What Ivan spoke about.

20

May

2026

Speeches CS

Watch

Reviewing the ETS system to support European competitiveness (topical debate)

Madam President, declining competitiveness is, in the long term, the main problem of the European Union, which is threatened by a deep decline that has already begun. It has a long range of causes. Most of them belong to the cluster of conditions for business. In addition to the declining number of skilled workers in the necessary structure, overregulation and burden of administrative burdens, these are additional complications on the own initiative of the institutions of the European Union. The worst is the project. Green Deal, which does not help nature, but destroys farming. One of the most significant burdens is the ETS, in particular the free trade of allowances. It is a criminal idea, it must be abandoned or fundamentally mitigated while there is still time. Draghi's report identifies a number of problems, but if he insists on achieving the goals Green DealOh, she's ridiculous. Any effort to remove obstacles to competitiveness, including the Conservative Group initiative, should be welcomed.

19

May

2026

Speeches CS

Watch

Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate)

Madam President, I understand the concern about the availability of fertilisers, which is essential for food security. Livestock fertilisers are available in insufficient quantities under pressure to reduce cattle farming. The production of artificial fertilizers depends on the price of energy, and this has been increased by anti-Russian sanctions and imports of expensive liquefied gas. This has led to the uncompetitiveness of EU producers. This has been ‘addressed’ by the European Commission by customs duties on imports of artificial fertilisers from Russia and Belarus, which have increased fertiliser prices for farmers, which feed into food prices. Following the attack on Iran by a key ally of the European Union, the Strait of Hormuz was logically blocked, leading to import restrictions and further price increases. Commission proposes to reduce the consumption of man-made fertilisers under Green Deal I'm sure he's happy. The starting point is the lifting of anti-Russian sanctions and the withdrawal from Iran. Or explain to citizens why you have made their food more expensive.

19

May

2026

Speeches CS

Watch

EU governance under pressure – institutional responses to global challenges (debate)

Mr President, the question has been asked: What can the EU administration do under the pressure of global challenges? How is he supposed to react? It's a sign of helplessness. If we go to the root of the problem, it is clear that in the governance structure, unless this structure changes – and it cannot change because it is encoded in the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – we cannot expect an appropriate response to global challenges. At the centre of power is the European Commission, a corps of unelected officials headed by a second term president who has already chosen as a flagship project at the start of her term of office. Green Deal, which is causing serious damage to the economy and thus to the social situation of citizens in the European Union. Other key projects are the promotion of immigration, control over citizens, corruption through subsidies that lead to the growth of bureaucracy. This is followed by a self-destructive foreign policy and support for the war in Ukraine and militarization aimed at creating a war conflict. Let's get back to reality!

11

Mar

2026

Speeches CS

Watch

Child sexual abuse online: protect children, not perpetrators (topical debate)

10

Mar

2026

Speeches CS

Watch

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate)

Madam President, the housing crisis, including the rise of homelessness, has a number of causes and points to the failure of European Union policy. Housing makes European Union priorities such as ETS2, emission allowances, the boomerang of anti-Russian sanctions, high administrative burdens, etc. The so-called European Affordable Housing Plan will not solve the problem. It defines objectives while the means to achieve them are questionable, e.g. new technical solutions, new building materials or the popular mantra of reducing administrative burden. The review of state aid is, as is clear, not as important as arms. Poverty theorists in the European Union may adopt another concept. In addition to energy poverty, transport poverty, menstrual poverty can define housing poverty. Social problems cannot be solved in conditions of antisocial practice.

11

Feb

2026

Speeches CS

Watch

Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate)

Madam President, lagging behind the countries of the European Union is an open secret. It's nice that someone tries to analyze the problem, but if they overlook the elephant in the room, it's a futile effort. The one thing that makes the most sense is Green Deal with all its consequences. It is understood as an inviolable dogma. Green Deal He's not the only one. Another problem is the focus on unproductive activities, including the current militarization and focus on developing a conflict with Russia that has become a prospective partner for the exchange of goods, especially raw materials, and a significant outlet for sanctions and a dubious goal in an attempt to achieve its isolation and even military defeat. Another major problem is the lack of education and the predominant consumer lifestyle with the extinction of the population and its replacement by immigrants from underdeveloped countries.

