Votazione al Parlamento europeo
Il piano pluriennale per il Mar Baltico e le vie da percorrere
Risultato complessivo
Approvata- 337 A favore
- 178 Contro
- 44 Astensione
- 158 Non ha votato
Come contiamo
- I voti Favorevoli, Contrari e Astensione provengono dal verbale di votazione nominale del Parlamento europeo.
- «Non ha votato» è derivato: deputati con mandato nel giorno della votazione per i quali non è stato registrato alcun voto. Le astensioni non contano per questo.
- Le successive correzioni di voto vengono mostrate ma non modificano il risultato ufficiale.
- Ogni votazione (votazione globale, emendamento, votazione parziale) conta separatamente. Per questo i totali possono differire da pagine che contano in modo diverso.
Stato e procedura
Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.
- Votazione del
- Ultima fase documentata
- Plenaria · (204 giorni fa)
- Prossima fase prevista
- Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
Svolgimento della procedura
2024/2127(INI) · INI
Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.
- Documentato: Deferimento
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Ultimo documentato: Plenaria
Attività documentate (17)
- Deferimento alla commissione
- Relazione della commissione presentata
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Relazione della commissione approvata
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:
Fonti
Dati: EP Open Data API
Di cosa si tratta?
- Criticism of Baltic Sea multiannual plan for failing targets by 2020
- Demand for science-based quota setting from 2026
- Support for small-scale coastal fisheries and local value creation
Cronologia degli emendamenti (19)
Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.
- Emendamento 1Respinta
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Presentato da Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau · The Left
Aggiunto: 36a. Highlights the recent case of the stranded humpback whale, ‘Timmy’; notes that an extensive rescue operation had to rely on private donations and that measures were mostly taken on ad hoc basis; encourages the Commission and the Member States to establish a coordinated emergency response and funding mechanism for whale and dolphin strandings;
- Emendamento 2Respinta
Paragraph 36 b (new)
Presentato da Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau · The Left
Aggiunto: 36b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to fully uphold and where necessary strengthen measures to protect marine mammals against negative impacts;
- Emendamento 3Respinta
Paragraph 36 c (new)
Presentato da Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau · The Left
Aggiunto: 36c. Highlights the fact that seabirds are prone to becoming entangled in various types of static nets and that, according to the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission, seabird bycatch numbers are often significantly higher than those reported in official reports; calls on the Commission and the Member States to fully uphold and where necessary strengthen measures to protect seabirds against negative impacts;
- Emendamento 4Approvata
Paragraph 36 d (new)
Presentato da Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau · The Left
Aggiunto: 36d. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to closely monitor whether measures for the recovery of the critically endangered Baltic harbour porpoise are being effectively implemented and where necessary to take additional measures to avert the main threats to their survival;
- Emendamento 5Approvata
Paragraph 36 e (new)
Presentato da Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau · The Left
Aggiunto: 36e. Recalls that Baltic seal populations were brought to the brink of extinction in the 1970s; points out that environmental and anthropogenic factors still pose a risk to the long-term survival of Baltic seal populations, despite their partial recovery; calls on the Commission and the Member States to uphold seal protection measures;
- Emendamento 5Respinta
Paragraph 36 e (new)
Presentato da Anja Hazekamp, Sebastian Everding, Emma Fourreau · The Left
Aggiunto: 36e. Recalls that Baltic seal populations were brought to the brink of extinction in the 1970s; points out that environmental and anthropogenic factors still pose a risk to the long-term survival of Baltic seal populations, despite their partial recovery; calls on the Commission and the Member States to uphold seal protection measures;
- Emendamento 6Respinta
Recital Y
Presentato da Sarah Knafo · ESN
… caught as ‘bycatch’, from environmental contaminants, prey depletion and disturbance from underwater
Rimosso: noise;Aggiunto: noise, including impulsive noise generated during the construction of offshore wind farms, which, according to the ICES workshop on the impacts of offshore renewable energy on fisheries and marine ecosystems, has the potential to cause irreversible damage to this critically endangered population and could contribute to its extinction; 19 https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Red-List-II-species-2025.pdf. - Emendamento 7Respinta
Recital AY
Presentato da Sarah Knafo · ESN
… pressures are transboundary and cumulative in nature and therefore require coordinated action
Rimosso: at international and EU level; whereas transitioning to low-impact and low-carbon economic activitiesAggiunto: among Member States, supported, where appropriate, by the Union within its existing competences; whereas technological innovation and industrial progress can contribute to climate change mitigation and adaptation; - Emendamento 12Approvata
Paragraph 43
Presentato da Niclas Herbst · PPE
… stresses the potential harm to marine ecosystems, local fisheries and human health; Aggiunto: further notes concerns that Russian fishery products continue to reach the EU market through existing trade channels, highlighting the need to ensure the effective closure of any loopholes that may undermine the objectives of EU restrictive measures; calls on the Commission to explore further measures to combat Russia’s shadow …
- Emendamento 13Approvata
Recital A
Presentato da Piotr Müller, Stephen Nikola Bartulica · ECR
… a context of increasing environmental pressures on the Baltic Sea ecosystem, has
Rimosso: not delivered on its overarching ecological and socio-economic objectives; whereas it has not achieved the restoration and maintenance of populations of harvested species above levels which can produce theAggiunto: helped maintain fishing pressure in line with maximum sustainable yieldRimosso: (MSY), despite its 2020 legal deadline, and has not contributed sufficiently to resolving particularly complex stock situations such as those of the eastern and western Baltic cod stocks, nor has it consistently supported the effective implementation of the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management, or implemented the precautionary approach,Aggiunto: (MSY) levels; whereas, despite significant fishing effort reductions in the past few years, some fish stocks have deteriorated due to a combination of pressures beyond fishing activity, including eutrophication, offshore energy, predator impacts, pollution, habitat degradation and climate-driven ecosystem changes, resulting in significant socio-economicRimosso: challenges for parts ofAggiunto: consequences for the fisheries sector; - Emendamento 25Respinta
Paragraph 3
Presentato da Piotr Müller, Stephen Nikola Bartulica · ECR
3. Urges the Commission and
Rimosso: the Member States when implementing the Baltic MAP Regulation to move to a recovery and rebuilding phase for fish stocks, taking measures and actions based on the best available scientific advice, as well as taking other potential interlinked actions related to other EU or national legislation to address all stressors on fish stocks; calls on the Commission and the Member States, when implementing the above-mentionned recovery and rebuilding phase, to consider remedial measures based on the best available science such as suspending targeted fisheries for some stocksAggiunto: Member States to commit to a comprehensive and cross-sectoral plan that addresses all major stressors in the Baltic SeaRimosso: as provided for in the MAP, avoidingAggiunto: – including nutrient pollution, chemical contaminants, offshore energy, climate change and predator impacts – while ensuring inclusive governance and maritime spatial planning that involves the fisheries sector; emphasises that these pressures are transboundary and cumulative, requiring EU-level coordination and the avoidance of measures that could undermine the socio-economic stability of coastalRimosso: communities so as to ensure that fishing activities for human consumption remain sustainable;Aggiunto: communities; - Emendamento 27Respinta
Paragraph 6
Presentato da Piotr Müller, Stephen Nikola Bartulica · ECR
6. Calls
Rimosso: on the Council to adopt TACs that are fully aligned with the precautionary approach, taking into account the vulnerability of the Baltic Sea ecosystem, socio-economic factors, and the slow recovery rates of stocks as well as the scientific uncertainty of advice; callson the Commission to carefully consider socio-economic aspects when evaluating the current … - Emendamento 29Respinta
Paragraph 8
Presentato da Piotr Müller, Stephen Nikola Bartulica · ECR
Rimosso: 8. Calls on the Member States and the Commission, taking into account the shortcomings of the Baltic MAP Regulation in terms of reaching its ecological and socio-economic objectives, to consider launching measures in accordance with Articles 12 and 13 of the CFP whenever best available scientific advice indicates the need for such measures, and to prepare action by analysing the costs and benefits of closing relevant fisheries, including for recreational fisheries, noting lost revenues, livelihoods, food security and the future cost of inaction;Aggiunto: deleted - Emendamento 30Respinta
Paragraph 9
Presentato da Piotr Müller, Stephen Nikola Bartulica · ECR
Rimosso: 9. Calls for the prevention of irreversible ecological damage to herring and sprat populations in the Baltic Sea in order to secure the long-term viability of coastal and small-scale fisheries targeting those species and safeguarding marine food webs; believes that, based on scientific advice, recovery pauses for the respective stocks must be urgently considered, until scientific evidence demonstrates a clear and sustained recovery of the stocks;Aggiunto: deleted - Emendamento 34Respinta
Paragraph 18
Presentato da Piotr Müller, Stephen Nikola Bartulica · ECR
Rimosso: 18. Calls on the Member States to ensure the full and effective implementation of the EU fisheries control regulation, including provisions addressing misreporting of catches and strengthening the accuracy and reliability of catch reporting in the region;Aggiunto: deleted - Emendamento 35Respinta
Paragraph 21
Presentato da Piotr Müller, Stephen Nikola Bartulica · ECR
… that MSY remains an important tool for adaptive and responsible management; calls Aggiunto: on the Commission and the Member States to apply the upper ranges within FMSY (fishing mortality consistent with achieving MSY) when setting TACs for Baltic Sea stocks wherever the best available scientific advice permits, in order to give effect to the balanced objectives of Article 2 CFP, protect employment and processing capacity, uphold EU food security and reduce dependence on fish imports; calls furthermore on the Commission to request from STECF relevant socio-economic analyses for …
- Emendamento 36Respinta
Paragraph 22
Presentato da Piotr Müller, Stephen Nikola Bartulica · ECR
… Commission to base all stock assessments used for implementing EU law on
Rimosso: BMSY biomass reference points, asAggiunto: FMSY, as this is reflected in the objectives of Article 3(1) of the Baltic MAP Regulation … - Emendamento 42Respinta
Paragraph 55
Presentato da Piotr Müller, Stephen Nikola Bartulica · ECR
Rimosso: 55. Notes that some Member States in the Baltic Sea region such as Germany and Sweden have introduced national measures to restrict or prohibit bottom trawling in certain marine areas;Aggiunto: deleted - Emendamento 43Respinta
Paragraph 56
Presentato da Piotr Müller, Stephen Nikola Bartulica · ECR
56.
Rimosso: Calls on the Commission and the Member States for the Baltic Sea to propose halting trawling for fish meal and fish oil during a rebuilding phase, and limiting extractive activities in MPAs; recognises that approaches differ across the Union in the light of specific ecological, legal and socio-economic contexts; encouragesAggiunto: Encourages the Member States to continue developing proportionate, science-based solutions in cooperation with …
Voto per gruppo politico
Come hanno votato i gruppi politici
- 65A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 12Non ha votato
- 97A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 39Non ha votato
- 43A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 10Non ha votato
- 100A favore
- 12Contro
- 18Astensione
- 53Non ha votato
- 20A favore
- 9Contro
- 8Astensione
- 8Non ha votato
- 8A favore
- 7Contro
- 5Astensione
- 10Non ha votato
- 4A favore
- 53Contro
- 9Astensione
- 15Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 76Contro
- 1Astensione
- 8Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 21Contro
- 3Astensione
- 3Non ha votato
Membri
Visualizzati 10 di 717
| Nome | Paese | Gruppo | Posizione di voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore |