18
Oct
2023
Watch
A true geopolitical Europe now (topical debate)
Madam President, Mr High Representative, Mr President-in-Office of the Council, building a geopolitical Europe has been one of the main objectives of this Commission. An unavoidable goal if we want to be heard and respected internationally. But we must ask ourselves if we are achieving this goal. And I wonder – with the exception, of course, of the response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, where, fundamentally, it did seem that a resolute Europe was emerging – where geopolitical Europe was in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. We responded late and badly. Where is geopolitical Europe when we sign migration agreements with countries like Tunisia, when neither the content nor the method are shared by all Member States? Where has geopolitical Europe been during the early days of the terrible conflict between Hamas and Israel? Doing politics on Twitter? Making contradictory and non-aligned decisions between institutions? It is not possible to build a geopolitical Europe if we are unable to agree on our strategic objectives and priorities for external action, if states' agendas take precedence over the European interest. It is not possible to do so if we are unable to convey clear and coordinated messages and if we continue to have dysfunctional decision-making mechanisms in the field of foreign policy, the famous unanimity. And the truth is that, while Europe's relative weight in the world economy declines and while alternative polarities to the Western world are being built with force, no one today thinks of Europe as a leading geopolitical actor. We need to develop the project of a Europe with strategic sovereignty on key issues such as industry, trade, technology... More Europe also in defence. And we must be clear that, indeed, being geopolitical implies having a minimum of hard power, but the added value that Europe brings on the international stage must always be the defence of human rights, democracy and international law.