19

Jan

2026

Speeches CS

Watch

Framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest (debate)

Madam President, the fundamental question is whether healthcare should serve citizens or corporations that abuse the information supremacy of the sick, exploit their fear, ignorance and monopoly position. Current practice shows that the interests of citizens are not at stake. The instrument of change must be a pricing policy that must not be in the hands of monopolies. The state must clearly dictate the affordability and local availability of a sufficiently wide range of medicines. The state must ensure the local production of effective generics and must prevent the artificial prolongation of patent protection and the promotion of drugs that are just a commercial ploy. Generic prescriptions must be enforced, with the obligation to prioritise the cheapest effective safe drugs. It is necessary to control the distribution of drugs. Medicines for rare diseases and so-called. orphan drugs they must have public support to ensure their availability. The present proposal does not adequately address the problem. If you serve corporations, you don't want to make any changes.

17

Dec

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)

Russia is clearly an aggressor. It is questionable how long it took for the aggression to be provoked by the attacks on the Russian population in eastern Ukraine. This is absolutely unequivocal. So if you don't understand this, I don't know what else to talk about. You are preparing for war, and I am afraid you will succeed, and Eastern Europe will be the battlefield. In principle, we want to avoid this.

17

Dec

2025

Answers CS

Watch

Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)

I'm almost embarrassed to answer such a naive question. It is necessary to ask the question: How would Russia benefit from the continuation of the war? Would he want more territory if he had such a huge territory? Other resources when it's so rich in resources? Or would it want to achieve self-destruction by another war confrontation? These are just completely nonsensical ideas. So, on the contrary, I am afraid that if you continue to prepare for the war as before, you will only achieve that the war will continue to Central and Western Europe. And that's probably what you want to achieve.

17

Dec

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)

Madam President, since the Maidan coup and the establishment of the current regime, most EU institutions and governments have supported Ukraine's self-destruction. From the beginning, it was clear that Ukraine, even with the massive support of the US and the governments of the countries of the European Union, could not militarily defeat Russia. It turned out that Russia failed to break up with war spending and 20 packages of sanctions, as was the intention from the beginning. The result of the so-called support of Ukraine is the continuation of the war and the death of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian men. Ukraine has long been able to reach a peace agreement under much better conditions than today. She wasn't allowed to. If the war in Ukraine continues, Ukraine will lose more territory. It is clear that the leaders of many EU countries want the war to continue. Rejecting realistic solutions will only further prolong the suffering of the people of Ukraine.

16

Dec

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

EU Defence Readiness (joint debate)

16

Dec

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products (A10-0254/2025 - Gabriel Mato) (vote)

21

Oct

2025

Answers CS

Watch

Stepping up funding for Ukraine’s reconstruction and defence: the use of Russian frozen assets (debate)

My dear colleague, part of the agreement was also that Ukraine would be a neutral country. This was clearly violated. I do not agree that the response to such violations should be military intervention. But on the other hand, it is necessary to ask what possibilities exist for accepting the situation so that a settlement can be reached. Nothing like that happened. All the support of European Union officials on the Maidan was there to provoke a war with Russia.

21

Oct

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

Stepping up funding for Ukraine’s reconstruction and defence: the use of Russian frozen assets (debate)

Madam President, Ukraine was supposed to be a neutral country under an international agreement, its neutrality was respected by Russia. After the color coup on Maidan, the new government rejected neutrality, and NATO sought to adopt it, and NATO military facilities in Ukraine began to be built. After the Russian intervention, the Minsk agreements and the Istanbul agreements were ignored. Ukraine is robbed and broken, completely dependent on foreign financial aid, more than a million Ukrainian soldiers have fallen, millions of people have fled from poverty. Ukraine is militarily in an impasse. The title of this debate shows that it is not a realistic diplomatic solution to the conflict that is envisaged, but the continuation of the war. The freezing of the assets of a foreign country and even their use will lead to a definitive loss of credibility of financial operations in the European Union. I recommend turning to realistic politics.

9

Sep

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

Ukraine (joint debate)

Madam President, security is indivisible. The condition of peace is the provision of security guarantees for all. A party to the conflict whose security guarantees will not be assured will necessarily feel threatened and act accordingly. Such a situation is a guarantee of the continuation of the conflict. I'm afraid that's exactly the point. Peace, which only one side recognizes as just, is not peace. Such peace will not be accepted unless it is peace after surrender, which must be accepted by the defeated party. I don't know anyone in their right mind who thinks Russia is close to surrender. If politics is the art of the possible, then what the European Union is doing is not politics. Under the conditions advocated by the European Union, peace cannot be achieved and human losses and material damage will continue to escalate with the risk of a third world war.

21

May

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

Improving mental health at work (debate)

Mr President, I am a psychiatrist, I worked in a research institute, where there was also a department of industrial psychiatry. It doesn't exist anymore. Other is the issue in industrial enterprises, other in administration. Today, the reduced mental resilience of younger generations plays an important role. Much depends on the personality structure of the workers. The most important risk factors are stress at risk work or work in time stress, conflicts between workers and, for stereotypical or frustrating work, loss of motivation and burnout syndrome. Some professions are characterised by high levels of suicide, such as soldiers, police officers, doctors – especially in certain fields – farmers, artists. The solution must be first of all prevention, i.e. technical and organizational adjustments of the workplace, adjustments to the organization of work and mediation of conflict in the workplace, and only then, if a mental disorder, diagnosis and therapy by professionals appear.

8

May

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

80 years after the end of World War II - freedom, democracy and security as the heritage of Europe (debate)

Mr President, I read online that, under the pressure of the Soviet occupation of Germany in April 1945, a prominent Austrian painter committed suicide. This is a funny exaggeration, as history is being rewritten in the European Union today. It's worse than it was in socialist countries 40 years ago. At that time, the liberation of 10% of the territory of Czechoslovakia by the U.S. Army with 300 casualties was downplayed. Today, the liberation of the remaining 90% of the territory by the Soviet army with 144,000 fallen is even referred to as occupation. This year's commemorative assembly in Auschwitz was attended by representatives from the country of the victims and the founders, Israel and Germany, but not by Russians as the main nationalities of the liberators. Crimes are relativized and criminals in some countries of the European Union become heroes whose monuments are commemorated by sympathizers of the SS divisions. Lie is becoming the norm.

12

Mar

2025

Answers CS

Watch

Adoption of the proposal for a Parenthood Regulation (debate)

Excuse me, I am convinced that what I have said here has a real basis, for I have become acquainted with the fact that there really is a way to acquire children through surrogacy. There are such offers and this system is actually applied.

12

Mar

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

Adoption of the proposal for a Parenthood Regulation (debate)

Mr President, the proposal for a regulation on parenthood, which requires all Member States to recognise parenthood on equal terms, does not respect differences in national traditions and the will of communities. It notes that children’s rights arising from parenthood are to be protected regardless of the legal relationship between the parents and the way in which the child was conceived. Children's rights are not being questioned today. Extramarital children are not subjected to the contempt they were 100 years ago. But this regulation is really about the rights of parents, no matter how they have attained parenthood. Not everyone is eligible for proper childcare, but it is not possible to proceed as they do Barnevernet Norway, which takes away more than 1,000 children a year from parents. There is a risk of legalization of child trafficking, which is already in operation. Children should not be traded. The proposed regulation would allow children bought in one country to be legalised across the EU.

12

Feb

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

Collaboration between conservatives and far right as a threat for competitiveness in the EU (topical debate)

Mr President, the issue is the threat of cooperation between conservatives and the far right to the competitiveness of the European Union. The world doesn't follow the labels you give out. Not only the threat, but the real cause of the inability to compete is the majority of this Parliament and the European Commission, which have pushed Green Deal and anti-Russian sanctions. These have led to an increase in energy prices, which is reflected in all prices and increases the price of production, which is difficult to enforce on the market. Instead of fifty-eight sexes, you should be interested in the standard of living of citizens, the decline of which is ensured by the outflow of the fittest. Instead of promoting immigration, you should promote birth rates and stop degrading school education. Those you call conservatives and the far right are actually rational politicians trying to defend the decline of the European Union countries caused by you, not the left, but the far left and the irresponsible neoliberal right.

