Speeches

Madam President, That's really interesting. So now the Greens are complaining that there are people who live in energy poverty. Let me tell you something: Many people also live in Germany and, for example, can no longer pay their electricity bills. They don't know how to warm their homes. And do you know who that is? On your green policy! That's what it's all about! But now to blame the fossil fuel companies again, that's exactly what you greens can do: Always point your finger at others. Change your fucking green deal policy, damn it!

Madam President, In the best von der Leyen manner – formerly called nepotism – von der Leyen negotiated a contract for EUR 35 billion via SMS with the CEO of Pfizer. If she already refuses to disclose all the documents and to follow an invitation to the COVID Committee, and also persistently ignores the ombudsman's questions and even smiles away the complaint of the European Court of Auditors with an arrogant shrug, then we as Parliament von der Leyen must show the red card at the latest now that the prosecutor's office is investigating her for corruption. It's bad enough that the President of the Commission is corrupt. But a parliament that covers this corruption is the same and robbed... (The President withdrew the floor from the speaker.)

Madam President, Today we celebrate International Women's Day, a day to remember women's struggle for the right to vote and celebrate the achievements of being able to lead a self-determined life as a woman. But what do we do instead? Self-proclaimed feminists presumed to dictate to women how to live their lives; And as is so common with socialists and Marxists, all women are forced into the corset of an ideologically defined collective need. (Interruptions / tumults) And just where you're bouncing around, that's what happens. There is no room here for individual or even self-determined lifestyles. What's more: Under the pretext of making women more visible, our language is squandered – this is called gender-appropriate language – only to immediately make the women who are then made visible disappear again. To the simple question: What is a woman? – there is only one answer: an adult person of the female sex – you get minutes of stammering and then save yourself in terms such as uterine menstruator and the like. This House also prides itself on fighting violence against women and, in turn, does the opposite, such as in changing rooms, toilets and the like – women’s shelters. There, under threat of social ostracism or even criminal prosecution, women must now also endure the presence of men. Not with me! Transgender women are not women. (Applause) Those who disguise themselves as Indians are socially ostracized by them for cultural appropriation. Why aren't men disguised as women accused of sexual appropriation? (Applause) Those who want to strengthen women's freedom and self-determination cannot continue in this way. You are doing contempt for women in pure culture here, ladies and gentlemen! (Interruptions / tumults)

Madam President, I have to say: That this House is not ashamed to put forward such a proposal at all! We are talking about the killing of unborn life. You don't have to get pregnant anymore if you don't want to. What you are pursuing here, and also as a human right, really lacks any decency, any character. Abortion as a – in principle – contraceptive after the act is certainly not an adequate means to advance the liberalisation of women. You should be ashamed! I am voting against this motion, and I hope you will follow me.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen! I hope you're here today to look in the mirror and ask yourself: Are you really proud of what you have achieved? Proud of your many motions, initiatives in this legislature? The leitmotif that Ursula von der Leyen sent ahead at the beginning:  over everything. Yes, it has left deep marks. Tears of joy have flowed here in this House when you declared a climate emergency and thus created another basis for making citizens pay, pay and pay again. Well, the result can be seen in Germany. Our economy is on the ground, a wave of bankruptcy is overrunning the country. At the same time, you take out hundreds of thousands of farmers, freight forwarders, entrepreneurs and citizens like the Christmas geese. Citizens have their noses pissed off and they are finally taking to the streets. Rightly so! Because it can't go on like this! The current policy in Germany is increasingly interfering with our fundamental rights. This assault by the state on private life is not only worrying, but dangerous. We see a policy directed against our own citizens, a policy of regulation, taxation, restriction without regard to the needs and rights of citizens. Ladies and gentlemen, this is much more than politics. It's about our rights, our freedom and our future. We must work together to combat this excessive regulation and interference with our fundamental rights. We must support a policy that focuses on the interests of the people. I call on all of you: Stop chafing citizens and letting them pay for their insane ideological bullshit projects! Instead of the German government taking note of the criticism of its policies, it insults the protesters as extremists and enemies of the constitution in order to silence them. But not the people, not the peasants are the extremists. The real extremists are sitting on the German government bank. Criticizing the government is not anti-constitutional. But a government that disregards the people and does not implement their will is anti-constitutional!

