Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Accordo rafforzato di partenariato e di cooperazione tra l'Unione europea, da una parte, e la Repubblica dell'Uzbekistan, dall'altra

Ilhan Kyuchyuk – Proposta di risoluzione (insieme del testo)
Data: 20.05.2026·Riferimento: A10-0107/2026
Relatore: Ilhan Kyuchyuk

Risultato complessivo

Approvata
  • 423 A favore
  • 16 Contro
  • 208 Astensione
  • 70 Non ha votato
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Altre attività · (177 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.

Svolgimento della procedura

2024/0260(NLE) · NLE

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Deferimento50 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Esame in commissione97 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Documentato: Plenaria30 giorni alla fase successiva
  4. Ultimo documentato: Altre attività177 giorni dall’inizio di questa fase
Attività documentate (8)
  1. Deferimento alla commissione
  2. Relazione della commissione presentata
  3. Relazione della commissione approvata
  4. Presentazione in plenaria
  5. Discussione in plenaria
  6. Altra attività documentata
  7. Votazione in plenaria
  8. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • Approval of the EPCA agreement between EU and Uzbekistan.
  • Demand for human rights reforms and democratic opening.
  • Emphasis on strategic partnership in Central Asia.
Fonte: riassunto generato da IA con Mistral

Cronologia degli emendamenti (8)

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.

  1. Emendamento 1Approvata

    Paragraph 37 a (new)

    Presentato da Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Claudiu Manda · S&D

    Aggiunto: 37a. Is concerned about the growing evidence that Uzbekistan has weaponised international and regional legal cooperation mechanisms for transnational repression against activists, journalists, human rights defenders and trial monitors; notes that this includes misuse of INTERPOL notices and diffusions, mutual legal assistance requests, and cooperation on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism to pursue politically motivated extradition, detention or forcible return of individuals; calls on Uzbekistan to fully respect the principle of non-refoulement;

  2. Emendamento 4Respinta

    Recital I a (new)

    Presentato da Sarah Knafo · ESN

    Aggiunto: Ia. whereas the European Union should not use its taxpayers’ money to fund programmes in Uzbekistan based on ideological criteria;

  3. Emendamento 5Respinta

    Recital N

    Presentato da Stanislav Stoyanov, Alexander Sell, Tomasz Froelich · ESN

    … with the EU and 7.2 % of exports went to the EU; Aggiunto: whereas the EU Member States need to tap into this economic potential in order to increase the opportunities for European companies to access Uzbekistan’s market of 38.2 million consumers;

  4. Emendamento 8Respinta

    Paragraph 3

    Presentato da Alexander Sell, Tomasz Froelich · ESN

    3. Stresses that Parliament’s consent to the EPCA Rimosso: constitutes a strategic investment in the EU-Uzbekistan partnership and should be understood as a tool to foster long-term engagement, stability and cooperation, contributing to the EU’s broader strategy in Central Asia and to balanced international alignment; Aggiunto: must serve the concrete economic and security interests of the European Union and its Member States; emphasises that the EPCA should function as a framework for mutually advantageous cooperation; insists that any engagement must deliver measurable benefits to the EU Member States;

  5. Emendamento 9Respinta

    Paragraph 6 a (new)

    Presentato da Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell · ESN

    Aggiunto: 6a. Is worried that the EU risks being sidelined in a region where big powers compete for influence and resources; considers that energy and resource supply should be a key part of a strengthened partnership as this would bolster the EU’s energy security and strengthen its strategic position; calls, therefore, for the EU to set aside its political conditionality approach and follow a strategy that aims to facilitate investment in critical raw materials and renewable energy;

  6. Emendamento 14Respinta

    Paragraph 47 a (new)

    Presentato da Stanislav Stoyanov, Tomasz Froelich · ESN

    Aggiunto: 47a. Invites the Government of Uzbekistan to take advantage of the skills and competences acquired by the returning migrants while abroad and create job opportunities for them to avoid further brain drain and boost its own labour market;

  7. Emendamento 15Respinta

    Paragraph 49

    Presentato da Alexander Sell, Tomasz Froelich · ESN

    … EU-Uzbekistan memorandum of understanding launching a strategic partnership on critical raw materials; Rimosso: welcomes the EU-Central Asia declaration of intent on critical raw materials, endorsed at the first EU-Central Asia summit, which reflects the mutual interest in boosting cooperation on energy and the green transition; Aggiunto: underlines that Uzbekistan ranks among the world’s leading producers of uranium, gold, copper and rare earth elements critical to the EU’s energy security and industrial sovereignty; calls for this partnership to be operationalised through binding supply agreements, joint venture frameworks and priority access for EU companies; welcomes the introduction of an additional EUR 12 billion investment package during …

  8. Emendamento 16Respinta

    Paragraph 54

    Presentato da Alexander Sell, Tomasz Froelich · ESN

    54. Rimosso: Supports Aggiunto: Welcomes the strengthening of people-to-people contacts, student, academic, scientific, cultural and other professional exchanges, Rimosso: and mobility, notably in the fields of education, business and tourism; notes that the EPCA includes the possibility of negotiating a readmission Rimosso: agreement and an agreement on visa facilitation; invites both sides to take the steps necessary to meet the conditions for the launch of the negotiations; Aggiunto: agreement; rejects any visa facilitation arrangement that could lead to increased illegal migration or place additional burden on the EU’s asylum system;

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 717

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
SpagnaEPP
A favore
SveziaGreens/EFA
A favore
SveziaEPP
A favore
PoloniaEPP
A favore
BelgioEPP
A favore
PortogalloS&D
A favore
GermaniaGreens/EFA
A favore
DanimarcaGreens/EFA
A favore
GermaniaEPP
A favore
PortogalloS&D
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en