Votazione al Parlamento europeo
Vecchie sfide e nuove pratiche commerciali nel mercato interno
Risultato complessivo
Approvata- 306 A favore
- 80 Contro
- 57 Astensione
- 276 Non ha votato
Come contiamo
- I voti Favorevoli, Contrari e Astensione provengono dal verbale di votazione nominale del Parlamento europeo.
- «Non ha votato» è derivato: deputati con mandato nel giorno della votazione per i quali non è stato registrato alcun voto. Le astensioni non contano per questo.
- Le successive correzioni di voto vengono mostrate ma non modificano il risultato ufficiale.
- Ogni votazione (votazione globale, emendamento, votazione parziale) conta separatamente. Per questo i totali possono differire da pagine che contano in modo diverso.
Stato e procedura
Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.
- Votazione del
- Ultima fase documentata
- Plenaria · (556 giorni fa)
- Prossima fase prevista
- Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
Svolgimento della procedura
2025/2542(RSP) · RSP
Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.
- Ultimo documentato: Plenaria
Attività documentate (8)
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:
Fonti
Dati: EP Open Data API
Di cosa si tratta?
- Single market as core pillar of European integration.
- Focus on competitiveness amid geopolitical and climate challenges.
- Demand for simplification and reduced bureaucracy for SMEs.
Cronologia degli emendamenti (12)
Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.
Recital E (new)
Presentato da Hanna Gedin · The Left
Aggiunto: E. whereas the green and digital transitions require an update to single market rules in order to set the right conditions to achieve a fairer, more sustainable and digitally fit EU; whereas regulatory tools must be aligned with those policy objectives; whereas single market rules to boost competitiveness must not come at the expense of safe and good-quality jobs within the EU;
Paragraph 5
Presentato da Hanna Gedin · The Left
5.
Rimosso: WelcomesAggiunto: Stresses that the proposal for a regulation on a public interface connected to the … workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (COM/2024/531), which should lead toRimosso: simplification and strengthened enforcement; notes also that digitalisation could significantly reduce administrative burdens for cross-border services and ensure better access for businesses and consumers; calls, in this regard, for a single declaration portal and the digitalisation of A1 forms for cross-border services;Aggiunto: strengthened enforcement, must not lead to a decline in wages and working conditions and a race to the bottom;Paragraph 16
Presentato da Hanna Gedin · The Left
16. Considers that
Rimosso: the single market isAggiunto: State aid measures are a key tool in times ofRimosso: crisis if the Member States can act in a coordinated way;Aggiunto: crisis; highlights the key role that the relaxation of State aid rules played in keeping the EU single market afloat during the COVID-19 pandemic and during Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine; calls, therefore, for greater certainty and proactive measures in relaxing State aid rules for future crises that the Union may face, for the benefit of the single market; considers that the recently adopted Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Act2 will …Paragraph 29
Presentato da Hanna Gedin · The Left
… to protect consumers against greenwashing by establishing requirements for substantiation and verification; Aggiunto: stresses, against this background, the importance of maintaining and reinforcing sustainability laws such as the Green Claims Directive, the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive1a and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive1b; ______________ 1a OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj. 1b OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj.
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Presentato da Piotr Müller · ECR
Aggiunto: 2a. Highlights that ongoing barriers and political pressure to expand regulations have constrained the development of the single market, as noted in the Draghi report; calls for a shift towards a regulatory approach that empowers companies to grow, innovate and lead internationally, thereby restoring the single market as a true engine of growth and competitiveness;
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Presentato da Piotr Müller · ECR
Aggiunto: 2a. Highlights that ongoing barriers and political pressure to expand regulations have constrained the development of the single market, as noted in the Draghi report; calls for a shift towards a regulatory approach that empowers companies to grow, innovate and lead internationally, thereby restoring the single market as a true engine of growth and competitiveness;
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Presentato da Piotr Müller · ECR
Aggiunto: 21a. Stresses that the implementation of the DSA must fully respect freedom of expression; underlines that actions against illegal content must not restrict lawful speech and calls for proportionate and transparent enforcement to protect an open and democratic digital space;
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Presentato da Piotr Müller · ECR
Aggiunto: 21a. Stresses that the implementation of the DSA must fully respect freedom of expression; underlines that actions against illegal content must not restrict lawful speech and calls for proportionate and transparent enforcement to protect an open and democratic digital space;
Paragraph 35
Presentato da Piotr Müller · ECR
… for Ukraine’s gradual integration into the EU single market and sectoral programmes; Aggiunto: firmly opposes, however, any further liberalisation of trade with Ukraine beyond the current framework unless and until full alignment of production standards and regulatory requirements is achieved, particularly in the agricultural sector; stresses that any easing of customs duties or safeguard measures must remain strictly conditional on Ukraine meeting the EU’s rigorous standards and must be accompanied by clear guarantees of compensatory mechanisms, including subsidies, ensuring the protection and competitiveness of European producers operating within the EU; underlines that the Member States neighbouring Ukraine have been disproportionately affected by surging imports resulting from autonomous trade measures and must not bear the burden of unfair competition;
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Presentato da Klara Dostalova · PfE
Aggiunto: 15a. Stresses the need, in the current context of high inflation in the energy and food sectors, and as highlighted in the 2025 Consumer Conditions Scoreboard, to reduce the financial burden on consumers and businesses, particularly owing to the EU regulatory framework resulting from the European Green Deal; strongly calls for the adoption of targeted legislative measures to protect consumers and businesses against excessive energy costs and speculative manipulation;
Paragraph 24
Presentato da Klara Dostalova · PfE
… recent years; highlights the significance of Digital Product Passports in these processes; Aggiunto: urges the Commission to take legal action that would grant the Member States the discretion to impose fees on consignments in cases of heightened inflows from non-EU countries; calls, therefore, for a reinforced market surveillance framework and a revision of …
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Presentato da Klara Dostalova · PfE
Aggiunto: 37a. Emphasises that the exercise of simplification should not be limited to the anecdotal deletion of some excessive reporting requirements; calls on the Commission to put in place a real ‘SME test’ to conduct an in-depth assessment of the impact of recent and upcoming EU legislation on competitiveness, so as to identify and eliminate any redundant, excessive or contradictory regulatory requirements further burdening businesses; urges the Commission, in this regard, to present an ‘SME omnibus’ before the end of 2025;
Voto per gruppo politico
Come hanno votato i gruppi politici
- 5A favore
- 2Contro
- 7Astensione
- 15Non ha votato
- 96A favore
- 1Contro
- 4Astensione
- 87Non ha votato
- 75A favore
- 0Contro
- 3Astensione
- 58Non ha votato
- 32A favore
- 3Contro
- 19Astensione
- 26Non ha votato
- 42A favore
- 1Contro
- 0Astensione
- 10Non ha votato
- 54A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 21Non ha votato
- 2A favore
- 32Contro
- 21Astensione
- 30Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 19Contro
- 2Astensione
- 6Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 22Contro
- 1Astensione
- 23Non ha votato
Membri
Visualizzati 10 di 719
| Nome | Paese | Gruppo | Posizione di voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore |