Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Attuazione della politica di sicurezza e di difesa comune – relazione annuale 2025

Thijs Reuten – § 19 – Emendamento 9
Data: 21.01.2026·Riferimento: A10-0265/2025
Relatore: Thijs Reuten

Risultato complessivo

Respinta
  • 66 A favore
  • 574 Contro
  • 17 Astensione
  • 62 Non ha votato
Emendamento— Stai visualizzando una votazione secondaria (emendamento) della votazione principale.Emendamento 9 · Presentato da The LeftVedi l'emendamento al PE ↗
Testo dell’emendamento

Presentato da Özlem Demirel, Marc Botenga, Irene Montero, Isabel Serra Sánchez, Danilo Della Valle, Estrella Galán

19. Reiterates its concern about Rimosso: Russia’s intensified militarisation and its aggressive posture towards the EU Member States, increased geopolitical, climate-change- Aggiunto: intensified militarisation of the Arctic region by Russia and Arctic NATO states, increased geopolitical, climate-change and resource-driven competition in the Arctic as well as Rimosso: malign activities in European territorial waters and exclusive economic zones, including through Aggiunto: environmentally harmful activities, including the activities of the Russian shadow fleet; Rimosso: is also concerned about increased Chinese presence and the deepened cooperation between Russia and China in the Arctic, including joint exercises; stresses that it is essential to counterbalance Russia and China’s growing influence and military presence Aggiunto: stresses the need to protect the fragile environment of the Arctic and underlines the importance of overall stability and peace in the region; Aggiunto: stresses that the EU should pursue policies that ensure the highest priority for protecting the Arctic region, which in turn is one of the principal global climate regulators and is a major source of income for the inhabitants of the region, underlining the need for knowledge- and science-based policy that involves local Arctic communities and knowledge institutions; points out that the Arctic states have on several occasions declared their commitment to and worked towards resolving possible conflicts of interest in accordance with the principles of international law; emphasises that, despite the differences between the Arctic and Antarctic, but also due to their similarities, the Antarctic Treaty creates a framework for peaceful research and cooperation without becoming entangled in territorial disputes; calls, in this regard, for work on a similar framework for peaceful research and cooperation in the Arctic context; underlines the importance of overall stability and peace in the Arctic in accordance with the principles of international law; Rimosso: calls for concrete and effective action by the EU and its Member States using all available means and maximum strategic creativity to stop the shadow fleet, enhance Arctic and maritime domain awareness through enhanced surveillance, intelligence sharing and satellite monitoring, and protect critical infrastructure; stresses the need for the EU to ensure the effective monitoring of its external maritime borders to prevent illegal activities; is concerned by non-EU countries’ interference in Greenland, notably inflammatory narratives and … well as the US Government’s formulation of explicit threats against Greenland’s sovereignty; Aggiunto: strongly condemns these repeated threats to the territorial integrity of Greenland by the US President and his administration, by their assertion of direct territorial claims against Greenland, including the threat of military force;

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese. PE782.001v01-00

← Torna alla votazione principale
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Plenaria · (336 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.

Svolgimento della procedura

2025/2165(INI) · INI

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Deferimento15 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Esame in commissione77 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Ultimo documentato: Plenaria336 giorni dall’inizio di questa fase
Attività documentate (17)
  1. Deferimento alla commissione
  2. Relazione della commissione presentata
  3. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  4. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  5. Relazione della commissione approvata
  6. Presentazione in plenaria
  7. Presentazione in plenaria
  8. Presentazione in plenaria
  9. Presentazione in plenaria
  10. Presentazione in plenaria
  11. Presentazione in plenaria
  12. Presentazione in plenaria
  13. Presentazione in plenaria
  14. Presentazione in plenaria
  15. Discussione in plenaria
  16. Votazione in plenaria
  17. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • The EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) is adapting to increasing hybrid threats, particularly from Russia and China, aiming to enhance military and civilian resilience.
  • Key measures include countering cyberattacks, disinformation, and sabotage of critical infrastructure while accelerating defence capabilities.
  • The report advocates for joint procurement initiatives like the Security Measures for Europe (SAFE) facility, backed by €150 billion, to strengthen industrial capacity.
  • Cooperation with NATO is prioritised, alongside sustained support for Ukraine as a cornerstone of European security.
  • The EU seeks greater strategic autonomy to reduce dependencies and improve collective defence readiness by 2030.
Fonte: relazione esplicativa (generata da IA)

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 719

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
FranciaGUE/NGL
A favore
ItaliaGUE/NGL
A favore
FranciaGUE/NGL
A favore
SlovacchiaNI
A favore
GermaniaNI
A favore
SlovacchiaNI
A favore
MaltaS&D
Intenzione di votoControVoto espresso: a favore
FranciaGUE/NGL
A favore
PoloniaESN
A favore
CechiaEPP
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en