Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Relazione 2025 della Commissione sul Kosovo

Riho Terras – Proposta di risoluzione (insieme del testo)
Data: 17.06.2026·Riferimento: A10-0166/2026
Relatore: Riho Terras

Risultato complessivo

Approvata
  • 412 A favore
  • 174 Contro
  • 58 Astensione
  • 75 Non ha votato
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Plenaria · (156 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.

Svolgimento della procedura

2025/2252(INI) · INI

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Deferimento78 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Esame in commissione96 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Ultimo documentato: Plenaria156 giorni dall’inizio di questa fase
Attività documentate (10)
  1. Deferimento alla commissione
  2. Relazione della commissione presentata
  3. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  4. Relazione della commissione approvata
  5. Presentazione in plenaria
  6. Presentazione in plenaria
  7. Presentazione in plenaria
  8. Discussione in plenaria
  9. Votazione in plenaria
  10. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • EU accession application of Kosovo from 2022 confirmed.
  • Demand for reform progress in rule of law and corruption control.
  • Emphasis on normalization of relations with Serbia as EU accession prerequisite.
Fonte: riassunto generato da IA con Mistral

Cronologia degli emendamenti (3)

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.

  1. Emendamento 2Respinta

    Paragraph 63 a (new)

    Presentato da Stanislav Stoyanov · ESN

    Aggiunto: 63a. Notes the implementation gaps affecting strategic east-west connectivity across the region, thus limiting the real gains for the EU; invites Kosovo to propose concrete timelines and monitoring, including under the Reform and Growth Facility, for the implementation of the expanded trans-European transport network (TEN-T);

  2. Emendamento 3Respinta

    Paragraph 2

    Presentato da Matthieu Valet, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux · PfE

    2. Rimosso: Reiterates its firm belief that Kosovo’s future lies in the EU, especially given the current geopolitical dynamics in the region, rapid major shifts in world politics and growing competition with authoritarian regimes; stresses that the rapprochement between Kosovo and the EU is part of a gradual integration process that goes beyond formal accession alone; stresses that tangible forms of cooperation and gradual integration, including sectoral partnerships, participation in EU programmes such as Erasmus+ and inclusion in certain EU policies, are vital levers for strengthening the ties with Kosovo; emphasises that these instruments help to consolidate Kosovo’s attachment to Europe and address the geostrategic challenges in the region, including by preventing the influence of external actors, without presupposing the speed or outcome of the enlargement process; Aggiunto: Considers that Kosovo does not meet the standards for EU membership, as it is notably plagued by corruption and organised crime, and that its gradual integration, as promoted by the EU, undermines the interests of European citizens;

  3. Emendamento 4Respinta

    Paragraph 6

    Presentato da Matthieu Valet, Pierre-Romain Thionnet, Julie Rechagneux · PfE

    6. Rimosso: Supports Kosovo’s application for EU membership, submitted in December 2022; reiterates its call on the Member States within the Council to invite the Commission to present its questionnaire without undue delay and to submit its opinion on the merits of the country’s application for membership and call on the Council to act swiftly thereafter, including by granting candidate status once the relevant criteria are fulfilled; calls on the five Member States that have not yet recognised Kosovo’s independence to do so without delay to enable it to advance on an equal footing with other candidates; recalls the ICJ advisory opinion of 22 July 2010, which states that the unilateral declaration of independence of Kosovo does not violate general international law; Aggiunto: Stresses that the non-recognition of Kosovo by five EU Member States constitutes a major obstacle to Kosovo’s EU accession process; underlines that the right to recognise an entity as a state, in terms of international law, is a fundamental element of state sovereignty; firmly rejects the pressure exerted by the EU on these five Member States;

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 719

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
PoloniaEPP
A favore
Paesi BassiRenew
A favore
ItaliaECR
A favore
PortogalloEPP
A favore
PoloniaEPP
A favore
AustriaS&D
A favore
SpagnaS&D
A favore
GermaniaS&D
A favore
PoloniaEPP
A favore
BulgariaRenew
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en