| Rank | Name | Country | Group | Speeches | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Lukas Sieper | Germany DEU | Non-attached Members (NI) | 390 |
| 2 |
|
Juan Fernando López Aguilar | Spain ESP | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 354 |
| 3 |
|
Sebastian Tynkkynen | Finland FIN | European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) | 331 |
| 4 |
|
João Oliveira | Portugal PRT | The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) | 232 |
| 5 |
|
Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis | Lithuania LTU | Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) | 227 |
All Contributions (62)
Misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms, such as TikTok, and related risks to the integrity of elections in Europe (debate)
Madam President, this is an absolutely wonderful example of a man who is truly brainwashed and does not perceive reality from his own dreams. I don't know what you know about my political background, as you say, but information from the mainstream media that people like me don't have a chance to get into doesn't have a chance to respond to them, but they like to write about them, give them stickers. That information is real misinformation. I have never in my life defended a person who would publicly call for violence, murder, genocide, or anything like that. This, of course, must not be protected by freedom of expression. But this is probably not an example of a Romanian candidate who won the election, and here colleagues do not like it.
Misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms, such as TikTok, and related risks to the integrity of elections in Europe (debate)
Madam President, the European Commission and these progressive Members are in fact a threat to democracy in the European Union, in individual Member States. This is not a rumor of Russian influence. It is you who are calling in this plenary for us to censor TikTok, for us to censor X. It is you who are talking about blackmailing Elon Musk, threatening social platforms if the candidates you wish to win do not win. As long as progressives win, as long as liberals win, as long as social networks censor people just like me. Who may have tens of thousands of people on Facebook, for example, but before the election they will just shut it down for no reason and will not allow you to defend yourself. That's when everything is fine, that's when you protect democracy. But when a candidate who does not have opinions like you wins in Romania, then there is Russian interference, for which no one here has given one piece of evidence for the whole debate. At the same time, democracy is under threat. Even a young child can see how hypocritical you are. That the European Union, under your leadership, is turning into a totalitarian undemocratic monster. And just as every undemocratic totalitarian regime in the past has fallen because of the anger and freedom of the people, so will yours.
Misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms, such as TikTok, and related risks to the integrity of elections in Europe (debate)
Why didn't you sound the alarm when social media shut down President Donald Trump's account? Why didn't you sound the alarm? I think your party in the Czech Republic even applauded when governments in the Czech Republic and Slovakia shut down alternative media without any rational justification. Why haven't you rebelled by shutting down patriotic politicians like myself and many others in the Czech Republic before elections with accounts that had tens of thousands of followers? And it wasn't a problem for you until now, when your progressive candidates stop winning, now you're sounding the alarm. Doesn't that seem hypocritical to you?
Outcome of COP 29 and challenges for international climate policy (debate)
No text available
Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia (debate)
No text available
Abuse of new technologies to manipulate and radicalise young people through hate speech and antidemocratic discourse (debate)
Mr President, Commissioner, Mao Zedong and Comrade Stalin would also be proud of what you have said here in your speech. After all, it is awful how totalitarian the European Union is now going to under your leadership! Do you know who the real extremists are? Those who have ordered people here to live under a meaningless green deal that destroys their standard of living, thanks to which normal young people can not even buy a new house in which to start their families. Extremists are those fools who stick to pavements and asphalt to prevent people from coming home normally with cars. Extremists are those who bring millions of illegal immigrants into Europe and help them to cross the borders of our states in violation of the law. These are real extremists, not patriots, not patriots, not those who love their states. Those who love their countries, who want to protect their children and their families from the dangers currently threatening them. We want to keep the world and Europe free, which is why we need to get rid of people like you in the leadership of the European Commission. We need a return to common sense, and when it means radicalism to you, I am proud to say so, because freedom is what the European Union needs at the moment.
Closing the EU skills gap: supporting people in the digital and green transitions to ensure inclusive growth and competitiveness in line with the Draghi report (debate)
Madam President, we are slowly talking about the same thing here every day. The European Union is lagging behind, our states are plunging into poverty, young people are unable to get normal affordable housing because property prices are extremely high. But what you have, colleagues, the biggest problem is to name the culprit of this condition. It is you who are the culprit who are voting for most of these nonsensical European policies. The culprit is the people who supported this plenary greend deal, which limits people's lives at the most basic basal level. You are introducing emission permits for households, you are making fuel more expensive, you are causing with your economic sanctions that life in Europe is simply falling to ever-worse and worse attributes. Then you wonder if China, America, Russia are escaping the European Union? You simply need to put an end to these nonsensical plans and let people live normally freely to thrive and develop as has been the case in Europe for ages, when Europe was precisely the bearer of innovation in the world. This plenary, the European Commission and the European Council are the key reasons why we are failing in this way today.
