Votazione al Parlamento europeo
RELAZIONE sullo stato di previsione delle entrate e delle spese del Parlamento europeo per l'esercizio 2027
Data: 30.04.2026Riferimento: A10-0124/2026Risultato complessivo
Approvata- 401 A favore
- 116 Contro
- 68 Astensione
- 134 Non ha votato
Come contiamo
- I voti Favorevoli, Contrari e Astensione provengono dal verbale di votazione nominale del Parlamento europeo.
- «Non ha votato» è derivato: deputati con mandato nel giorno della votazione per i quali non è stato registrato alcun voto. Le astensioni non contano per questo.
- Le successive correzioni di voto vengono mostrate ma non modificano il risultato ufficiale.
- Ogni votazione (votazione globale, emendamento, votazione parziale) conta separatamente. Per questo i totali possono differire da pagine che contano in modo diverso.
Stato e procedura
Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.
- Votazione del
- Ultima fase documentata
- Plenaria · (200 giorni fa)
- Prossima fase prevista
- Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
Svolgimento della procedura
2025/2247(BUI) · BUI
Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Ultimo documentato: Plenaria
Attività documentate (6)
- Relazione della commissione presentata
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Relazione della commissione approvata
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
- Votazione in plenaria
Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:
Fonti
Dati: EP Open Data API
Di cosa si tratta?
- 2027 budget draft of the European Parliament adopted.
- €2.66 billion total budget with 1.98 % increase from 2026.
- Cybersecurity and digital sovereignty prioritized.
Cronologia degli emendamenti (11)
Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.
- Emendamento 1Approvata
Paragraph 28
Presentato da Maria Ohisalo, Cristina Guarda, Estelle Ceulemans +39 · Members
28.
Rimosso: TakesAggiunto: Expresses concern that the quality and continuity of services provided by Parliament’s Wayenberg Crèche have been affected by frequent changes of service providers since 2020, alongside challenges related to staff shortages, high staff absenteeism and staff turnover at the crèche; takes note of theRimosso: early terminationAggiunto: award of the current contract for Parliament’s childcare services in Brussels to a new company established shortly after the publication of the tender and reportedly linked to the former provider, Esedra; recalls the early termination by the Parliament of the contract with the previous provider of the CrècheRimosso: WayenbergAggiunto: Wayenberg, Esedra after a number of serious allegations againstRimosso: the formerAggiunto: that contractor; reiterates that decent working conditions Aggiunto: and adequate pay for external staff,Rimosso: such asAggiunto: including training, skills development, Aggiunto: measures against violence and harassment, meaningful social dialogue and investment in staff wellbeing should, where relevant, be a priority consideration in public procurement of Parliament as a matter of principle; Aggiunto: calls for an independent external audit of the tender procedure and of the implementation of the current contract, including an independent external assessment of working conditions and staff wellbeing; calls on the Bureau and the Secretary-General to reconsider the current outsourcing model for childcare services and to carry out a cost-benefit analysis of implementing the progressive internalisation of staff for pre-school childcare services, with a view to ensuring high-quality standards and long-term continuity of care. - Emendamento 1Respinta
Paragraph 28
Presentato da Maria Ohisalo, Cristina Guarda, Estelle Ceulemans +39 · Members
28.
Rimosso: TakesAggiunto: Expresses concern that the quality and continuity of services provided by Parliament’s Wayenberg Crèche have been affected by frequent changes of service providers since 2020, alongside challenges related to staff shortages, high staff absenteeism and staff turnover at the crèche; takes note of theRimosso: early terminationAggiunto: award of the current contract for Parliament’s childcare services in Brussels to a new company established shortly after the publication of the tender and reportedly linked to the former provider, Esedra; recalls the early termination by the Parliament of the contract with the previous provider of the CrècheRimosso: WayenbergAggiunto: Wayenberg, Esedra after a number of serious allegations againstRimosso: the formerAggiunto: that contractor; reiterates that decent working conditions Aggiunto: and adequate pay for external staff,Rimosso: such asAggiunto: including training, skills development, Aggiunto: measures against violence and harassment, meaningful social dialogue and investment in staff wellbeing should, where relevant, be a priority consideration in public procurement of Parliament as a matter of principle; Aggiunto: calls for an independent external audit of the tender procedure and of the implementation of the current contract, including an independent external assessment of working conditions and staff wellbeing; calls on the Bureau and the Secretary-General to reconsider the current outsourcing model for childcare services and to carry out a cost-benefit analysis of implementing the progressive internalisation of staff for pre-school childcare services, with a view to ensuring high-quality standards and long-term continuity of care. - Emendamento 2Respinta
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Presentato da Cristina Guarda, Maria Ohisalo, Estelle Ceulemans +39 · Members
Aggiunto: 28a. Emphasises the need to ensure that Parliament’s crèche complies with the highest food safety standards; underlines that scientific evidence over the last ten years shows that infants and children are disproportionately exposed to the harmful effects of pesticides on their health and development, due to their higher intake relative to body weight and their developing physiology, including risks of cognitive impairments and developmental delays1; calls for consideration of the need for public procurement rules to include a requirement for the provision of 100% organic food, prioritising short supply chains and local suppliers, in order to reduce pesticide exposure and better protect children’s health and development. 1. Jiang B, et al. (2024), The effects of organic food on human health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Nutr Rev., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37930102/; European Environment Agency (2024), How pesticides impact human health https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/how-pesticides-impact-human-health
- Emendamento 3Respinta
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: 3a. Recalls that the daily allowance is a flat-rate sum covering accommodation, meals and related expenses each day that a Member is present at the European Parliament on official business; stresses that Members must sign an attendance register in order to benefit from the allowance; notes that there are exemptions for the President and the chairs of political groups who automatically benefit from it independently of their presence unless they explicitly request it; calls on Parliament to put an end to the exceptions for the President and the chairs of political groups, who should sign an attendance register like all other Members to benefit from their per-diem;
- Emendamento 4Respinta
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marc Botenga · The Left
Aggiunto: 3b. Calls for an adjustment of the Statute for Members of the European Parliament to cut the basic monthly salaries of Members by 50 %.
- Emendamento 7Respinta
Paragraph 32 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Marc Botenga · The Left
Aggiunto: 32a. Calls for the dissolution of the optional pension scheme for Members;
- Emendamento 9Respinta
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Presentato da Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet +1 · PfE
Aggiunto: 8 a. Underlines that the current financial circumstances affecting the Union budget, including Parliament’s budget, should be resolved through increased fiscal responsibility in the form of enhanced efficiency in respect of already assigned funds at all levels of implementation, as opposed to the creation of new own resources or increase in GNI contributions; condemns ongoing Union strategies which aim at introducing new costs and taxes to consumers in order to cover the ever-increasing expenses of the Union’s many agencies, institutions, funds and finance schemes;
- Emendamento 10Respinta
Paragraph 16
Presentato da Julien Sanchez, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Angéline Furet +1 · PfE
Rimosso: 16.Takes note that the SPAAK building renovation starts to be carried out as of 2027; takesAggiunto: 16. Takes note that the overall budget for the renovation Aggiunto: of the Spaak building has been set at EUR 455 million and that EUR 77,67 million … to ensure strict cost control, transparency and adherence to the planned budget; Aggiunto: is sceptical that the renovation of a single, already fully functioning building, should cost close to EUR 0,5 billion; demands a reduction in the costs of this undertaking; demands full transparency and the tracking of all expenses related to this undertaking to ensure accountability for those responsible for potential financial irregularities; expresses concern at the absence of a detailed breakdown of costs for the planned renovation of the Spaak building, decided by the Bureau of the European Parliament; underlines that such a lack of transparency is particularly problematic for a project of this scale and raises concerns about possible cost overruns, especially in light of those observed in several previous European construction projects, such as Berlaymont, the Europa building, the Court of Justice, EMA, KAD II; - Emendamento 13Respinta
Paragraph 25
Presentato da Jorge Buxadé Villalba · PfE
25.
Rimosso: Takes note of the significant increases of theAggiunto: Underlines the significant increase in carbon credit prices which at current emission levels would need an estimated EUR 950 000 for 2027;Rimosso: calls on the administration to give priority toAggiunto: highlights that this cost reflects the ongoing surge in ETS prices, which are becoming unsurmountable for key sectors such as metallurgy and fertilizer production; remarks that the difficulties associated with decreasing Parliament’s emissionsRimosso: including by increased investments in clean heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, notably heat pump installations in Brussels and other proportionate and cost-effective measures to lower emissions where reasonable, over buying carbon credits; welcomes the introduction of an enhanced train offer for missions to Strasbourg as of June 2025, as a positive step towards reducing CO2 emissions;Aggiunto: are insignificant compared to the expenses and other realities involved in reducing emissions in sectors with hard to abate emissions; calls, in the context of the ETS revision during the third quarter of 2026, for in depth impact assessments of the effect of ETS and its relevant phase-out targets on key sectors, as well as the adjustment of said targets in order to safeguard key national industries; - Emendamento 15Approvata
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Presentato da Sandra Gómez López · S&D
Aggiunto: 27a. Welcomes the recent initiatives endorsed by the Conference of Presidents and the Bureau to allow Members in the perinatal period to vote by proxy, recognising this as a positive step towards greater inclusiveness in parliamentary work and calls on all parties to swiftly implement the measure; insists, however, that the measure falls short of Parliament’s repeated calls to ensure voting rights not just for Members in the perinatal period, but also for Members on parental or paternity leave or facing certified long-term illness;
- Emendamento 15Approvata
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Presentato da Sandra Gómez López · S&D
Aggiunto: 27a. Welcomes the recent initiatives endorsed by the Conference of Presidents and the Bureau to allow Members in the perinatal period to vote by proxy, recognising this as a positive step towards greater inclusiveness in parliamentary work and calls on all parties to swiftly implement the measure; insists, however, that the measure falls short of Parliament’s repeated calls to ensure voting rights not just for Members in the perinatal period, but also for Members on parental or paternity leave or facing certified long-term illness;
Voto per gruppo politico
Come hanno votato i gruppi politici
- 60A favore
- 0Contro
- 5Astensione
- 12Non ha votato
- 136A favore
- 1Contro
- 0Astensione
- 48Non ha votato
- 113A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 22Non ha votato
- 45A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 8Non ha votato
- 7A favore
- 13Contro
- 7Astensione
- 3Non ha votato
- 32A favore
- 9Contro
- 27Astensione
- 13Non ha votato
- 1A favore
- 68Contro
- 2Astensione
- 14Non ha votato
- 6A favore
- 2Contro
- 27Astensione
- 11Non ha votato
- 1A favore
- 23Contro
- 0Astensione
- 3Non ha votato
Membri
Visualizzati 10 di 719
| Nome | Paese | Gruppo | Posizione di voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore |