What Krzysztof spoke about.

Madam President, I'm sorry. Mr. Commissioner, I'm sorry. The general objective of the 8th Environment Action Programme is to accelerate the European Union’s transition to a climate-neutral economy. In Poland, my country, whose energy economy is largely based on fossil fuels, one of the sensitivities of this programme is the provisions on the withdrawal of environmentally harmful subsidies, including those for fossil fuels. The ECR will vote against the EU Environment Action Programme because, firstly, the programme calls for the phasing out of fossil fuel subsidies, the replacement of which by alternative energy sources would be extremely time- and cost-consuming, and is therefore a burdensome demand, impossible to achieve in the short term, especially now during the war. Second, the nature of the plan does not justify resolving issues relating to future commitments of Member States and the date for phasing out fossil fuel subsidies should be set out in a separate legal act. Thirdly, the programme comes at a time of unprecedented energy crisis, but it does not address the problem of energy poverty. Fourthly, the action programme does not seize the opportunity to take into account carbon sinks, which have a high potential in agriculture, where CO2 is absorbed by the soil.

Madam President, I'm sorry. Commissioner, I'm sorry. For many years, the aim of cohesion policy has been to strengthen economic, social and territorial cohesion between the areas of the European Union. Under cohesion policy 2021-2027, Poland will receive EUR 72 billion, which will be allocated to the implementation of investments resulting from the state development policy. It is positive for Poland that we will once again receive a programme for Eastern Poland, which will accelerate the development of these most delayed voivodships. The main objective of this programme is to consolidate the conditions conducive to the competitiveness of the macro-region and a higher quality of life in Poland. The common financial framework that we have adopted and cohesion policy are being implemented with a two-year delay due to the introduction of a two-year transition period. The Polish government submitted the Partnership Agreement, the national operational programmes on 15 December 2021 and the regional programmes will be submitted on 15 March 2022. These documents are to be approved in accordance with the Commission declaration by the end of June 2022. We await their urgent approval. Poland is a country that effectively uses European funds, thanks to which the differences related to the standard of living of its inhabitants in relation to more developed countries are rapidly decreasing. This confirms the need to pursue policies leading to an equal standard of living in the different regions of the country. Cohesion policy, in accordance with Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, must be more open to tasks related to rural infrastructure development and tasks in the agri-food sector. In my view, it is also necessary to revise the implementation system for the 2023-2027 period in terms of introducing significant simplifications and a more flexible approach to the objectives of the European Green Deal, given the new challenges arising from COVID-19 and Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine.

Madam President, I'm sorry. Commissioner, I'm sorry. In Poland, animal welfare on farms is maintained. The existing legislation in this area is sufficient and we are constantly increasing the level of well-being. The implementation report on animal welfare on farms contains 55 conclusions and recommendations, some of which I consider appropriate. Thus, first, by the end of 2023, the European Commission will evaluate and review animal welfare legislation, including on the transport and slaughter of animals. Secondly, the European Commission will ensure investment in the welfare of livestock farmers. Thirdly, calling on the European Union to provide financial resources and an appropriate time horizon for farmers should any changes be made to the rules on animal husbandry. Fourthly, the need to carry out a scientific assessment and to take into account the consumer’s purchasing power when making legislative changes. Fifth, a voluntary approach to the animal welfare labelling scheme. Sixth, call for short food supply chains based on locally produced food. Seventhly, I do not support point 17 of the report on the European Parliament’s support for the citizens’ initiative entitled ‘Let’s put an end to cage farming’, which refers to the complete cessation of the rearing and rearing of animals in a cage system.

Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, I'm sorry. The report highlights the many difficulties faced by people with disabilities. It is clear that people with disabilities need special support. Their rights and dignity need to be protected and help in areas of particular relevance to them, such as health and education, to enable them to participate widely in society or the labour market. The resolution also refers to digitalisation as an opportunity to integrate vulnerable groups, while also requiring investment in appropriate digital skills. However, it is important to separate the real need to help those in need from the imposition of ideological issues. The resolution should not mention the Istanbul Convention, which contains harmful elements, such as the idea of gender as a socio-cultural choice that can be freely made. For this reason, the ECR Group will not support the above-mentioned report.

Mr President, thank you very much. Commissioner, I'm sorry. Biodiversity is essential to life. More than half of the world's GDP depends on nature. The Commission's report focuses on the need to address the root causes of biodiversity loss and restore ecosystems. The positive side of this report is to highlight the dependence of agri-food systems and smallholders on biodiversity; recognise the rights of indigenous peoples and their knowledge and experience in the fight against biodiversity loss and environmental degradation and underline the fact that environmental crime poses a global threat to nature conservation and sustainable development, stability and security. Unfortunately, the project also has some drawbacks. We do not support the addition of recognition of the right to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the introduction of a system of criminal sanctions and multilateral environmental agreements. The ECR will therefore abstain.

Mr President, thank you very much. Mr. Commissioner, I'm sorry. All available indicators show that we are not on track to avoid hunger in the world by 2030. The Union should reflect before renewing and strengthening its commitment to ending hunger and ensuring the right to adequate food in the world. Experts point out that the Green Deal will disrupt the ability to feed the world's population, and that other countries will take our place in the global market for food expansion without blinking. The experts' report clearly shows that, as a result of the implementation of the Green Deal, agricultural production in all branches will collapse, production efficiency and thus the value of EU agricultural exports will decrease drastically. According to scientists, cereal yields in the European Union will fall by 11%. The same applies to milk and other raw materials. It follows from the above that the Union has other objectives than eradicating hunger in the world. Commitment to the world seems inappropriate if we take into account the current policies of the European Union. To help the building citizens of the world, the Union should buy surplus food from farmers and pass it on to those who are starving to death. It can also help by transferring its state-of-the-art crop and animal production technologies, which yield the highest yields and the largest meat production.

Mr President, thank you very much. Mr. Commissioner, I'm sorry. The European Commission's Communication on the New European Research Area contains important data and information showing that, firstly, the 2030 target of 3% of GDP for R&D investment is far from being achieved by the Member States of the European Union. Secondly, a more effective transfer of research results to the real economy is needed to stimulate business investment. In Poland, the new recently adopted economic development strategy called the Polish Deal includes tax breaks for prototypes, reductions for industrial robotization or reductions to support employee investments. Let us remember that research and development can also effectively solve the problems of agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe, as evidenced by the BIOEAST initiative, which aims to increase the participation of 13 countries, i.e. Central European countries, in the Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe framework programmes for research and innovation in agriculture and the bioeconomy, due to the fact that these countries have so far received little funds for this purpose.

Mr President, thank you very much. The 8th Environment Programme to be in place until 2030 aims to accelerate the transition to a climate-neutral, resource-efficient, clean and circular economy in a just and inclusive manner and to achieve the environmental objectives of the UN 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development Goals. While this objective seems reasonable, the report's attempt to include the need to phase out all fossil fuel subsidies at EU, national, regional and local level by 2025 at the latest makes the report unacceptable for countries such as Poland, where fossil fuels now make up a large part of the energy mix and gas is expected to be a bridge to the wider use of renewable energy sources in the coming years. I will therefore vote against the solutions contained in the report.