Speeches

Mr. President, please. The intertwining of political and economic interests, when the European institutions talk about themselves, is called lobbying, not corruption. Only the Member States are accused of corruption. The aim has always been to further enhance EU competences and exert political and economic pressure. The EU institutions are blocking the possibility of external auditing from the Member States, so that this does not inadvertently threaten their competences and objectives. Therefore, the creation of a new independent ethics body can be supported under two conditions. Ha maradéktalanul tiszteletben tartják a Szerződéseinket, a közös Szerződéseinket, és megfelelő hatáskört biztosítanak a tagállamok számára.

Mr. President, please. While the left-wing majority in the European Parliament regards the organisation of illegal migration and its financial and legal support as a human rights issue, Hungary regards it as a matter of national security and treats it accordingly, and I promise you that it will treat it accordingly. Illegal migration is not humanitarian aid. The worst thing they can do. The European Union should take note of the fact that illegal migration is dangerous and should not be legalised or organised, but should be stopped because of its obvious security risks. In contrast, real humanitarian aid is a foreign policy priority for Hungary. Its international development cooperation policy is an important tool in this area, with the help of which we can address the causes of migration on the ground and create the economic background that forces these people to stay on the ground. After Africa has been drained, we should focus on your help. We will continue to fight illegal migration. We would like to thank Minister Salvini for his work and the Meloni government for its action.

Madam President, I'm sorry. Today's debate is yet another example of the regrettable phenomenon that only far-right atrocities reach the threshold of the European Parliament. You are also setting double standards in the fight against violence. And they believe that legality is a leftist prerogative. I would like to remind you that in 2006, the second year of our EU membership, this Parliament did not even consider putting on the agenda the actions of the extreme leftist, post-communist Gyurcsány government against peaceful demonstrators. We had something to argue about. Suffice it to say that the left always has only the middle, and the right always has only the edge. Common European action is needed wherever a group expresses its political opinions by force, regardless of party affiliation. In view of the ever-increasing corruption scandal, this House should now be able to conduct a self-examination.

Mr. President, please. The united Hungarian left was financed by non-European interest groups in the Hungarian election campaign in the amount of USD 3 billion. Meanwhile, here in Parliament, politicians of the European left have also received money from outside Europe, based on suspicions raised in criminal proceedings, so that their political position serves an interest outside the EU. While the members of the European left are showing their utmost commitment to defending the rule of law and working people, fighting corruption, and accusing Hungary of their lies on a daily basis, it seems that in reality their position can be bought. All this shows that the left is trying to mislead the electorate, and it is time for them to look inside themselves and conduct a moral and political self-examination.

Dear Mr President, The judgment of the European Court of Justice confirmed that the main achievement of the European Union is the creation of an area without internal frontiers in which persons can move freely. The reintroduction of border control at internal borders should remain an exceptional and proportionate measure, which should only take place as a last resort. If we want the Union to remain important to our citizens, it is essential to preserve Schengen. We have been saying for years: in order to have peace and security within the Schengen internal borders, our external borders must be protected. Hungary has been effectively guaranteeing the protection of the EU's external borders for a long time with considerable human and material costs. We are doing this in solidarity with the European Union as a whole. However, we don't get support, we just get criticism for it. This year is also an extraordinary year in terms of border protection. It is the strongest year since 2015 for illegal immigration. The European Union must recognise that in times of crisis it is necessary to defend ourselves outwards and to stand together inwards.

Dear Mr President, Because of its high-quality products and services, the European Union is a popular trading partner in global markets. However, the response to the effects of the energy crisis, war inflation and the general economic downturn, as well as to changes in the international environment, should ensure first and foremost the competitiveness of the Union and not ideological ideas that are outside the scope of trade policy. Hungary is committed to the importance of sustainability goals, environmental protection and human rights. At the same time, it should be noted that international trade policy is neither intended nor suitable to address other policy objectives. The expansion of Hungarian and European companies active in foreign markets should be facilitated by all possible means. Open and rule-based trade is in the interest of Hungary and the European Union.

– Honourable Member, I would like to ask you: If we are already talking about democracy, what do you think about the statement by Federal Foreign Minister Baerbock that she is not interested in the opinion of the German voters in principle? When we talk about democracy, I would ask you this question. And in Hungary, too, voters this year opted for a democratically elected conservative, Christian-democratic government. Please, Mr. Speaker, respect that.

Madam President, please. The proposal on the functioning and finances of European parties and party foundations poses a fundamental threat to European democracy and violates the fundamental conditions of the rule of law. The strongest democratic legitimacy component of the European Union is still free elections in the Member States, with the participation of national parties and following the majority principle. Excessive bureaucracy in the EU and interference in the electoral systems of the EU Member States, with the European Parliament subordinating to a committee outsourced from its own administration, whether national parties, which are the pillars of democracy, can exist and operate in the Member States. On this basis, the European Parliament could even remove parties it does not like from political life. In this form, we cannot support the proposal.

Mr President! Since Mrs Barley and the Socialists have not asked themselves the questions, I would like to leave something in the room here. In Germany, politicians decide directly on the federal level who is appointed as a judge. The decision is made by the Judicial Election Committee, which can be composed exclusively of politicians. 16 members are the state ministers, another 16 members are appointed by the Bundestag. Should it not be considered a double standard that the independence and politicisation of the German courts are never called into question, but that you repeatedly express concerns about the independence of Hungarian and Polish courts?

Dear Commissioner, Sehr geehrte Frau Vorsitzende! Dear fellow Members, The European Union and Africa have an important and long-standing political, economic and cultural relationship. The need for an economic approach that treats Africa not only as a recipient of aid and humanitarian aid but also as an economic partner of the EU is beyond dispute. However, it is equally important for the European Union to support Africa in improving living conditions so that people do not want to leave their continent en masse. One of the most negative effects of the measures taken so far is that migration flows to Europe have steadily increased in recent years. It is time for change, for the European Union to focus on creating the conditions for remaining local. We need to ensure that African people can stay in their home countries in dignified conditions and become markets for European products, services and the knowledge economy for their own development and mutual benefit.

Dear Mr President, The Treaty on European Union refers the issue of national security to the Member States in a clear and unambiguous manner. The setting up of the Pegasus Committee and the European Parliament's scrutiny in this area, which is subordinated to political objectives, are illegal. It is a serious violation of the sovereignty of the Member States. Hungary, on the other hand, operates as a democratic state governed by the rule of law and, as such, has always acted and continues to act in accordance with the legislation in force in matters of national security. According to the findings of the governmental and non-governmental institutions controlling the national security services, the legality of the operation of these bodies is fully substantiated. Since the entry into office of the civilian government twelve years ago, the Hungarian national security services have not carried out and continue to carry out illegal surveillance. During the time of the left-wing governments, however, there were a number of serious illegalities. We call on the European Parliament to respect our treaties.

Madam President, the report of the AIDA Special Committee set out the direction of the EU’s approach to artificial intelligence. On an unparalleled scale, Europe can establish its own leadership in the area of AI by creating a regulatory environment that gives both private and business users the most appropriate and complete rights and the widest possible protection. This report can be – and confidentially will be – used as a compass during the AI-related process ahead. Faced with the rapid technological development of AI and a global policy context where more and more countries are investing heavily in AI, the EU must act to harness the many opportunities and address the challenges of AI in a future-proof manner. We have to set the appropriate standards – neither more nor less than is necessary to achieve our goals. We can pave the way to ethical technology worldwide and ensure that the EU remains competitive all along the way. On artificial intelligence, trust is not an option but a must. That is what human-centred artificial intelligence is all about. The primary purpose of the development and the use of algorithms, sensors and robots is not to produce technology or create scientific knowledge, but to support the quality of human life, the preservation of health and the organisation of social relations. AI should be used at the service of people, families and businesses, and not the other way around. I would like to thank Mr Axel Voss for his excellent work and congratulate him on this very good report.

Dear Madam President, Today I am asking you for a self-reflection, so I will start with a quote. "Russia has given hope and strength to all minorities in the fight for their rights. The referendum in Crimea highlighted the dichotomy between the United States and the European Union, because they only support peoples’ self-determination and human and minority rights if their geopolitical interests so require.’ These statements were made by the Hungarian far-right a few years ago, when their members took part as election observers in the referendum on the annexation of Crimea to Russia and celebrated the Russian annexation of the peninsula. The alliance of far-right Jobbik with the Hungarian left was enthusiastically supported by the European left-wing parties, Donald Tusk stepped on the same stage as his candidate for prime minister and, under his patronage, joined the European People's Party in the Hungarian election campaign. Ladies and gentlemen! When discussing the relationship between the Kremlin and the far-right parties, the European party families should first of all look within themselves and exercise self-examination, you on the left. Whose interests are they actually defending in such political positions?

Madam President, first of all I want to thank Frau Niebler. The Data Governance Act claims to help exploit the potential of the data economy by facilitating the availability to have large amounts of data for emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence. The proposal is the first concrete step towards promoting the technological sovereignty of the EU by creating the legal framework for the voluntary sharing of data. The launch of the domestic data economy and the development of the digital ecosystem, including the data economy ecosystem are a matter of greatest importance. The Hungarian government seeks to encourage the disposition and activation of private data assets through the transfer of international good practices and the awareness of the interests of the stakeholders, which results in increased international competitiveness of the Hungarian and European data economic system. I would like to thank you for the great efforts of the rapporteur for achieving a reasonable and balanced text which serves the interests of an efficient data asset management both in Europe and Hungary.

Mr President, Commissioner, I support the Republic of Moldova to benefit from this macro-financial assistance operation. Moldova, the most fragile neighbour of Ukraine, apart from the humanitarian emergency, is also noting a massive economic hit from the loss of its imports from Ukraine, a collapse in investor confidence and cross-border activity. This MFA operation would help Moldova to cover part of its external financial needs and contribute to reducing fiscal vulnerabilities. In these times of multiple crises, the European Union plays a key role in ensuring economic resilience within the EU as well. The European Commission should therefore refrain from subordinating financial stability to political interests. To this end, Hungary asked for immediate and effective access to EU funds allocated to it. Amid war and consequently growing economic insecurity, it would be of utmost importance for the Commission to act on a professional basis.

Mr. President, please. With the new EU NGO law, the left-wing majority in the European Parliament wants to take away the powers of the Member States and eliminate all meaningful control, control and even meaningful information for society over civil society organisations. With this federalist effort, they want to institutionalize the principle that it is forbidden to exercise any control over the non-profit sector, that NGOs are above the law. In our view, participatory democracy and constitutional order are about the transparency and familiarity of the operation of the participants of public life. Civil society organisations account for their finances and activities accordingly. Fidesz and the Hungarian government stand up for the Europe of nation states, for national sovereignty and for the defence of constitutional order. We do not give in to this leftist political pressure. No one can be above the law. My country is a state governed by the rule of law, and part of that is that everyone has to abide by the laws, even civil society organisations. We do not support this report.

Mr. President, please. The European Union and its Member States together account for 36% of global humanitarian aid. This leadership should be maintained and made even more effective in the future so that aid can actually reach those in need. Humanitarian emergencies are linked to migration, as the increased frequency and intensity of climate-related disasters fuel conflicts and force an increasing number of people to leave their homes in the long term. However, the rapporteur rightly did not make the mistake of urging the creation of corridors for migrants. Thus, the report focuses on real problems and real needs. Our firm and consistent principle is that help should be taken where there is trouble. The results confirm this approach. Through our humanitarian support through the Hungary Helps programme, we have enabled half a million people to remain in their homeland or to return to their homes.

Mr. President, please. Domestic violence is not a private matter. As a Christian, I consider it intolerable and condemn any form of domestic violence. The regulatory provisions on parental responsibility should be based on the best interests of the child, excluding the possibility of the child being the victim of any abuse within the family. However, this report is ideologically driven and violates national sovereignty. Once again, we are faced with a stealth enlargement of the powers of the EU institutions. Each Member State has the right to establish its own rules on the protection of victims of intimate partner violence. The Hungarian government stands by the victims of domestic violence. It has been continuously developing its prevention and victim support system for ten years. The Istanbul Convention is not a panacea, in many cases it sets weaker rules than the existing legal instruments in Hungary and the Member States.