Votazione al Parlamento europeo
Adeguamento dei dazi doganali all'importazione di determinate merci originarie degli Stati Uniti d'America e apertura di contingenti tariffari per le importazioni di determinate merci originarie degli Stati Uniti d'America
Risultato complessivo
Approvata- 440 A favore
- 151 Contro
- 50 Astensione
- 78 Non ha votato
Come contiamo
- I voti Favorevoli, Contrari e Astensione provengono dal verbale di votazione nominale del Parlamento europeo.
- «Non ha votato» è derivato: deputati con mandato nel giorno della votazione per i quali non è stato registrato alcun voto. Le astensioni non contano per questo.
- Le successive correzioni di voto vengono mostrate ma non modificano il risultato ufficiale.
- Ogni votazione (votazione globale, emendamento, votazione parziale) conta separatamente. Per questo i totali possono differire da pagine che contano in modo diverso.
Stato e procedura
Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.
- Votazione del
- Ultima fase documentata
- Gazzetta ufficiale · (136 giorni fa)
- Prossima fase prevista
- Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
- Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale documentata
Svolgimento della procedura
2025/0261(COD) · COD
Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.
- Documentato: Deferimento
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Documentato: Plenaria
- Documentato: Negoziati
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Documentato: Plenaria
- Documentato: Firma
- Ultimo documentato: Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività documentate (31)
- Deferimento alla commissione
- Relazione della commissione presentata
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Relazione della commissione approvata
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Testo emendato in plenaria
- Rinvio in commissione per negoziati interistituzionali
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
- Negoziati interistituzionali
- Negoziati interistituzionali
- Negoziati interistituzionali
- Accordo provvisorio approvato in commissione
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Discussione in plenaria
- Posizione del Parlamento in prima lettura
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
- Firma
- Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:
Fonti
Dati: EP Open Data API
Di cosa si tratta?
- Tariff reductions for US goods in response to US trade measures.
- Safeguard clauses in case of violations of the Joint Declaration.
- Evaluation after six months and before expiry of validity.
Cronologia degli emendamenti (14)
Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.
Recital 1 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (1 a) The European Union expresses deep concern at the worrying increase in executions and death sentences in the United States; recalls that the abolition of the death penalty is a fundamental value of the Union, enshrined in Article 2 TEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights; considers that pursuing or concluding agreements in such a context is incompatible with the Union’s values and undermines the credibility of its external action.
Recital 1 b (new)
Presentato da Marina Mesure, Manon Aubry, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (1 b) The European Union recalls that the Union’s external action must be guided by the principles of sovereignty, the rule of law and respect for its institutional framework, in accordance with Articles 2 and 21 TEU; strongly condemns the imposition of sanctions, including travel bans, by the United States against a former European Commissioner for the implementation of EU legislation; considers that such measures constitute an unacceptable form of external pressure on the Union’s regulatory sovereignty and democratic decision-making; takes the view that, in this context, no agreement with the United States should be concluded.
Recital 1 c (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (1 c) The recent conduct of the United States administration, marked by multiple violations of international law, including serious threats to the territorial integrity of allied countries, military aggression against Iran, the US’s responsibility for the deaths of many civilians, including the bombing of a girls’ school, hostility towards international justice and deliberate efforts to weaken Europe, shows that the United States can no longer be regarded as a fully reliable and democratic partner for the European Union.
Recital 2 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (2 a) The trade agreement announced on 27 July 2025 was concluded in an informal, private setting – a golf course in Scotland owned by the President of the United States – not covered by any institutional procedure provided for by the Treaties of the European Union. Holding discussions that are decisive for European trade and agriculture policy in a private venue linked to one of the parties raises serious doubts about the transparency, democratic accountability and integrity of the decision-making process. Such a framework is incompatible with the requirements of diligence, independence and neutrality that is required to govern the conduct of the common commercial policy in accordance with Article 207 TFEU.
Recital 2 b (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (2 b) The United States chose not to participate in COP30 in Belém, demonstrating a lack of commitment to international climate governance. Further opening up the European market to American agricultural products without environmental conditions is therefore incompatible with the Union’s climate objectives.
Recital 2 c (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (2 c) The United States is not a party to the Paris Agreement under the UNFCCC after its withdrawal from the Agreement has been notified. In this case, no agreement could be initiated until the United States has rejoined the Paris Agreement and confirmed its commitment to implement its nationally determined contributions.
Recital 2 d (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (2 d) The European Union considers that no trade or political agreement with a third country can be concluded or even envisaged where that partner challenges or threatens the sovereignty and territorial integrity of a Member State or an associated territory; the Union cannot accept any commitments with a partner adopting such positions, notably with regard to Greenland.
Recital 2 e (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (2 e) This Regulation exempts United States industrial products imported to the Union from tariffs and grants further market access to United States agricultural products while Union products will be subject to a 15 % tariff rate, thereby creating systemic unfair terms of trade to the expense of the Union.
Recital 3 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (3 a) The European Union regrets that the so-called “Turnberry” political agreement contains unprecedented concessions, particularly in the areas of energy, investment, and industrial cooperation, and does not appear to have any legal basis on an explicit, precise, and up-to-date mandate of negotiation, in accordance with Article 207 of the TFEU.
Recital 4 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (4 a) United States agriculture continues to make extensive use of active substances that are banned in the European Union, and the proposed agreement thus creates structural unfair competition between European producers who adhere to a more sustainable and virtuous model and United States imports produced under lax standards, generating an increased risk to the health of European consumers. There is therefore concern about the European Commission’s future responsibility for diseases linked to these imports and their consumption by European citizens.
Recital 4 b (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Aggiunto: (4 b) The European Union stresses that the United States is one of the European Union’s main competitors in the agricultural sector, with significant differences in production standards, regulatory frameworks and cost structures; considers that this agreement undermines Union standards and the sustainability of the European agricultural model, to the exclusive benefit of the United States. It undermines European food sovereignty, is contrary to CAP objectives and creates a major tariff imbalance without adequate and robust safeguards.
Recital 9 a (new)
Presentato da Per Clausen · The Left
Aggiunto: (9 a) Whereas this agreement should not take effect for as long as the Trump-administration does not swear off the prospect of annexing or otherwise taking over Greenland, or in any other way threatens the territorial integrity of any Member State of the Union.
Recital 9 b (new)
Presentato da Per Clausen · The Left
Aggiunto: (9 b) Whereas any threats from the United States side, whether made formally, in speeches or via social media posts from members of the United States administration, made against any Union Member State should lead to the immediate suspension of this agreement.
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
Presentato da Per Clausen · The Left
Aggiunto: (d a) where the United States administration makes any claims to Greenland, threatens to annex Greenland, sends unannounced military forces, or is suspected, by the authorities in Greenland, Denmark or any other EU country, of launching any influence operations in Greenland.
Voto per gruppo politico
Come hanno votato i gruppi politici
- 56A favore
- 11Contro
- 1Astensione
- 9Non ha votato
- 166A favore
- 1Contro
- 1Astensione
- 17Non ha votato
- 109A favore
- 14Contro
- 0Astensione
- 13Non ha votato
- 68A favore
- 3Contro
- 1Astensione
- 9Non ha votato
- 22A favore
- 20Contro
- 3Astensione
- 8Non ha votato
- 13A favore
- 43Contro
- 22Astensione
- 7Non ha votato
- 6A favore
- 18Contro
- 2Astensione
- 4Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 39Contro
- 0Astensione
- 6Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 2Contro
- 20Astensione
- 5Non ha votato
Membri
Visualizzati 10 di 719
| Nome | Paese | Gruppo | Posizione di voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore |