking our European borders, but are waging a war against women, we must assume a European feminist diplomacy and oppose them with our ambitious, universalist and combative European feminist model.

Madam President, seven years ago, on 21 February 2018, Ján Kuciak and Martina Kušnírová were coldly murdered. A double gunshot murder at their home. Their crime? Doing their job as a journalist: Investigate, inform. Seven years later, not only has justice not been fully served, but even worse, Robert Fico, who had to resign under the pressure of the scandal, is back in power. A slap in the face for democracy, a chilling message for press freedom. This commemoration should not be a mere reminder of the facts, it should be an electroshock. The European Union can no longer remain a spectator in the face of rising threats against journalists: intimidation, surveillance, physical and psychological violence, judicial and economic harassment. Every day, the freedom of the press recedes a little more. The European Union must act firmly to strengthen the safety of journalists and ensure a free and independent media environment. This fight is not only that of journalists, it is that of every European citizen who refuses to live in a society muzzled by fear and corruption, citizens who want a democracy of struggle and not illiberal democracies, plagued by media concentration.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, I know that we are looking with great demand at the immense women who have left their mark on this institution, such as Gisèle Halimi and Simone Veil, women who would not let us regress and fall into the vile traps set for us by the extreme right in this Chamber. We will not fall into any of your traps because we know who you are. You claim to be the allies of women in the face of violence, injunctions, commodifications. You claim to be the allies of women in their quest for emancipation, but we are not fooled! We know who you truly are as allies. You are the allies of billionaires building media empires to fight equality. You are the allies of religious fundamentalists who want to control our bodies, and we will not fall into your traps. We will continue to work patiently, courageously for equality, despite your attempts to pollute our feminist struggles with transphobia and racism. As the trial of Gisèle Pelicot’s rapists ends today and shame has changed sides, we have a duty to act without ever trembling. Our diplomacy, our budget, our future projects: all this must be under the sign of feminism, and that is the meaning of the text we need to adopt today.

Mr President, in 2006, in a letter to his Algerian compatriots, Boualem Sansal already denounced the violence of censors: You have no right to think that. You're not an Algerian, you don't deserve to exist. In another life, they must have been the Holy Inquisition. This same violence of censors, he is today the victim. It is now seven days, seven days that the Franco-Algerian writer is detained after his arrest by the Algerian authorities. But what crime motivated this arrest? What crimes justify his detention? Nothing more than his creative freedom, his impertinence, his acid, ferocious, scathing feather. We cannot remain deaf in the face of arbitrariness. No, Boualem Sansal's place is not in the jails of a dictatorship. It is the honor of France and Europe to have been built in opposition to letters of stamp and embalming. The French and European spirit, it is the Enlightenment and freedom of expression, it is Voltaire who attacks the absolute monarchy, it is Alexander Solzhenitsyn who denounces the Gulag archipelago in his book published in Paris, it is Charlie Hebdo who carries the caricature in the wound. The European Union must affirm with one voice the arbitrary and intolerable nature of such an arrest. We MEPs must demand the immediate release of Boualem Sansal.

Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, 'abortion is the leading cause of death in the world'. This is the lie that CNews broadcast on February 25, 2024. A false information, one more, which is part of a real cultural battle, orchestrated by the media empire of Vincent Bolloré in France, at the service of the extreme right. Offensives that can be found elsewhere in Europe, in Hungary with Orban, in the Czech Republic with Babiš. Will we accept these Trumpist methods that smear the democratic debate? We assume that fighting against the concentration of the media, for the plurality of expressions, for a strong public service of the audiovisual sector, for the independence of journalists, is fighting for our democracies. This year, ambitious texts have been adopted within the European Union. But it is now necessary to act and ensure the implementation of these texts. We are at a crossroads: Will Europe be powerful or servile? Does the Commission intend to go further? Does it intend to impose full shareholder transparency and a unified European database, and really punish disinformation? Let's protect Europe and democracy, let's act!