Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Relazioni 2023 e 2024 della Commissione sull'Ucraina

Michael Gahler – Proposta di risoluzione (insieme del testo)
Data: 09.09.2025·Riferimento: A10-0154/2025
Relatore: Michael Gahler

Risultato complessivo

Approvata
  • 418 A favore
  • 135 Contro
  • 41 Astensione
  • 125 Non ha votato
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Plenaria · (477 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.

Svolgimento della procedura

2025/2026(INI) · INI

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Deferimento105 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Esame in commissione77 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Ultimo documentato: Plenaria477 giorni dall’inizio di questa fase
Attività documentate (18)
  1. Deferimento alla commissione
  2. Relazione della commissione presentata
  3. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  4. Relazione della commissione approvata
  5. Presentazione in plenaria
  6. Presentazione in plenaria
  7. Presentazione in plenaria
  8. Presentazione in plenaria
  9. Presentazione in plenaria
  10. Presentazione in plenaria
  11. Presentazione in plenaria
  12. Presentazione in plenaria
  13. Presentazione in plenaria
  14. Presentazione in plenaria
  15. Presentazione in plenaria
  16. Discussione in plenaria
  17. Votazione in plenaria
  18. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • I deputati ribadiscono l’impegno a supporto dell’indipendenza, della sovranità e dell’integrità territoriale dell’Ucraina
  • La Commissione europea dovrebbe aprire i capitoli negoziali per accelerare il processo di adesione dell’Ucraina
  • L’UE e i suoi Stati membri devono restare alleati strategici di Kyiv
Fonte: EP Press Room — 9 settembre 2025

Cronologia degli emendamenti (7)

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.

  1. Emendamento 1Respinta

    Recital AA a (new)

    Presentato da Danilo Della Valle · The Left

    Aggiunto: AAa. whereas there is a growing number of violations of fundamental rights documented in Ukraine, with activists, political opponents and journalists critical of the Ukrainian Government being repressed; whereas there have been arbitrary arrests, cases of judicial persecution and restrictions on freedom of the press and freedom of expression; whereas extraordinary laws are being used to silence dissent and permanently suppress even the slightest form of democratic pluralism; whereas it is becoming more and more common to see serious violations of personal freedoms during forced demonstrations on the country’s streets;

  2. Emendamento 3Approvata

    Recital W a (new)

    Presentato da Özlem Demirel, Jonas Sjöstedt · The Left

    Aggiunto: Wa. Whereas the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) has raised serious concerns regarding the deterioration of labour rights in Ukraine, including violations of trade union freedoms and social dialogue; whereas freedom of association, collective bargaining, and the right to strike are protected under International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions to which Ukraine is a party, and are key elements of the EU acquis and the Copenhagen criteria;

  3. Emendamento 4Approvata

    Paragraph 1 a (new)

    Presentato da Özlem Demirel · The Left

    Aggiunto: 1a. Regrets the EU’s militaristic strategy in Ukraine, which has failed to secure peace and undermined the EU’s global relevance; demands an urgent shift in EU policy toward diplomacy and civilian protection, putting peace and conflict resolution above military escalation; calls on the EU to finally open negotiation channels to achieve a political solution to the conflict in Ukraine, in response to the need for collective security and disarmament in Europe and compliance with the principles of the UN Charter and the Final Act of the Helsinki Conference;

  4. Emendamento 5Respinta

    Paragraph 45 a (new)

    Presentato da Özlem Demirel, Jonas Sjöstedt · The Left

    Aggiunto: 45a. Expresses deep concern about reports of state interference in trade union affairs, including attempts to seize union property and to delegitimise representative organisations; urges the Ukrainian government to refrain from any actions that threaten trade union independence and to guarantee full legal protection against anti-union practices; calls on the Ukrainian authorities to immediately lift all restrictions on trade union leader Grigoriy Osovyi and ensure that no trade unionist is subject to judicial harassment, arbitrary detention or state repression; urges the Commission and the EEAS to actively monitor the state of labour rights in Ukraine, in close cooperation with the ETUC and the ILO;

  5. Emendamento 6Respinta

    Paragraph 65 a (new)

    Presentato da Kinga Gál, António Tânger Corrêa, Georg Mayer +1 · PfE

    Aggiunto: 65a. Considers it unacceptable that Ukraine deliberately targeted the Druzhba oil pipeline, being fully aware of its indispensable role for the energy security of Hungary and Slovakia; states that these attacks do not primarily harm the Russian Federation, but rather undermine the security, welfare and economic stability of Hungary and Slovakia, members of the very community that Ukraine is eager to join; recalls that in its statement of 27 January 2025, the Commission stated that the ‘integrity of the energy infrastructure supplying EU Member States is a matter of EU security. The Commission expects all third countries to respect this and is ready to take measures to protect critical energy infrastructure such as electricity cables and oil and gas pipeline or facilities’; in this context, expresses grave concern regarding the continued silence and inaction of the Commission in the face of recent actions by Ukraine that deliberately threaten the energy infrastructure of Member States, notably Hungary and Slovakia; emphasises that the lack of meaningful response may be interpreted as the Commission’s alignment with a third country against its own Member States in a matter of national sovereignty and security; calls on the Commission to take immediate measures to protect critical energy infrastructure, in line with its aforementioned statement; urges the Commission to clarify its position on these attacks; stresses that Member States cannot be left vulnerable on account of political considerations;

  6. Emendamento 39Respinta

    Recital Q a (new)

    Presentato da Petar Volgin, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff +1 · ESN

    Aggiunto: Qa. whereas on 20 August 2024, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted a law targeting various religious organisations, including the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), the largest Christian denomination in Ukraine by number of parishes and clergy, and recognised by most practising Ukrainian believers; whereas this legislation, justified by the Ukrainian authorities on national security grounds owing to alleged links between the UOC and the Russian Federation, prompted serious concerns about its compatibility with fundamental human rights, notably the right to freedom of religion; whereas the adoption of this law has provoked significant public controversy and may risk deepening societal divisions in Ukraine;

  7. Emendamento 44Respinta

    Paragraph 43 a (new)

    Presentato da Petar Volgin, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff +1 · ESN

    Aggiunto: 43a. Strongly condemns the ongoing campaign of state pressure against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, including the detention and intimidation of clergy, closure of places of worship, and the adoption of legislation aimed at banning or severely restricting its activities; stresses that such targeted repression of a major religious community has no place in a country aspiring to join the EU; insists that Ukraine immediately cease discriminatory measures under the guise of national security and fully align its practices with international human rights obligations;

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 719

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
ItaliaECR
A favore
BelgioS&D
A favore
DanimarcaRenew
A favore
PoloniaECR
A favore
GermaniaNI
A favore
PoloniaECR
A favore
CechiaGreens/EFA
A favore
ItaliaECR
A favore
PortogalloEPP
A favore
FinlandiaEPP
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en