Speeches

Madam President, Donald Trump announces his new cabinet: highly competent patriots, determined to Make America Great AgainDetermined to make politics for the people again. And what do we get? You, Ms von der Leyen, thank you very much! The wrecking ball that mercilessly tears down everything that has made the European peoples strong. I want a Europe that is strong, sovereign and successful; a Europe of success, a Europe of freedom, democracy and the rule of law. We won't get all this with you. Mrs. von der Leyen, you alone would be bad enough. But the aspiring commissioners you have gathered around you are the purest squad of debris in terms of freedom and democracy and the rule of law. First of all, Mrs von der Leyen, give an account of your unspeakable mRNA vaccine supply contracts. Otherwise, you can put your proposal of the Commissioners on the hat. My group will not support this. Well, regrettably, I can't call you corrupt, otherwise I'll be turned off the microphone here again, but be that as it may: Frau von der Leyen, you are corrupt to the last fibre of your existence!

Madam President, So today you are complaining about the misuse of new technologies, which is supposed to radicalize our youth. It is your radical politics that divides and incites people. During Corona, you have declared parts of the people enemies, turning the unvaccinated into scapegoats. Voices about the harmfulness of the mRNA injection were censored away so that your vaccination propaganda remained unchallenged. Government-critical voices suppress you while you look the other way, when YouTube, TikTok and co. celebrate the worst Islamic anti-Semitism and this misogynistic, inhuman and totalitarian ideology of Islam eats itself through our society. The supposed radicalization you want to fight is the long overdue response to the radicalism of your policies, this unspeakable, illegal mass invasion. Stop being ridiculous! Instead of censoring critics, take the criticism seriously and finally make politics for your own people again, then there will be no radicalization among the people!

Mr President! We are talking about mental health. But what has driven people to madness in recent years? Coercive measures, lockdown, isolation, mask duty and the pressure to get vaccinated. You played particularly badly with the children. Instead of childlike carefreeness, play and laughter: Isolation, fear and social cold. Many of them are still suffering from the consequences today. Child psychologists hardly follow suit. But soldiers, such as Jan Reiners and Alexander Bittner, were also treated as serious criminals. They were even sent to prison for refusing orders to inject a potentially lethal substance. In addition, there is climate delusion, gender stereotypes and hate speech, the fight against Islamophobia and racism – all this ideological nonsense. It's your policies that drive people crazy. If you really wanted to put the mental health of the citizens on the right track, then you simply stopped your unbearable stigmatization and exclusion policy towards your own citizens. That's where you should start. The mental, healthy fight against mental illness belongs there and must start from this house here. Stop talking about your ideology. It's unbearable.

Mr President! The two regulations on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices of 2017 have caused bureaucratic chaos. In a hysterical overreaction to a scandal in breast implants, a regulatory chaos was created, which led to innovation and production of critical medical technology being much more expensive and new approvals of products delayed. Only the approval of lethal mRNA injections, which went quite quickly in this house. But be that as it may, Peter Liese of the German Christian Democrats, you were one of the two rapporteurs responsible for this chaos. You are now turning yourself into a champion against the very bureaucracy that you yourself have created. Our predecessor group, the EFDD, had wisely submitted a rejection request against your bureaucratic monster in 2017, which – you probably suspect – was rejected. If you can rely on one thing in this House, it is that there are fundamentally decisions that are the opposite of good, right and meaningful. Ceterum censeo – this shop should be abolished!

Madam President, The AfD scored more than 30% in the elections in East Germany. In Thuringia, she even won the election by a large margin. Instead of respecting the will of the electorate, parliamentary rules of procedure are changed and even a request for a ban on the AfD is made in the Bundestag - all this under the brazen claim that democracy is defended. Those who do so are not afraid of democracy, they are afraid of democracy. In a democracy, parties whose policies the citizen disagrees with are voted out of office. Instead of the penalised parties now going their own way and changing their devastating policies, they are stomping their feet – like defiant children – and bragging: If in Hungary a left-green actor does not get his desired role in a theatre, the European Parliament shouts: Your deafening silence on the actual repression of the opposition in Germany is revealing. Do you want to be a Democrat? They are hypocrites – all of them!

Mr President! In the case of coronavirus, the EU has licked blood and usurped a new field of competence: our health. To protect them, there has been unprecedented disenfranchisement, stigma, defamation and exclusion of citizens. Ursula von der Leyen has perfected the nepotism model, which could also be called corruption. While billions and billions of dollars in profits have been poured into the pharmaceutical industry, taxpayers are still sitting on damages of the same amount. The last scandals for which von der Leyen is responsible – allegations of corruption in connection with mRNA injection procurement, deleted text messages, redacted contracts, her persistent refusal to answer the questions of Members of the COVID Committee, to name but a few – are not even partially resolved, as the whole haunting starts all over again. This time the disease is called monkeypox. The WHO has already declared an international health emergency. BioNTech is building an mRNA vaccine factory in Africa in anticipation of the next billion-dollar blessing, because the orders of the EU Commission are already a mere formality. Why we are even talking about it here today is not clear to me. Firstly: Monkey pox has no pandemic proportions. They are scarcely widespread and far from being a threat to the general public. Secondly: The EU has no competence on health. And thirdly: Certainly not if, as in the present case, the infection is limited to primarily African countries and even here only to specific risk groups. The EU Commission's presumption of competence is intolerable. Above all, however, a self-sufficiently acting President of Corruption must be put in her place and put in her trade.

Madam President, Mrs von der Leyen, you are a disgrace to any democracy. Her five years were more than enough. Green Deal, Fit for 55 – all these programmes are shaping the lives of EU citizens. deindustrialization, price explosion, abolition of freedom, democracy, censorship and harassment of citizens. That's your policy, Mrs. von der Leyen. Shame on you! Shame on you! With your Pfizer Duz friend, you negotiated a multi-billion dollar contract for a product that was useless at best, harmful at worst, and fatal in many cases. Once again: You should be embarrassed! Only the day before yesterday, the ECJ ruled that you should not have kept the contents of the vaccine contracts secret. Several corruption investigations are underway against you. If you had even a spark of decency in your body, you wouldn't even be running anymore. But: Decency – not reported to you. Mrs von der Leyen, you are the President of the Commission and not the President of corruption. They are not re-elected, but driven out of this Parliament and out of office in disgrace and shame. (The President withdrew the floor from the speaker.)

Madam President, I refer to Rule 128 on the election of the President of the Commission, which is on the agenda tomorrow. In this context, the European Council proposes to us Ursula von der Leyen – Ursula von der Leyen, a candidate involved in numerous affairs and suspected of having acted corruptly. At least, both the Liège Public Prosecutor’s Office and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office are investigating Ursula von der Leyen for corruption. Such a woman should not be allowed to run at all. I would therefore ask you, Madam President, to do everything in your power to ensure that Ursula von der Leyens can be legally elected and to postpone the election until further notice.

Madam President, That's really interesting. So now the Greens are complaining that there are people who live in energy poverty. Let me tell you something: Many people also live in Germany and, for example, can no longer pay their electricity bills. They don't know how to warm their homes. And do you know who that is? On your green policy! That's what it's all about! But now to blame the fossil fuel companies again, that's exactly what you greens can do: Always point your finger at others. Change your fucking green deal policy, damn it!

Madam President, In the best von der Leyen manner – formerly called nepotism – von der Leyen negotiated a contract for EUR 35 billion via SMS with the CEO of Pfizer. If she already refuses to disclose all the documents and to follow an invitation to the COVID Committee, and also persistently ignores the ombudsman's questions and even smiles away the complaint of the European Court of Auditors with an arrogant shrug, then we as Parliament von der Leyen must show the red card at the latest now that the prosecutor's office is investigating her for corruption. It's bad enough that the President of the Commission is corrupt. But a parliament that covers this corruption is the same and robbed... (The President withdrew the floor from the speaker.)

