18
Jan
2023
Watch
Criminalisation of humanitarian assistance, including search and rescue (debate)
Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, let us start with the title of this debate on the criminalisation of rescue at sea. Do you think that laying down rules means criminalizing? Let me give you an example: On board ambulances there are doctors and volunteers who save millions of lives every day, yet, rightly, they are subjected to rules, protocols, procedures. No one would ever dream of saying that we must remove any kind of rule, because the rules save lives and help everyone to manage our coexistence in a more orderly way. Why should NGOs at sea be an exception? That the presence of NGOs at sea is a factor of attraction is scientifically proven. Lately there has been a joint study by scholars from the University of Turin, Cagliari and Houston that confirms this. Migrants, if they are comforted by the presence of NGOs at sea, leave with less safe means and precarious boats, thus increasing the possibility of shipwreck. The duty of a good minister and a good ruler is to protect the security of a country. Matteo Salvini is on trial for having defended the borders of Italy and therefore of Europe, for having rendered a service to Europe. At trial, however, there should go all those NGOs that agree with the smugglers to land irregular immigrants on our coasts. To have private bodies such as NGOs manage immigration is to sign off on the failure of European policies. Politics goes back to politics, to defending borders and its citizens. Otherwise, those citizens who think that this Europe is useless or, at worst, harmful to our security are right. (The speaker agreed to answer a blue card)