Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Discarico 2023: bilancio generale dell'UE – Agenzie

Erik Marquardt – Proposta di risoluzione (insieme del testo)
Data: 07.05.2025·Riferimento: A10-0065/2025
Relatore: Erik Marquardt

Risultato complessivo

Approvata
  • 503 A favore
  • 121 Contro
  • 26 Astensione
  • 69 Non ha votato
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Gazzetta ufficiale · (304 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale documentata

Svolgimento della procedura

2024/2030(DEC) · DEC

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Deferimento38 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Esame in commissione171 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Documentato: Plenaria105 giorni alla fase successiva
  4. Documentato: Esame in commissione63 giorni alla fase successiva
  5. Documentato: Plenaria23 giorni alla fase successiva
  6. Documentato: Altre attività83 giorni alla fase successiva
  7. Ultimo documentato: Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività documentate (37)
  1. Deferimento alla commissione
  2. Parere della commissione presentato
  3. Parere della commissione presentato
  4. Parere della commissione presentato
  5. Parere della commissione presentato
  6. Parere della commissione presentato
  7. Parere della commissione presentato
  8. Parere della commissione presentato
  9. Relazione della commissione presentata
  10. Parere della commissione approvato
  11. Parere della commissione approvato
  12. Parere della commissione approvato
  13. Parere della commissione approvato
  14. Parere della commissione approvato
  15. Parere della commissione approvato
  16. Parere della commissione approvato
  17. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  18. Relazione della commissione approvata
  19. Presentazione in plenaria
  20. Presentazione in plenaria
  21. Presentazione in plenaria
  22. Presentazione in plenaria
  23. Presentazione in plenaria
  24. Presentazione in plenaria
  25. Presentazione in plenaria
  26. Discussione in plenaria
  27. Votazione in plenaria
  28. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
  29. Relazione della commissione presentata
  30. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  31. Relazione della commissione approvata
  32. Presentazione in plenaria
  33. Presentazione in plenaria
  34. Altra attività documentata
  35. Votazione in plenaria
  36. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
  37. Pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria
  3. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • Discharge granted for 2023 budgets of all EU agencies.
  • Audit by Court of Auditors on budget execution.
  • Reporting by Budgetary Control Committee .
Fonte: riassunto generato da IA con Mistral

Cronologia degli emendamenti (13)

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.

  1. Emendamento 12 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 8 a (new)

    Presentato da Tamás Deutsch, Anders Vistisen, Nikola Bartůšek +1 · PfE

    Aggiunto: 8 a. In accordance with the principles of proportionality, efficiency, and fiscal responsibility, all Union Agencies established with a defined mandate shall be subject to automatic dissolution upon the completion of their original mission, unless a formal extension is explicitly justified and approved by both the European Parliament and the Council. The continuation of any agency beyond its founding objectives shall be considered an unjustified burden on Union resources, a contributor to institutional redundancy, and a deviation from sound governance practices. Agencies that no longer serve a unique and essential function within the Union framework shall be disbanded without delay. The Commission shall, on an annual basis, submit a detailed review of each agency's relevance, with a binding recommendation for sunset proceedings where appropriate. The persistence of agencies beyond their necessity fosters bureaucratic inertia, undermines public trust, and diverts critical funding away from emerging priorities. Therefore, the Union shall embed time-limited mandates, strict performance reviews, and automatic closure mechanisms in all agency founding regulations.

  2. Emendamento 14 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 18

    Presentato da Virginie Joron, Fabrice Leggeri, Nikola Bartůšek +2 · PfE

    18. Rimosso: Stresses that a balanced approach, combining effective border control with robust fundamental rights safeguards, is key to maintaining a secure Schengen area and a credible migration management framework for the Union; reiterates, therefore, the importance of structural and continuous fundamental rights training for Aggiunto: Regrets and denounces the intrusion of the ideology of politically left-wing NGOs, supported by the Commission, which have imposed themselves in recent years, increasing the number of staff mandated to monitor fundamental rights and providing training in this area to Standing Corps officers (Frontex), Rimosso: ensuring their awareness of and compliance with relevant fundamental rights obligations and standards and with international human rights and humanitarian law8 ; stresses, moreover, the importance of reporting fundamental rights violations, when witnessing such violations, via the issuance of Serious Incident Reports (SIRs); 8 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52024DC0075 - part 3. Aggiunto: thus diverting the Frontex agency from – and sometimes even hindering – its core mission; regrets that expenditure on remuneration in 2023 for the Fundamental Rights Office (headquarters and monitors) amounted to as much as EUR 4 367 527 (+78 % in one year) and that expenditure related to fundamental rights activities amounted to EUR 105 083 in 2023 (up 21 % in one year);

  3. Emendamento 15 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 18 a (new)

    Presentato da Virginie Joron, Fabrice Leggeri, Anders Vistisen +2 · PfE

    Aggiunto: 18 a. reiterates that Frontex must focus on border surveillance of the Schengen area, fighting cross-border crime and assisting return operations, thus contributing to the protection of the people of Europe; calls for the redeployment of resources and the continued recruitment of the necessary frontline staff at the Union’s external borders and in hot spots, and for the number of administrative posts to be streamlined; deplores the fact that the overall return rate in the Union remains below 30 %, indicating that current initiatives remain insufficient in light of the scale of illegal migration flows; stresses the need for Frontex to further prioritise its return operations and to work closely with Member States to enhance the effectiveness of the return programmes; stresses the urgent need for the EUAA to help Member States take measures to prevent illegal immigration and to process returns efficiently; calls for the possibility of reviewing asylum applications in countries of origin and transit to be considered in order to avoid fuelling migration into the Union;

  4. Emendamento 17 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 18 c (new)

    Presentato da Julien Sanchez, Virginie Joron, Fabrice Leggeri · PfE

    Aggiunto: 18 c. Deplores the fact that the EUAA has only recently taken steps to terminate its rental contracts for premises in Lesbos and Rome, which had been identified as irregular by the European Court of Auditors since 2014, and which still cost EUR 123 800 for the financial year 2023 alone; in view of the steady increase in irregular migration across Europe, regrets that the EUAA is considering creating more posts for fundamental rights monitors rather than combating illegal immigration;

  5. Emendamento 18 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 21

    Presentato da Virginie Joron, Anders Vistisen, Julien Sanchez · PfE

    … expenses and a higher budget allocation derived from fees for specific projects; Aggiunto: deplores this increase for ACER, given that it was ineffective; criticises the fact that the response has not been up to task and has been affected by rising energy costs, the setting system for which does not protect consumers’ interests; 12 Working document III draft budget 2023, p. 24. 13 Working document …

  6. Emendamento 27 · Proposta di risoluzioneApprovata

    Paragraph 102

    Presentato da Virginie Joron, Anders Vistisen, Julien Sanchez · PfE

    … between tenderers and to procure the most economically advantageous goods and services, Aggiunto: giving preference to European companies over non-European companies and respecting the principles of transparency, proportionality, equal treatment and non-discrimination;

  7. Emendamento 30 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 17

    Presentato da Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers, Beatrice Timgren +8 · ECR

    … ways to simplify these processes to reduce unnecessary burdens on national authorities; Rimosso: notes the importance of implementing recommendations from the Fundamental Rights Officer’s (FRO) annual report; while recognising the progress that has been made, calls on Frontex to continue to enhance transparency, fully cooperate with investigations and implement measures ensuring fundamental rights protections in all of its activities; 7 Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council …

  8. Emendamento 31 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 18

    Presentato da Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers, Beatrice Timgren +8 · ECR

    18. Stresses Rimosso: that a balanced approach, combining effective border control with robust fundamental rights safeguards, is Aggiunto: the need for the agency to return to its core tasks which are key to maintaining a secure Schengen area and a credible migration management framework for the Union; Rimosso: reiterates, therefore, the importance of structural and continuous fundamental rights training for Standing Corps officers (Frontex), ensuring their awareness of and compliance with relevant fundamental rights obligations and standards and with international human rights and humanitarian law8 ; stresses, moreover, the importance of reporting fundamental rights violations, when witnessing such violations, via the issuance of Serious Incident Reports (SIRs); 8 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52024DC0075 - part 3.

  9. Emendamento 32 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 81

    Presentato da Maciej Wąsik, Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers +5 · ECR

    81. Rimosso: Welcomes Aggiunto: Notes FRA's contribution to the evaluation of the European Border and Coast Guard …

  10. Emendamento 33 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 85

    Presentato da Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers, Beatrice Timgren +8 · ECR

    85. Highlights as regards EIGE, Rimosso: the importance of resuming actions related to the gender mainstreaming that did not achieve a 100 % success rate, particularly due to procedural reasons; Aggiunto: this Institution, rather than focusing on universally shared goals such as equal opportunity and protection under the law, continues to prioritise concepts like “gender identity,” “intersectionality,” and “structural patriarchy,” which represent ideological constructs rather than objective policy concerns; stresses that the EIGE operates as a vehicle for social engineering rather than a neutral agency promoting equality under Union law;

  11. Emendamento 34 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 108

    Presentato da Maciej Wąsik, Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers +6 · ECR

    108. Rimosso: Supports Aggiunto: Notes Frontex’s continued efforts to strengthen its FRO, Rimosso: noting the employment of 46 Fundamental Rights Monitors (FRM) in 2023; stresses the importance of ensuring that all FRMs are recruited in AD grade, to further enhance their capacity and independence; recognises that Frontex has taken significant steps in responding to the opinions of the FRO, particularly on issues such as gender mainstreaming and human trafficking; Aggiunto: whose activities should not determine the implementation of Frontex's mandate, which is to help Members States in border protection, return of illigal migrants and secure of the Schengen area;

  12. Emendamento 35 · Proposta di risoluzioneRespinta

    Paragraph 142

    Presentato da Maciej Wąsik, Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers +5 · ECR

    142. Highlights the positive progress in implementing Fundamental Rights targets, Rimosso: including the ongoing execution of the Fundamental Rights Action Plan and the independent evaluation of the Agency’s compliance with the Fundamental Rights Framework, in line with the EBCG Regulation; welcomes the proactive follow-up by Frontex on complaints related to fundamental rights, with the majority being dismissed for non-admissibility; welcomes Frontex’s reinforced commitment to transparency and accountability; Aggiunto: which, however, are not the main task expected by Member States in their requests for Frontex assistance at the borders; notes that the activities of FRO in Lithuania in 2021 determined the presence of Frontex and made the assistance ineffective in the face of hybrid threats from Belarus and Russia; stresses that, as a result, Lithuania, the victim of hybrid attack, has been accused of violating the fundamental rights of aggressive illegal migrants pushing their way across its borders;

  13. Emendamento 36 · Proposta di risoluzioneApprovata

    Paragraph 96

    Presentato da Erik Marquardt · Greens/EFA

    96. Rimosso: Reiterates its call from last year that the EUAA should keep Parliament regularly updated on all OLAF investigations; Aggiunto: Urges the Agency to fully clarify all open issues, to implement OLAF recommendations in a credible and transparent manner, and to establish robust internal control, ethical oversight, and accountability mechanisms; calls on the Agency to inform the discharge authority about any remedial steps taken without undue delays;

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 719

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
CroaziaEPP
A favore
PoloniaECR
A favore
PoloniaEPP
A favore
PortogalloS&D
A favore
SpagnaEPP
A favore
DanimarcaGUE/NGL
A favore
GermaniaGreens/EFA
A favore
RomaniaECR
A favore
Paesi BassiEPP
A favore
PoloniaEPP
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en