Madam President, Today we celebrate International Women's Day, a day to remember women's struggle for the right to vote and celebrate the achievements of being able to lead a self-determined life as a woman. But what do we do instead? Self-proclaimed feminists presumed to dictate to women how to live their lives; And as is so common with socialists and Marxists, all women are forced into the corset of an ideologically defined collective need. (Interruptions / tumults) And just where you're bouncing around, that's what happens. There is no room here for individual or even self-determined lifestyles. What's more: Under the pretext of making women more visible, our language is squandered – this is called gender-appropriate language – only to immediately make the women who are then made visible disappear again. To the simple question: What is a woman? – there is only one answer: an adult person of the female sex – you get minutes of stammering and then save yourself in terms such as uterine menstruator and the like. This House also prides itself on fighting violence against women and, in turn, does the opposite, such as in changing rooms, toilets and the like – women’s shelters. There, under threat of social ostracism or even criminal prosecution, women must now also endure the presence of men. Not with me! Transgender women are not women. (Applause) Those who disguise themselves as Indians are socially ostracized by them for cultural appropriation. Why aren't men disguised as women accused of sexual appropriation? (Applause) Those who want to strengthen women's freedom and self-determination cannot continue in this way. You are doing contempt for women in pure culture here, ladies and gentlemen! (Interruptions / tumults)

Madam President, I have to say: That this House is not ashamed to put forward such a proposal at all! We are talking about the killing of unborn life. You don't have to get pregnant anymore if you don't want to. What you are pursuing here, and also as a human right, really lacks any decency, any character. Abortion as a – in principle – contraceptive after the act is certainly not an adequate means to advance the liberalisation of women. You should be ashamed! I am voting against this motion, and I hope you will follow me.

Mr President, ladies and gentlemen! I hope you're here today to look in the mirror and ask yourself: Are you really proud of what you have achieved? Proud of your many motions, initiatives in this legislature? The leitmotif that Ursula von der Leyen sent ahead at the beginning:  over everything. Yes, it has left deep marks. Tears of joy have flowed here in this House when you declared a climate emergency and thus created another basis for making citizens pay, pay and pay again. Well, the result can be seen in Germany. Our economy is on the ground, a wave of bankruptcy is overrunning the country. At the same time, you take out hundreds of thousands of farmers, freight forwarders, entrepreneurs and citizens like the Christmas geese. Citizens have their noses pissed off and they are finally taking to the streets. Rightly so! Because it can't go on like this! The current policy in Germany is increasingly interfering with our fundamental rights. This assault by the state on private life is not only worrying, but dangerous. We see a policy directed against our own citizens, a policy of regulation, taxation, restriction without regard to the needs and rights of citizens. Ladies and gentlemen, this is much more than politics. It's about our rights, our freedom and our future. We must work together to combat this excessive regulation and interference with our fundamental rights. We must support a policy that focuses on the interests of the people. I call on all of you: Stop chafing citizens and letting them pay for their insane ideological bullshit projects! Instead of the German government taking note of the criticism of its policies, it insults the protesters as extremists and enemies of the constitution in order to silence them. But not the people, not the peasants are the extremists. The real extremists are sitting on the German government bank. Criticizing the government is not anti-constitutional. But a government that disregards the people and does not implement their will is anti-constitutional!

Mr President! In the midst of the debate about the care of refugees and their basic needs, this house does not identify food, clothing and shelter, but abortion as one of the most elementary needs of all. Are you still doing well? Unless you finally take a look at a point that this House has so far deliberately ignored: Before the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, Ukraine was the paradise of illegal child trafficking. Couples from all over the world, especially Western democracies, were able to order children through Ukrainian surrogate mothers, much cheaper than in their respective home countries. Under Ukrainian law, the surrogate mother had no rights to the biological child she was carrying. The birth certificate was issued exclusively to the paying purchasers as parents. Legal disputes in the event that the ordered child did not meet the expectations were pre-programmed. Are these the European values of which you are constantly speaking and which you are obligating the European peoples to defend at their expense? What does this mean for biological mothers? Quite simply: With EU applause, these women become victims of your inhumane abortion campaign, under which you degrade and exploit the women to birth machines, exploiting their financial hardship. This House thus supports the systematic trafficking of children in disregard of the dignity of these children and the dignity and rights of their mothers. Yes, when the left calls for ‘Slava Ukrajini’, this also means the exploitation and deprivation of rights of these Ukrainian women. You'd have to take action against that, but you don't.

Madam President, In Germany, an authority bound by instructions, the so-called constitutional protection, sees its task as hindering and preventing the opposition. President Haldenwang recently said it was not just his job to lower the AfD's poll scores. No, it's not his job to do that. This is a very clear violation of competence and also a blatant violation of the requirement of neutrality. This is the conclusion reached by at least several renowned state and constitutional lawyers. An authority subordinate to the government, which denigrates the opposition and systematically obstructs it, does not protect the constitution, but protects the government and thus constitutes a clear, unconstitutional fact. Such blatant and obvious violations of the principles of democracy and the rule of law cannot and must not leave this House uncommented or unchallenged. I therefore request, on behalf of the ID Group, a corresponding extension of the agenda for a debate and a Commission opinion on this for Tuesday afternoon, with a corresponding extension of the meeting on Tuesday.

Mr President! Protecting women from sexual harassment – absolute consent. This initiative Plus will not contribute to this. In the spirit of the continued mass import of a colorful, tolerant, diverse, but above all misogynistic multicultural culture, the workplace is being targeted as a place of horror for women. Far from it! In the outdoor pools, on public streets, squares, on buses and trains, women are sexually harassed, groped, raped and desecrated in the worst possible way. No wonder, because these are the places where the protection-seeking gold pieces romp around the dear long day to pursue their women-deprecating day-to-day business. You want to protect women? Then finally close the borders, stop the mass import of this brutal and raw sexual violence against women. If this is done, then we can talk about whether the invitation to a coffee at the workplace is actually sexual harassment or not just politeness among colleagues.

Madam President, Yes, the Istanbul Convention – again. A tool that should actually be available to combat violence against women. What was intended as a politically correct and important signal against domestic violence or violence against women turns out once again to be a mere hanger for another fantastic commercial for a whole potpourri of ideological nonsense from the house of this sham democracy. The fact that the EU does not even shy away from instrumentalising the alleged fight against violence against women in order to curtail the state sovereignty of the Member States is hardly worth the excitement. Early on, it is precisely what a dictatorial EU superstate wants to become. But instrumentalizing violence against women to implement ideological absurdities can only be understood by those victims of domestic violence as the very slap in the face that this House claims to be fighting. Unfortunately, the perpetrators – usually imported would-be machos – do not leave their misogynistic views as easily at the borders as their passports. This really cruel violence against women in Europe could be prevented so easily. A significant contribution would already be made if only the illegal crossing of the border of millions of young men, who are violently afflicted by an archaic image of women, were prevented. Securing one's own territory was until recently the natural right of every sovereign state. Of course, this house does not come up with such an idea. No, the most effective possible protection of women from violence unfortunately has to lag behind the tolerance-drunkness of the world improvers gathered here. But, dear women, next year too, this European Parliament will once again present to you in celebrated speeches of concern how it does not intend to protect you.

Madam President, The EU Global Health Strategy is summarised in a few sentences: Throw billions of taxpayer dollars in profits in the throat for a useless, harmful, even deadly product. Pass on the cost of the damage caused by the death injections to the taxpayer. Empower the President of the Commission to personally enrich her own husband in the performance of her duties. Transfer the power of government to the WHO and thus incapacitate the peoples constituting democracies. Sell all this for the good of the people, stigmatize, insult, ridicule and ostracize all those who see it differently. This is not about health, ladies and gentlemen, but about wresting popular rule from the sovereign peoples of Europe. The last three years have shown: The interests of the EU, the WHO and Big Pharma Public health is just as important as the arms industry's interest in world peace, not at all.

Mr President! The European Parliament is once again inciting everything and everyone against each other, in the spirit of ‘divide and rule’. In order to be able to demand a gender-equal salary, everyone should now know what their colleagues deserve. Thus, arrogance and arrogance on the one hand, envy, resentment and discord on the other hand, will determine the working atmosphere in the future. If there are no male colleagues to whose salary one could demand adjustment, then one fabricates imaginary male colleagues and demands salary adjustment to their imaginary salary. If, despite intensive searches, there is no actual salary discrimination, then the mere existence of a theoretical possibility of salary discrimination is sufficient to be able to assert equality claims. Her obsession with gender equality is taking on such delusional traits that I have to ask myself seriously by now: Who puts their shoes on every morning?