Mr President! In the midst of the debate about the care of refugees and their basic needs, this house does not identify food, clothing and shelter, but abortion as one of the most elementary needs of all. Are you still doing well? Unless you finally take a look at a point that this House has so far deliberately ignored: Before the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, Ukraine was the paradise of illegal child trafficking. Couples from all over the world, especially Western democracies, were able to order children through Ukrainian surrogate mothers, much cheaper than in their respective home countries. Under Ukrainian law, the surrogate mother had no rights to the biological child she was carrying. The birth certificate was issued exclusively to the paying purchasers as parents. Legal disputes in the event that the ordered child did not meet the expectations were pre-programmed. Are these the European values of which you are constantly speaking and which you are obligating the European peoples to defend at their expense? What does this mean for biological mothers? Quite simply: With EU applause, these women become victims of your inhumane abortion campaign, under which you degrade and exploit the women to birth machines, exploiting their financial hardship. This House thus supports the systematic trafficking of children in disregard of the dignity of these children and the dignity and rights of their mothers. Yes, when the left calls for ‘Slava Ukrajini’, this also means the exploitation and deprivation of rights of these Ukrainian women. You'd have to take action against that, but you don't.

Madam President, In Germany, an authority bound by instructions, the so-called constitutional protection, sees its task as hindering and preventing the opposition. President Haldenwang recently said it was not just his job to lower the AfD's poll scores. No, it's not his job to do that. This is a very clear violation of competence and also a blatant violation of the requirement of neutrality. This is the conclusion reached by at least several renowned state and constitutional lawyers. An authority subordinate to the government, which denigrates the opposition and systematically obstructs it, does not protect the constitution, but protects the government and thus constitutes a clear, unconstitutional fact. Such blatant and obvious violations of the principles of democracy and the rule of law cannot and must not leave this House uncommented or unchallenged. I therefore request, on behalf of the ID Group, a corresponding extension of the agenda for a debate and a Commission opinion on this for Tuesday afternoon, with a corresponding extension of the meeting on Tuesday.

Mr President! Protecting women from sexual harassment – absolute consent. This initiative Plus will not contribute to this. In the spirit of the continued mass import of a colorful, tolerant, diverse, but above all misogynistic multicultural culture, the workplace is being targeted as a place of horror for women. Far from it! In the outdoor pools, on public streets, squares, on buses and trains, women are sexually harassed, groped, raped and desecrated in the worst possible way. No wonder, because these are the places where the protection-seeking gold pieces romp around the dear long day to pursue their women-deprecating day-to-day business. You want to protect women? Then finally close the borders, stop the mass import of this brutal and raw sexual violence against women. If this is done, then we can talk about whether the invitation to a coffee at the workplace is actually sexual harassment or not just politeness among colleagues.

Madam President, Yes, the Istanbul Convention – again. A tool that should actually be available to combat violence against women. What was intended as a politically correct and important signal against domestic violence or violence against women turns out once again to be a mere hanger for another fantastic commercial for a whole potpourri of ideological nonsense from the house of this sham democracy. The fact that the EU does not even shy away from instrumentalising the alleged fight against violence against women in order to curtail the state sovereignty of the Member States is hardly worth the excitement. Early on, it is precisely what a dictatorial EU superstate wants to become. But instrumentalizing violence against women to implement ideological absurdities can only be understood by those victims of domestic violence as the very slap in the face that this House claims to be fighting. Unfortunately, the perpetrators – usually imported would-be machos – do not leave their misogynistic views as easily at the borders as their passports. This really cruel violence against women in Europe could be prevented so easily. A significant contribution would already be made if only the illegal crossing of the border of millions of young men, who are violently afflicted by an archaic image of women, were prevented. Securing one's own territory was until recently the natural right of every sovereign state. Of course, this house does not come up with such an idea. No, the most effective possible protection of women from violence unfortunately has to lag behind the tolerance-drunkness of the world improvers gathered here. But, dear women, next year too, this European Parliament will once again present to you in celebrated speeches of concern how it does not intend to protect you.

Madam President, The EU Global Health Strategy is summarised in a few sentences: Throw billions of taxpayer dollars in profits in the throat for a useless, harmful, even deadly product. Pass on the cost of the damage caused by the death injections to the taxpayer. Empower the President of the Commission to personally enrich her own husband in the performance of her duties. Transfer the power of government to the WHO and thus incapacitate the peoples constituting democracies. Sell all this for the good of the people, stigmatize, insult, ridicule and ostracize all those who see it differently. This is not about health, ladies and gentlemen, but about wresting popular rule from the sovereign peoples of Europe. The last three years have shown: The interests of the EU, the WHO and Big Pharma Public health is just as important as the arms industry's interest in world peace, not at all.