Outcome of the Summit of the Future: transforming global governance for building peace, promoting human rights and achieving the sustainable development goals (debate)
Madam President, the world's digital totalitarianism, the economic slavery of the entire planet, are in fact the aims of your globalist pacts. That's what the migration pact was all about. That is what this future pact is about. This is what all the proposals from the World Health Organization are about. We are not stupid enough not to see you at the World Economic Forum, as Klaus Schwab and I grumble about the fact that people should not own anything, but be happy. Your goal is to enslave people, deprive them of their freedom and introduce absolute totalitarianism. You are not really hiding it. You're just giving it beautiful names. You talk about it in flashy titles like saving the planet. Few of you are naive and stupid enough to believe that if we ban cars with combustion engines in Europe, we will save the planet. The real goal is to deprive people of the possibility of owning a normal means of transport. The real goal is to plunge them into poverty, because enslaved, obedient, dependent people who are in poverty are far better governed than people who are free, who have their rights and who can value their dignity. We've seen it during the Covid era, we're seeing it now. You don't want to give up your globalist plans, but we will always fight them.
The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia (debate)
Madam President, you should actually be ashamed. Every week, you choose a state that you want to dictate, how local people should decide, what kind of government they should have, how they should approach the upbringing of their children, what laws these states should recognize. And what you accuse Georgia of has simply gone beyond all borders. Are you so upset that Georgia protects its children from pedophiles, that it protects the traditional family, that it has decided to protect children in their upbringing from the dangerous rainbow gender ideology and your fictional eighty sexes? I openly congratulate Georgia on this law because it protects a normal family. Are you seriously accusing Georgia of adopting a law that defines foreign agents? The same law that the United States of America has, the same law that your beloved Israel has? I, on the other hand, congratulate Georgia on protecting itself from the millions of Soros who are trying to introduce the propaganda that I have just talked about. Give peace to the Democrats! Don't impose your views on them, and don't call it democracy at all.
EU response to the Mpox outbreak and the need for continuous action (debate)
Mr President, really give peace to the people of Europe! We do not need a common European solution at all. We don't need more fear. We do not need any threats of the common pandemic that you are talking about here, and we need to make monkeypox a threat to our public health. We really do remember how you behaved during those two years of the corona. How you treat people! What nonsense has come from this House! What business was done here with vaccines through Ursula von der Leyen and those legendary memes! And we know very well. We remember very well how many people you've ruined! How many entrepreneurs have you brought to your knees? How many people have you created with your lockdowns? How many negative effects did your vaccinations have, which you enforced violently and restricted people's normal, democratic, free human rights! We do not need to call for any common European solution here. We do not need to call for the European Commission, or perhaps this plenary, to be given additional powers to interfere with the rights of sovereign nation states. What the citizens of individual Member States need is no more competence for Brussels. There is no more competence for the Commission, but more freedom and less of the European Union!
The Hungarian “National Card” scheme and its consequences for Schengen and the area of freedom, security and justice (debate)
Colleagues, I still can't believe what we're talking about. Ten Russians, four Belarusians, who received a work visa in Hungary. Those who have to work there, who have to create value there, who have to pay taxes there. Is that why you want Hungary to be punished? To enter into his sovereign decision, not to respect the democratic will of Hungarian citizens, even to introduce border controls in Hungary or to withdraw his voting rights at the European Council. Is this even conceivable? And we are told this by the same MEPs who, here in plenary, are voting shamelessly to turn illegal immigration into so-called irregular immigration. This means legalising illegal immigrants who, when they come to Europe's gates, use violence to get here, throw their papers away. We don't know anything about them. We do not know whether they will commit violence, rape women, commit terrorist attacks in Europe. But many of these MEPs, who are calling for Hungary to be punished for allowing these visas, openly say that these immigrants do not pose a threat. Just clean it up in your head! Because this is just an attempt to punish Hungary for not respecting your own totalitarian practices.
The Hungarian “National Card” scheme and its consequences for Schengen and the area of freedom, security and justice (debate)
Do you really listen to yourself? So you're criticizing Hungary for not paying the $200 million fine that was imposed on it just for protecting its borders from illegal immigrants? And at the same time, do you put Russian workers who come to Hungary on normal work permits, of which we all know, on the same level as illegal immigrants who crossed the Hungarian border using violence, who raided people there, shot at border guards? What do you really want from Hungary? Say it straight. To pay the fine? To open the border wide? Did they send all of Africa to Europe? And then you'll be satisfied? And they also banned Russian workers from entering the territory of the European Union? What is your final solution?