Madam President, Criminals exploit poverty in developing countries to bring children into the EU as human commodities, often for the purpose of sexual exploitation or organ trafficking. Adoption regulations must aim at finding genuinely caring adoptive parents for these children, closing legal loopholes to prevent the disappearance of thousands of children in the EU. Protecting children from pedophiles and sexual exploitation – that and only that can and must be their goal. However, if it were the attempt to secure the supply of children to the Rainbow Mafia, then the final proof of the abysmal malice of this house would be provided.

Madam President, These activists – I would call them fanatics – do not defend victims of human trafficking, women at risk of genital mutilation, rape victims, victims of domestic violence or children who are abused. On the contrary: As lobbyists in the abortion industry, they deny millions of unborn children the most comprehensive human right ever: The right to life. And one more thing: Anyone who makes abortion a socially accepted contraceptive after the act refuses women to be fundamentally responsible decision-makers. That, ladies and gentlemen, is misogyny. par excellence. You should be a little ashamed. And, by the way, I am speaking in front of exactly 19 deputies out of 705. We should also be ashamed of that.

Mr President! How does this House feel about democracy? Well, in a Member State as unpopular here as Hungary or Poland, if someone at a university is approached with the wrong pronoun, then one falls into snapshot here, and a huge debate takes place. If, on the other hand, there is systematic repression of the political opposition in a Member State, there is great silence here, if not secretly cheering. At the AfD party conference in Hesse, the hallmarks of all participants were documented and published on the Internet on the far-left platform Indymedia. On the basis of this information, more than a dozen vehicles were damaged by party colleagues in a hotel parking lot the following night. At the AfD party conference in Baden-Württemberg, left-wing protesters escalated in such a way that 53 police officers were injured. The political struggle in Germany has long since reached a new dimension. It is not used with arguments, but with violence against the opposition. There is open political persecution. Meanwhile, 50% of all violent attacks on the political parties are directed against the AfD. Whoever defends democracy only where it suits him, and not wherever it is necessary, everything is different, but not a democrat.

Madam President, I had drafted an opinion for the FEMM Committee on this report. I stressed the importance of equality between men and women. I condemned all violence against women and found that this violence had increased dramatically, especially during the COVID-19 lockdown. I called for vigorous action against the suffering of women who had been victims of human trafficking and sexual exploitation. But instead of taking a stand on these essential fundamental problems, this report has been reinterpreted as a true potpourri of ideological nonsense: Abortion, climate change, gender insanity. What you call the defence of democracy is ideological nonsense that you intend to impose on European peoples by abolishing democratic principles. I say yes to freedom, democracy and the rule of law and therefore clearly no to this report.

Madam President, here you all go again. In shock about Iran this time. All the while, carefully avoiding to call the devil by its name. Masha did not die because of some fundamentalists abusing Islam. Masha died because she would not subdue to Islam. There is no such thing as Islamism. It is Islam, point blank. And now go ahead, call me Islamophobe all you want. Heck, have them issue a fatwa against me and see if I care. The truth is, I am not afraid of Islam. The Islam apologists, the one patronising Islam, calling it the religion of peace, even. They are the ones afraid of Islam. Again, I am not afraid of Islam. I do, however, strongly object to this misogynistic, misanthropic and totalitarian ideology. And if you truly cared about freedom, democracy and the rule of law, you would stop your bigotry and for once have the guts to acknowledge the true problem. It is called Islam.

Madam President, Binding quotas for women in the top floors: Vocational qualifications were yesterday – the right gender is today. After years of fighting for equality to give no importance to gender, and it didn't matter whether man or woman, we now raise gender again to the all-important criterion. This is not progress, this is regression – regression to a Marxist ideological, better world in which an elite authority curtails individual freedom in favour of the supposed needs of the collective. World improvement fanatics who believe they have to force people to their happiness do not create happy people. They create oppressed people – and a world where people are oppressed is not a better world; It is an authoritarian, dictatorial world. I don't want that, and I hope you don't either.