22

Jan

2025

Speeches CS

Watch

Addressing EU demographic challenges: towards the implementation of the 2023 Demography Toolbox (debate)

Mr President, population decline is a symptom of the collapse of society. Society has dissolved into individuals who do not have a sense of belonging and responsibility to any community, nor to the wider family, nor to the community, nor to the nation, nor to the state that they consider to be their own. They do not feel that they should contribute to the common good. The young generation, who are expected to bear offspring, in their majority, under the influence of ideology since childhood, feels that creditors and society are indebted, and the purpose of life is fun. They believe that having offspring does not bring any benefits, because they can rely on themselves, and in the event of failure, the company has to repay the debt it owes to them. People live in a very unstable social situation. Separate living is inaccessible to an increasing number of people and living in isolation has not taught them cooperation, mutual respect and responsibility. The European Commission will not come up with a solution, it is part of the problem.

18

Dec

2024

Speeches CS

Watch

Restoring the EU’s competitive edge – the need for an impact assessment on the Green Deal policies (topical debate)

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the irresponsible and unintelligent interference in the economies of the countries of the European Union has caused the current decline. Nonsensical interventions in education have led to a deterioration in the training of citizens for professions and a deterioration in the level of education in technical fields. The number of competitive graduates in technical and scientific fields is decreasing. The Absurd Project Green Deal It is based on fraud and already today, when not all its idiotic ideas have been implemented, it is destroying the economies of the countries of the European Union and with it the social conditions of the majority of citizens. Perhaps it is not a mistake, perhaps it is an intention that should also serve to extend the war to the countries of the European Union. The environment deserves real protection and we deserve protection from the deal Green Deal. The impact should have been assessed in advance. Only an idiot acts without thinking and then is surprised by the consequences.

18

Dec

2024

Speeches CS

Watch

Preparation of the EU-Western Balkans Summit (debate)

Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, the naive citizens of the Western Balkan countries believe in the advent of prosperity by joining the European Union. They will be severely disappointed. They have had and will continue to have to meet a number of conditions that do not benefit them. They are expected to relinquish their sovereignty, comply with regulations and implement directives without resistance. They are supposed to open their market for foreign goods and thus allow the entry of stronger companies. They should count on the fact that soon nothing will belong to them in their countries. They will not be part of the Schengen area for a long time. It will be easier for people who can work in richer countries to leave and strengthen the economies of stronger countries and weaken their own. The demographic structure will deteriorate, as in the Baltic countries and the Eastern Balkans. Central European countries will become net payers. Enlargement of the European Union will be of some benefit to multinational corporations.

27

Nov

2024

Speeches CS

Watch

Topical debate (Rule 169) - Budapest Declaration on the New European Competitiveness Deal - A future for the farming and manufacturing sectors in the EU (topical debate)

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, the future of agriculture in the European Union is very bleak. Small farms are rapidly disappearing and large businesses are being hampered. Villages are disappearing. The European Union is dominated by transnational trading chains, which benefit from importing agricultural commodities halfway around the globe, at dumped prices and of dubious origin. Buy-in prices are falling or stagnating, costs are rising. Green Deal is a set of barriers to farming in general and in agriculture in particular. The Greens, Socialists, Leftists and Progressives of the Renew Group are inventing further obstacles to agricultural development. It is threatened by self-sufficiency, or rather, in many commodities long ago is not. We all know this, and yet there is talk of the European Union helping rural development. It is necessary to abandon everything that unreasonably hinders agriculture in the countries of the European Union and return to rational, responsible thinking about the future of our countries and their citizens.

25

Nov

2024

Speeches CS

Watch

International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women (debate)

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, no statements or announcements of international days will limit violence in society. It will help to cultivate people by appropriate upbringing and punishment against those who have failed to be brought up. Talking about elimination is either naive or hypocritical. Violence cannot be eradicated. Unfortunately, violence will increase as people become more socially isolated and frustrated. If violence against women is the only thing that matters, and violence against men is uninteresting, it would certainly be beneficial if the influx of untouched men into the countries of the European Union were to end. Interestingly, the same activists verbally fighting violence against women are also pushing for immigration, including from primitive areas in Muslim countries. It is not difficult to conclude that they seem to have a mess in their head.