Votazione al Parlamento europeo
Discarico 2023: bilancio generale dell'UE – Agenzie
Risultato complessivo
Approvata- 503 A favore
- 121 Contro
- 26 Astensione
- 69 Non ha votato
Come contiamo
- I voti Favorevoli, Contrari e Astensione provengono dal verbale di votazione nominale del Parlamento europeo.
- «Non ha votato» è derivato: deputati con mandato nel giorno della votazione per i quali non è stato registrato alcun voto. Le astensioni non contano per questo.
- Le successive correzioni di voto vengono mostrate ma non modificano il risultato ufficiale.
- Ogni votazione (votazione globale, emendamento, votazione parziale) conta separatamente. Per questo i totali possono differire da pagine che contano in modo diverso.
Stato e procedura
Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.
- Votazione del
- Ultima fase documentata
- Gazzetta ufficiale · (304 giorni fa)
- Prossima fase prevista
- Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
- Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale documentata
Svolgimento della procedura
2024/2030(DEC) · DEC
Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.
- Documentato: Deferimento
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Documentato: Plenaria
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Documentato: Plenaria
- Documentato: Altre attività
- Ultimo documentato: Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività documentate (37)
- Deferimento alla commissione
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Relazione della commissione presentata
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Relazione della commissione approvata
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
- Relazione della commissione presentata
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Relazione della commissione approvata
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Altra attività documentata
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
- Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:
Fonti
Dati: EP Open Data API
Di cosa si tratta?
- Discharge granted for 2023 budgets of all EU agencies.
- Audit by Court of Auditors on budget execution.
- Reporting by Budgetary Control Committee .
Cronologia degli emendamenti (13)
Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Anders Vistisen, Nikola Bartůšek +1 · PfE
Aggiunto: 8 a. In accordance with the principles of proportionality, efficiency, and fiscal responsibility, all Union Agencies established with a defined mandate shall be subject to automatic dissolution upon the completion of their original mission, unless a formal extension is explicitly justified and approved by both the European Parliament and the Council. The continuation of any agency beyond its founding objectives shall be considered an unjustified burden on Union resources, a contributor to institutional redundancy, and a deviation from sound governance practices. Agencies that no longer serve a unique and essential function within the Union framework shall be disbanded without delay. The Commission shall, on an annual basis, submit a detailed review of each agency's relevance, with a binding recommendation for sunset proceedings where appropriate. The persistence of agencies beyond their necessity fosters bureaucratic inertia, undermines public trust, and diverts critical funding away from emerging priorities. Therefore, the Union shall embed time-limited mandates, strict performance reviews, and automatic closure mechanisms in all agency founding regulations.
Paragraph 18
Presentato da Virginie Joron, Fabrice Leggeri, Nikola Bartůšek +2 · PfE
18.
Rimosso: Stresses that a balanced approach, combining effective border control with robust fundamental rights safeguards, is key to maintaining a secure Schengen area and a credible migration management framework for the Union; reiterates, therefore, the importance of structural and continuous fundamental rights training forAggiunto: Regrets and denounces the intrusion of the ideology of politically left-wing NGOs, supported by the Commission, which have imposed themselves in recent years, increasing the number of staff mandated to monitor fundamental rights and providing training in this area to Standing Corps officers (Frontex),Rimosso: ensuring their awareness of and compliance with relevant fundamental rights obligations and standards and with international human rights and humanitarian law8 ; stresses, moreover, the importance of reporting fundamental rights violations, when witnessing such violations, via the issuance of Serious Incident Reports (SIRs); 8 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52024DC0075 - part 3.Aggiunto: thus diverting the Frontex agency from – and sometimes even hindering – its core mission; regrets that expenditure on remuneration in 2023 for the Fundamental Rights Office (headquarters and monitors) amounted to as much as EUR 4 367 527 (+78 % in one year) and that expenditure related to fundamental rights activities amounted to EUR 105 083 in 2023 (up 21 % in one year);Paragraph 18 a (new)
Presentato da Virginie Joron, Fabrice Leggeri, Anders Vistisen +2 · PfE
Aggiunto: 18 a. reiterates that Frontex must focus on border surveillance of the Schengen area, fighting cross-border crime and assisting return operations, thus contributing to the protection of the people of Europe; calls for the redeployment of resources and the continued recruitment of the necessary frontline staff at the Union’s external borders and in hot spots, and for the number of administrative posts to be streamlined; deplores the fact that the overall return rate in the Union remains below 30 %, indicating that current initiatives remain insufficient in light of the scale of illegal migration flows; stresses the need for Frontex to further prioritise its return operations and to work closely with Member States to enhance the effectiveness of the return programmes; stresses the urgent need for the EUAA to help Member States take measures to prevent illegal immigration and to process returns efficiently; calls for the possibility of reviewing asylum applications in countries of origin and transit to be considered in order to avoid fuelling migration into the Union;
Paragraph 18 c (new)
Presentato da Julien Sanchez, Virginie Joron, Fabrice Leggeri · PfE
Aggiunto: 18 c. Deplores the fact that the EUAA has only recently taken steps to terminate its rental contracts for premises in Lesbos and Rome, which had been identified as irregular by the European Court of Auditors since 2014, and which still cost EUR 123 800 for the financial year 2023 alone; in view of the steady increase in irregular migration across Europe, regrets that the EUAA is considering creating more posts for fundamental rights monitors rather than combating illegal immigration;
Paragraph 21
Presentato da Virginie Joron, Anders Vistisen, Julien Sanchez · PfE
… expenses and a higher budget allocation derived from fees for specific projects; Aggiunto: deplores this increase for ACER, given that it was ineffective; criticises the fact that the response has not been up to task and has been affected by rising energy costs, the setting system for which does not protect consumers’ interests; 12 Working document III draft budget 2023, p. 24. 13 Working document …
Paragraph 102
Presentato da Virginie Joron, Anders Vistisen, Julien Sanchez · PfE
… between tenderers and to procure the most economically advantageous goods and services, Aggiunto: giving preference to European companies over non-European companies and respecting the principles of transparency, proportionality, equal treatment and non-discrimination;
Paragraph 17
Presentato da Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers, Beatrice Timgren +8 · ECR
… ways to simplify these processes to reduce unnecessary burdens on national authorities;
Rimosso: notes the importance of implementing recommendations from the Fundamental Rights Officer’s (FRO) annual report; while recognising the progress that has been made, calls on Frontex to continue to enhance transparency, fully cooperate with investigations and implement measures ensuring fundamental rights protections in all of its activities;7 Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council …Paragraph 18
Presentato da Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers, Beatrice Timgren +8 · ECR
18. Stresses
Rimosso: that a balanced approach, combining effective border control with robust fundamental rights safeguards, isAggiunto: the need for the agency to return to its core tasks which are key to maintaining a secure Schengen area and a credible migration management framework for the Union;Rimosso: reiterates, therefore, the importance of structural and continuous fundamental rights training for Standing Corps officers (Frontex), ensuring their awareness of and compliance with relevant fundamental rights obligations and standards and with international human rights and humanitarian law8 ; stresses, moreover, the importance of reporting fundamental rights violations, when witnessing such violations, via the issuance of Serious Incident Reports (SIRs); 8 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52024DC0075 - part 3.Paragraph 81
Presentato da Maciej Wąsik, Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers +5 · ECR
81.
Rimosso: WelcomesAggiunto: Notes FRA's contribution to the evaluation of the European Border and Coast Guard …Paragraph 85
Presentato da Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers, Beatrice Timgren +8 · ECR
85. Highlights as regards EIGE,
Rimosso: the importance of resuming actions related to the gender mainstreaming that did not achieve a 100 % success rate, particularly due to procedural reasons;Aggiunto: this Institution, rather than focusing on universally shared goals such as equal opportunity and protection under the law, continues to prioritise concepts like “gender identity,” “intersectionality,” and “structural patriarchy,” which represent ideological constructs rather than objective policy concerns; stresses that the EIGE operates as a vehicle for social engineering rather than a neutral agency promoting equality under Union law;Paragraph 108
Presentato da Maciej Wąsik, Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers +6 · ECR
108.
Rimosso: SupportsAggiunto: Notes Frontex’s continued efforts to strengthen its FRO,Rimosso: noting the employment of 46 Fundamental Rights Monitors (FRM) in 2023; stresses the importance of ensuring that all FRMs are recruited in AD grade, to further enhance their capacity and independence; recognises that Frontex has taken significant steps in responding to the opinions of the FRO, particularly on issues such as gender mainstreaming and human trafficking;Aggiunto: whose activities should not determine the implementation of Frontex's mandate, which is to help Members States in border protection, return of illigal migrants and secure of the Schengen area;Paragraph 142
Presentato da Maciej Wąsik, Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers +5 · ECR
142. Highlights the positive progress in implementing Fundamental Rights targets,
Rimosso: including the ongoing execution of the Fundamental Rights Action Plan and the independent evaluation of the Agency’s compliance with the Fundamental Rights Framework, in line with the EBCG Regulation; welcomes the proactive follow-up by Frontex on complaints related to fundamental rights, with the majority being dismissed for non-admissibility; welcomes Frontex’s reinforced commitment to transparency and accountability;Aggiunto: which, however, are not the main task expected by Member States in their requests for Frontex assistance at the borders; notes that the activities of FRO in Lithuania in 2021 determined the presence of Frontex and made the assistance ineffective in the face of hybrid threats from Belarus and Russia; stresses that, as a result, Lithuania, the victim of hybrid attack, has been accused of violating the fundamental rights of aggressive illegal migrants pushing their way across its borders;Paragraph 96
Presentato da Erik Marquardt · Greens/EFA
96.
Rimosso: Reiterates its call from last year that the EUAA should keep Parliament regularly updated on all OLAF investigations;Aggiunto: Urges the Agency to fully clarify all open issues, to implement OLAF recommendations in a credible and transparent manner, and to establish robust internal control, ethical oversight, and accountability mechanisms; calls on the Agency to inform the discharge authority about any remedial steps taken without undue delays;
Voto per gruppo politico
Come hanno votato i gruppi politici
- 5A favore
- 9Contro
- 9Astensione
- 7Non ha votato
- 172A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 16Non ha votato
- 55A favore
- 14Contro
- 6Astensione
- 5Non ha votato
- 120A favore
- 1Contro
- 0Astensione
- 15Non ha votato
- 37A favore
- 0Contro
- 3Astensione
- 6Non ha votato
- 48A favore
- 0Contro
- 1Astensione
- 4Non ha votato
- 66A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 9Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 76Contro
- 7Astensione
- 2Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 21Contro
- 0Astensione
- 5Non ha votato
Membri
Visualizzati 10 di 719
| Nome | Paese | Gruppo | Posizione di voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore |