Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Semestre europeo per il coordinamento delle politiche economiche 2025

Fernando Navarrete Rojas - Proposta di risoluzione (insieme del testo)
Data: 12.03.2025·Riferimento: A10-0022/2025
Relatore: Fernando Navarrete Rojas

Risultato complessivo

Approvata
  • 469 A favore
  • 162 Contro
  • 54 Astensione
  • 34 Non ha votato
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Plenaria · (624 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.

Svolgimento della procedura

2024/2112(INI) · INI

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Esame in commissione22 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Deferimento25 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Documentato: Esame in commissione45 giorni alla fase successiva
  4. Ultimo documentato: Plenaria624 giorni dall’inizio di questa fase
Attività documentate (13)
  1. Relazione della commissione presentata
  2. Parere della commissione presentato
  3. Deferimento alla commissione
  4. Emendamenti presentati in commissione
  5. Relazione della commissione approvata
  6. Presentazione in plenaria
  7. Presentazione in plenaria
  8. Presentazione in plenaria
  9. Presentazione in plenaria
  10. Presentazione in plenaria
  11. Discussione in plenaria
  12. Votazione in plenaria
  13. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • European Semester 2025 enhances economic policy coordination.
  • Revised fiscal governance framework in force since 2024 .
  • Debt ratios rise to 90 % in euro area by 2026 .
Fonte: riassunto generato da IA con Mistral

Cronologia degli emendamenti (16)

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.

  1. Emendamento 1Respinta

    Recital F a (new)

    Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left

    Aggiunto: Fa. whereas the 3 % deficit-to-GDP and 60 % debt-to-GDP reference values are arbitrary numbers invented in the early 1980s without a sound economic rationale; whereas the prevailing economic conditions at that time were significantly different from those prevailing today;

  2. Emendamento 2Respinta

    Recital P a (new)

    Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left

    Aggiunto: Pa. whereas country-specific recommendations in the framework of the European Semester tend to incentivise cuts in social services and social protection instead of promoting an increase in public revenue; whereas from the introduction of the European Semester in 2011 to the year 2018, the Commission recommended 63 times that governments cut spending on healthcare or privatise healthcare services;

  3. Emendamento 3Respinta

    Paragraph 4

    Presentato da Pasquale Tridico · The Left

    4. Highlights the fact that an Rimosso: integrated, coordinated, Aggiunto: integrated and coordinated industrial policy encompasses both targeted and horizontal Rimosso: industrial policy is vital to increase Aggiunto: measures; stresses its relevance for strategically boosting investments in the EU’s innovation capacity, while bolstering competitiveness and the Rimosso: integrity of the single market; Aggiunto: EU’s strategic autonomy; welcomes the European Investment Bank to play a crucial role in guiding the investments;

  4. Emendamento 4Respinta

    Paragraph 4 a (new)

    Presentato da Pasquale Tridico · The Left

    Aggiunto: 4a. Welcomes SURE-like funds that are subject to social and environmental conditionalities as an effective tool to mitigate job losses in crisis-hit industries, particularly the automotive sector; recalls that saving manufacturing jobs also means preventing the dispersion of competencies and capabilities needed to build a competitive and dynamic industrial system; recalls that public funds should serve as a driver for improving working conditions;

  5. Emendamento 5Respinta

    Paragraph 5 a (new)

    Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left

    Aggiunto: 5a. Recalls that failure to mitigate and adapt to climate change fast enough as a result of underinvestment or delayed investments will not only have catastrophic human consequences, but will also be much more costly in sheer economic terms, hence contradicting the very purpose of the fiscal rules, which is to support sound public finances;

  6. Emendamento 6Respinta

    Paragraph 9 a (new)

    Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left

    Aggiunto: 9a. Recalls that the International Monetary Fund, a long-time supporter of austerity and structural adjustments, acknowledges that fiscal consolidation is not effective, on average, at lowering debt-to-GDP ratios;

  7. Emendamento 7Respinta

    Paragraph 21 a (new)

    Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left

    Aggiunto: 21a. Regrets that the revised economic governance framework fails to enhance social progress and convergence and to foster the ecological transition; reiterates that instead of focusing on irrelevant economic indicators and pursuing endless debt and deficit reduction, EU economic governance should aim to eradicate poverty and inequalities, and provide a high level of social protection, qualitative public services and individual and collective well-being through fulfilling the essential needs of all citizens and ecological planification;

  8. Emendamento 8Respinta

    Paragraph 21 b (new)

    Presentato da Martin Schirdewan, Manon Aubry · The Left

    Aggiunto: 21b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to exclude future-oriented public investment, and in particular investment in social infrastructure such as non-profit housing, from the fiscal rules of the Stability and Growth Pact;

  9. Emendamento 9Respinta

    Paragraph 23 a (new)

    Presentato da Manon Aubry, Martin Schirdewan · The Left

    Aggiunto: 23a. Believes that instead of promoting harmful budgetary cuts and structural reforms in order to reach the debt and deficit targets prescribed by the Stability and Growth Pact, EU economic governance should favour and facilitate the collection, by Member States and at EU level, of additional resources through fair taxation, in particular taxes on the wealthiest and multinational companies, taxes on ecologically harmful products and services, the cancellation of ineffective and unfair tax and social contribution exemptions, and the fight against tax dodging and tax evasion by wealthy individuals and multinational companies;

  10. Emendamento 10Respinta

    Paragraph 23 b (new)

    Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left

    Aggiunto: 23b. Highlights that, in general, budgetary cuts justified to comply with the economic governance rules correspond to the cost of tax breaks and tax allowances granted to wealthy individuals and multinational corporations; notes that, for instance, in the specific case of France, the EUR 60 billion in budgetary cuts proposed by the French Government for the 2025 budget equate exactly to the annual cost of tax breaks and tax allowances granted to wealthy individuals and multinational corporations by the French Government since 2017;

  11. Emendamento 11Respinta

    Paragraph 31 a (new)

    Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left

    Aggiunto: 31a. Regrets that in order to comply with the revised economic governance rules, Member State governments, with France at the forefront, have committed in their national fiscal and budgetary plans to reducing public expenditure and to implementing structural reforms; deplores that these commitments have already, or will in the near future, translate into concrete measures deeply affecting the population, such as a reform of the pension system, a reform of the unemployment scheme, a decrease in healthcare reimbursements and job cuts in public administrations such as public education, leading to a general degradation of public services; warns that these economic policies aimed at complying with the objectives of the European Semester will have a harmful and long-lasting impact on citizens and on our collective capacity to cope with the ecological crisis, while at the same time failing to achieve the deficit and debt reduction for which they were intended;

  12. Emendamento 12Respinta

    Paragraph 35 a (new)

    Presentato da Manon Aubry, Martin Schirdewan · The Left

    Aggiunto: 35a. Notes that the President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, proposed a suspension of fiscal rules for defence investments; condemns the double standards that allow military spending to rise indefinitely while social and environmental expenditure continues to face budget cuts; calls for any modification of the fiscal framework to be democratically approved by Parliament; highlights the fact that fiscal rules were already suspended during the COVID-19 crisis and stresses that the need to amend this framework in every crisis demonstrates its long-term inadequacy;

  13. Emendamento 13Respinta

    Recital K a (new)

    Presentato da Giovanni Crosetto · ECR

    Aggiunto: Ka. whereas, in the context of the anticipated ReArm Europe plan, the President of the Commission indicated the intention to activate the national escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact to allow Member States to increase defence-related investments; whereas this announcement was made in response to escalating geopolitical tensions, in particular the ongoing Russian aggression against Ukraine and the need to enhance Member States’ defence capabilities; whereas fiscal flexibility is essential to enable all Member States to contribute effectively to European security while safeguarding economic stability and competitiveness;

  14. Emendamento 14Respinta

    Paragraph 35 a (new)

    Presentato da Giovanni Crosetto · ECR

    Aggiunto: 35a. Encourages the swift activation of the national escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact in order to provide Member States with the necessary fiscal flexibility to scale up defence investments without triggering excessive deficit procedures; underlines that reinforcing the Union’s security requires a structured approach to defence expenditure, ensuring targeted investments that strengthen industrial capacity and strategic autonomy;

  15. Emendamento 15Respinta

    Paragraph 3

    Presentato da Enikő Győri, Paolo Borchia, Jorge Martín Frías +1 · PfE

    3. Rimosso: Notes Aggiunto: Recalls the original objective of the European Semester, which was the coordination of budgetary and economic policies across the Union; regrets, in this regard, the Commission’s commitment Rimosso: to ensure that Aggiunto: over the years to continuously expand the original scope of the European Semester Rimosso: drives Aggiunto: in order to drive policy coordination for Rimosso: competitiveness, sustainability and social Rimosso: fairness, Aggiunto: fairness as well as the integration of the Rimosso: UN Aggiunto: United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the European Rimosso: pillar of social rights; notes that Aggiunto: Pillar of Social Rights; regrets that, despite its negative impact on the European economy, industry and competitiveness, the European Green Deal remains a core deliverable for the Commission;

  16. Emendamento 20Respinta

    Paragraph 41 a (new)

    Presentato da Enikő Győri, Paolo Borchia, Jorge Martín Frías +1 · PfE

    Aggiunto: 41a. Reiterates, in this regard, that CSRs must always remain within the remit of EU competences and should never use double standards;

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 719

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
BelgioRenew
A favore
CroaziaS&D
A favore
GermaniaS&D
A favore
MaltaS&D
A favore
IrlandaEPP
A favore
Paesi BassiGreens/EFA
A favore
PortogalloS&D
A favore
ItaliaECR
A favore
SpagnaEPP
A favore
IrlandaRenew
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en