Mr President! The European Parliament is once again inciting everything and everyone against each other, in the spirit of ‘divide and rule’. In order to be able to demand a gender-equal salary, everyone should now know what their colleagues deserve. Thus, arrogance and arrogance on the one hand, envy, resentment and discord on the other hand, will determine the working atmosphere in the future. If there are no male colleagues to whose salary one could demand adjustment, then one fabricates imaginary male colleagues and demands salary adjustment to their imaginary salary. If, despite intensive searches, there is no actual salary discrimination, then the mere existence of a theoretical possibility of salary discrimination is sufficient to be able to assert equality claims. Her obsession with gender equality is taking on such delusional traits that I have to ask myself seriously by now: Who puts their shoes on every morning?

Madam President, Criminals exploit poverty in developing countries to bring children into the EU as human commodities, often for the purpose of sexual exploitation or organ trafficking. Adoption regulations must aim at finding genuinely caring adoptive parents for these children, closing legal loopholes to prevent the disappearance of thousands of children in the EU. Protecting children from pedophiles and sexual exploitation – that and only that can and must be their goal. However, if it were the attempt to secure the supply of children to the Rainbow Mafia, then the final proof of the abysmal malice of this house would be provided.

Madam President, These activists – I would call them fanatics – do not defend victims of human trafficking, women at risk of genital mutilation, rape victims, victims of domestic violence or children who are abused. On the contrary: As lobbyists in the abortion industry, they deny millions of unborn children the most comprehensive human right ever: The right to life. And one more thing: Anyone who makes abortion a socially accepted contraceptive after the act refuses women to be fundamentally responsible decision-makers. That, ladies and gentlemen, is misogyny. par excellence. You should be a little ashamed. And, by the way, I am speaking in front of exactly 19 deputies out of 705. We should also be ashamed of that.

Mr President! How does this House feel about democracy? Well, in a Member State as unpopular here as Hungary or Poland, if someone at a university is approached with the wrong pronoun, then one falls into snapshot here, and a huge debate takes place. If, on the other hand, there is systematic repression of the political opposition in a Member State, there is great silence here, if not secretly cheering. At the AfD party conference in Hesse, the hallmarks of all participants were documented and published on the Internet on the far-left platform Indymedia. On the basis of this information, more than a dozen vehicles were damaged by party colleagues in a hotel parking lot the following night. At the AfD party conference in Baden-Württemberg, left-wing protesters escalated in such a way that 53 police officers were injured. The political struggle in Germany has long since reached a new dimension. It is not used with arguments, but with violence against the opposition. There is open political persecution. Meanwhile, 50% of all violent attacks on the political parties are directed against the AfD. Whoever defends democracy only where it suits him, and not wherever it is necessary, everything is different, but not a democrat.

Madam President, I had drafted an opinion for the FEMM Committee on this report. I stressed the importance of equality between men and women. I condemned all violence against women and found that this violence had increased dramatically, especially during the COVID-19 lockdown. I called for vigorous action against the suffering of women who had been victims of human trafficking and sexual exploitation. But instead of taking a stand on these essential fundamental problems, this report has been reinterpreted as a true potpourri of ideological nonsense: Abortion, climate change, gender insanity. What you call the defence of democracy is ideological nonsense that you intend to impose on European peoples by abolishing democratic principles. I say yes to freedom, democracy and the rule of law and therefore clearly no to this report.

Madam President, here you all go again. In shock about Iran this time. All the while, carefully avoiding to call the devil by its name. Masha did not die because of some fundamentalists abusing Islam. Masha died because she would not subdue to Islam. There is no such thing as Islamism. It is Islam, point blank. And now go ahead, call me Islamophobe all you want. Heck, have them issue a fatwa against me and see if I care. The truth is, I am not afraid of Islam. The Islam apologists, the one patronising Islam, calling it the religion of peace, even. They are the ones afraid of Islam. Again, I am not afraid of Islam. I do, however, strongly object to this misogynistic, misanthropic and totalitarian ideology. And if you truly cared about freedom, democracy and the rule of law, you would stop your bigotry and for once have the guts to acknowledge the true problem. It is called Islam.

Madam President, Binding quotas for women in the top floors: Vocational qualifications were yesterday – the right gender is today. After years of fighting for equality to give no importance to gender, and it didn't matter whether man or woman, we now raise gender again to the all-important criterion. This is not progress, this is regression – regression to a Marxist ideological, better world in which an elite authority curtails individual freedom in favour of the supposed needs of the collective. World improvement fanatics who believe they have to force people to their happiness do not create happy people. They create oppressed people – and a world where people are oppressed is not a better world; It is an authoritarian, dictatorial world. I don't want that, and I hope you don't either.

– Madam President, ladies and gentlemen! In the election to the Berlin House of Representatives, there were serious structural errors, the accusation of election fraud is in the room: Votes were missing, were exchanged, polling stations had temporarily closed, others were still open long after the official voter. The head of state has since resigned. The Berlin Constitutional Court has now declared the elections invalid. Fair and free elections are the foundation of any democracy and there will be talk about how such conditions could have happened in the best Germany of all time. Let us show that this House is fundamentally concerned with violations of democracy and the rule of law, whether they occur in Germany or Hungary.

Madam President, Yes, ladies and gentlemen, this report shows once again the hypocritical approaches of the EU. According to this report, the aim of the Russian invasion of Ukraine is the destruction, extinction of Ukrainian culture and European culture and common identity. You have to ask: What is our common identity? I think this is about the Ukrainian people, and of course the Ukrainian people have an independent, Ukrainian identity. So Putin wasn't really about it now, and to be honest, we wouldn't need Putin for that either to destroy European culture and erase common identities. After all, the EU achieves this much better through continuous and successive arrogance of competence. In principle, we are not only dealing with gender mainstreaming, but also with cultural mainstreaming. And this is where we are dealing with the equalisation of all cultures – but it has nothing to do with national or cultural identity. In the future, when it comes to the EU, the Ukrainian cultural identity should also be reflected in the common identity. And this common identity – dear Ukrainian people, listen carefully! – is first and foremost climate delusion, LGBTQI – I cannot even say it correctly – diversity, tolerance and acceptance – but tolerance and acceptance do not refer to yours, to Ukrainian values, but to those of everyone else in the world. There is also talk of protecting works of art. Yes, at the same time, in our so-called much praised European culture, we do not even manage to educate our own adolescents to so much decency and respect that they do not storm into museums and smear works of art with all kinds of colors there, in order to stick to it afterwards. They are also pulling off motorways, animated by the delusion of having to save the world, endangering human lives in the here and now, possibly in decades due to some imaginary super-GAU crisis – here too, utter madness. And then of course, that should not be missing: Of course, Russian disinformation must also be tackled. And then you have to say: What does the EU do first? Yes, it does exactly what Putin did when he wanted to prevent disinformation, because he blocked broadcasters. This is now our understanding in the EU to fight disinformation. On the other hand, of course, ladies and gentlemen: We have enough to return to our own front door. I mean, the European Commission is the headquarters of the producers of disinformation. I'm just reminding you of that unspeakable, yes, injection campaign that was driven there. As I said, dear Ukrainians, if you really care about your cultural identity, run as fast and as far as you... (The President withdrew the floor from the speaker.)

Mr President! Yes, the EU! Through the GDPR, the EU claims to be particularly committed to data protection. However, the Data Protection Regulation does not protect data – as so much in the EU. We have a whole jungle of privacy notices, consent forms – data does not protect them. They annoy the citizens without end. But on the other hand, the EU is doing everything it can to create the glass citizen. Citizens are forced to reveal even sensitive and highly personal data, such as health and vaccination status, to anyone, whether in the restaurant or in the shoe shop, using coloured bracelets, stickers and, now on offer, coloured QR codes. China says hello. But if Members of this House are spied on, then the outrage is great. I'm just afraid your problem isn't the spying itself, it's more that it's about possibly not spying on the right ones. Well, in Germany there is a solution to this problem: In Germany, extra-parliamentary opposition forces, critical journalists and even the parliamentary opposition can be officially spied on and monitored by the Federal Constitutional Protection. This is called the defense of democracy. I call it totalitarian.

Madam President, In this chic ivory tower, hardly anyone knows about poverty, but so be it. Poverty must be tackled, and the EU knows how. So we are now prescribing to the citizens how they have to shape their very personal way of life within their own four walls. Personal career or career planning is designed at the EU's drawing board, as is the case in the beautiful new world. The EU decides which teaching content leads to a good education, and rebellious Member States, which stubbornly insist that education falls within their regulatory competence, are turned to the money cock with continued reluctance. Another report that omits ideological nonsense to the Member States. But because the fight against poverty prevails, a large majority of MEPs, of whom only nine are present on this important issue, will once again enthusiastically support it. This report does not fight poverty, it fights freedom, democracy and the rule of law, like everything that comes from this House.

Madam President, In its judgment of 15 June 2022, the Federal Constitutional Court attested to former Federal Chancellor Merkel’s unconstitutional conduct when she called the democratic election of the Prime Minister of Thuringia in February 2020 unforgivable, spoke of a bad day for democracy and demanded that this election be reversed. What would have happened in this House if, let's say, Viktor Orbán had acted like Merkel and the Hungarian Constitutional Court had certified him to be acting unconstitutionally? Hyperventilating, Orbán would be attested to hostility to the constitution in countless urgent debates and the entire repertoire of rule of law mechanisms would be lustfully blown around his ears. In this case, however, quite rightly. The resounding silence of this House on Merkel's breach of the constitution is significant. Now Merkel is – finally – gone, but her ominous legacy – anti-democratic structures – is still firmly under Germany’s control. Proceedings against Germany must therefore be initiated urgently so that the unfortunate Merkelism does not turn Germany into a GDR 2.0 and the EU into an EU-SSR.

Madam President, Erasmus programmes are a good thing. Encouraging the participation of disabled students who wish to become involved in Erasmus programmes is commendable. Enabling young people to travel to and learn from various European nations, cultures, traditions and values while improving their academic skills is quite an achievement. In order to keep it that way, let us make sure that we maintain our focus on supporting students’ development into competent, capable and multi-skilled citizens for the benefit of European nations and society at large. Let us avoid mixing educational programmes with political points that belong in a separate sphere. Let us keep in mind – whatever path students take, including towards Erasmus – it all comes down to their personal choice. Paving the way for a strong and functioning society involves respecting rather than forcing personal decisions about education. We want Erasmus to remain what it is: a desirable option and not an opportunity to score unsolicited political points.

Madam President, wow, the headline of this resolution already says it all. You're talking about a global threat. It just always has to be superlatives with you, doesn't it? Promoters of this debate should read the Treaties of the European Union first. This Parliament has no competence to lecture sovereign countries on how they should govern themselves. The USA is no longer a colony ruled from Europe. Didn't you know that? So if their Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade as being unconstitutional, yeah, they can do that! If they decide that their federal law no longer protects the abortionists from criminal prosecution, yeah, they can do that too! And if they put decisions on how to run maternal healthcare, abortion choices, back to democratically elected leaders in their 50 states, guess what? They can do that too! And if those states then believe life in the womb is worth protecting, as the UN Convention on the Rights of Children states by the way, yep, they can do that too! You know what your problem is? You just won't take ‘no’ for an answer. You will simply not accept anyone not in support of your dystopian brave new world agenda. As seen here today earlier, by the way, if a vote doesn't go your way, all hell breaks loose and the vote will be repeated until the result suits you. So much for democracy in this House. So whenever you are hyperventilating about some sort of a ‘global threat’, what you are really fighting against is the collapse of your ridiculous utopia in which humans are a malleable mass. This is despicable and it's dehumanising. And I am ashamed to have to say this in this House.

Madam President, it was rather absurd when Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, lectured this House on freedom, democracy and the rule of law, considering the quasi totalitarian regime he runs in Canada. Unvaccinated Canadians are not allowed to board an airplane to leave the country. While unvaccinated passengers pose no risk to anyone, the vaccinated pilots, however, might. This vaccine may have actually rendered them unfit to fly. What a shocker! But aside from that, countries, which deny their own citizens to leave the country do so because they are a dictatorship. Why is the EU Parliament not all over Trudeau calling him out for these violations of human rights? Oh wait, since the EU Parliament is completely in line with the globalists’ sick, brave new world agenda, it only calls out governments which actually respect freedom, democracy and the rule of law.