Votazione al Parlamento europeo
Semestre europeo per il coordinamento delle politiche economiche 2025
Risultato complessivo
Approvata- 469 A favore
- 162 Contro
- 54 Astensione
- 34 Non ha votato
Come contiamo
- I voti Favorevoli, Contrari e Astensione provengono dal verbale di votazione nominale del Parlamento europeo.
- «Non ha votato» è derivato: deputati con mandato nel giorno della votazione per i quali non è stato registrato alcun voto. Le astensioni non contano per questo.
- Le successive correzioni di voto vengono mostrate ma non modificano il risultato ufficiale.
- Ogni votazione (votazione globale, emendamento, votazione parziale) conta separatamente. Per questo i totali possono differire da pagine che contano in modo diverso.
Stato e procedura
Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.
- Votazione del
- Ultima fase documentata
- Plenaria · (624 giorni fa)
- Prossima fase prevista
- Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
Svolgimento della procedura
2024/2112(INI) · INI
Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Documentato: Deferimento
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Ultimo documentato: Plenaria
Attività documentate (13)
- Relazione della commissione presentata
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Deferimento alla commissione
- Emendamenti presentati in commissione
- Relazione della commissione approvata
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:
Fonti
Dati: EP Open Data API
Di cosa si tratta?
- European Semester 2025 enhances economic policy coordination.
- Revised fiscal governance framework in force since 2024 .
- Debt ratios rise to 90 % in euro area by 2026 .
Cronologia degli emendamenti (16)
Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.
- Emendamento 1Respinta
Recital F a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: Fa. whereas the 3 % deficit-to-GDP and 60 % debt-to-GDP reference values are arbitrary numbers invented in the early 1980s without a sound economic rationale; whereas the prevailing economic conditions at that time were significantly different from those prevailing today;
- Emendamento 2Respinta
Recital P a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: Pa. whereas country-specific recommendations in the framework of the European Semester tend to incentivise cuts in social services and social protection instead of promoting an increase in public revenue; whereas from the introduction of the European Semester in 2011 to the year 2018, the Commission recommended 63 times that governments cut spending on healthcare or privatise healthcare services;
- Emendamento 3Respinta
Paragraph 4
Presentato da Pasquale Tridico · The Left
4. Highlights the fact that an
Rimosso: integrated, coordinated,Aggiunto: integrated and coordinated industrial policy encompasses both targeted and horizontalRimosso: industrial policy is vital to increaseAggiunto: measures; stresses its relevance for strategically boosting investments in the EU’s innovation capacity, while bolstering competitiveness and theRimosso: integrity of the single market;Aggiunto: EU’s strategic autonomy; welcomes the European Investment Bank to play a crucial role in guiding the investments; - Emendamento 4Respinta
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Presentato da Pasquale Tridico · The Left
Aggiunto: 4a. Welcomes SURE-like funds that are subject to social and environmental conditionalities as an effective tool to mitigate job losses in crisis-hit industries, particularly the automotive sector; recalls that saving manufacturing jobs also means preventing the dispersion of competencies and capabilities needed to build a competitive and dynamic industrial system; recalls that public funds should serve as a driver for improving working conditions;
- Emendamento 5Respinta
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: 5a. Recalls that failure to mitigate and adapt to climate change fast enough as a result of underinvestment or delayed investments will not only have catastrophic human consequences, but will also be much more costly in sheer economic terms, hence contradicting the very purpose of the fiscal rules, which is to support sound public finances;
- Emendamento 6Respinta
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: 9a. Recalls that the International Monetary Fund, a long-time supporter of austerity and structural adjustments, acknowledges that fiscal consolidation is not effective, on average, at lowering debt-to-GDP ratios;
- Emendamento 7Respinta
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: 21a. Regrets that the revised economic governance framework fails to enhance social progress and convergence and to foster the ecological transition; reiterates that instead of focusing on irrelevant economic indicators and pursuing endless debt and deficit reduction, EU economic governance should aim to eradicate poverty and inequalities, and provide a high level of social protection, qualitative public services and individual and collective well-being through fulfilling the essential needs of all citizens and ecological planification;
- Emendamento 8Respinta
Paragraph 21 b (new)
Presentato da Martin Schirdewan, Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: 21b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to exclude future-oriented public investment, and in particular investment in social infrastructure such as non-profit housing, from the fiscal rules of the Stability and Growth Pact;
- Emendamento 9Respinta
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Martin Schirdewan · The Left
Aggiunto: 23a. Believes that instead of promoting harmful budgetary cuts and structural reforms in order to reach the debt and deficit targets prescribed by the Stability and Growth Pact, EU economic governance should favour and facilitate the collection, by Member States and at EU level, of additional resources through fair taxation, in particular taxes on the wealthiest and multinational companies, taxes on ecologically harmful products and services, the cancellation of ineffective and unfair tax and social contribution exemptions, and the fight against tax dodging and tax evasion by wealthy individuals and multinational companies;
- Emendamento 10Respinta
Paragraph 23 b (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: 23b. Highlights that, in general, budgetary cuts justified to comply with the economic governance rules correspond to the cost of tax breaks and tax allowances granted to wealthy individuals and multinational corporations; notes that, for instance, in the specific case of France, the EUR 60 billion in budgetary cuts proposed by the French Government for the 2025 budget equate exactly to the annual cost of tax breaks and tax allowances granted to wealthy individuals and multinational corporations by the French Government since 2017;
- Emendamento 11Respinta
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: 31a. Regrets that in order to comply with the revised economic governance rules, Member State governments, with France at the forefront, have committed in their national fiscal and budgetary plans to reducing public expenditure and to implementing structural reforms; deplores that these commitments have already, or will in the near future, translate into concrete measures deeply affecting the population, such as a reform of the pension system, a reform of the unemployment scheme, a decrease in healthcare reimbursements and job cuts in public administrations such as public education, leading to a general degradation of public services; warns that these economic policies aimed at complying with the objectives of the European Semester will have a harmful and long-lasting impact on citizens and on our collective capacity to cope with the ecological crisis, while at the same time failing to achieve the deficit and debt reduction for which they were intended;
- Emendamento 12Respinta
Paragraph 35 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Martin Schirdewan · The Left
Aggiunto: 35a. Notes that the President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, proposed a suspension of fiscal rules for defence investments; condemns the double standards that allow military spending to rise indefinitely while social and environmental expenditure continues to face budget cuts; calls for any modification of the fiscal framework to be democratically approved by Parliament; highlights the fact that fiscal rules were already suspended during the COVID-19 crisis and stresses that the need to amend this framework in every crisis demonstrates its long-term inadequacy;
- Emendamento 13Respinta
Recital K a (new)
Presentato da Giovanni Crosetto · ECR
Aggiunto: Ka. whereas, in the context of the anticipated ReArm Europe plan, the President of the Commission indicated the intention to activate the national escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact to allow Member States to increase defence-related investments; whereas this announcement was made in response to escalating geopolitical tensions, in particular the ongoing Russian aggression against Ukraine and the need to enhance Member States’ defence capabilities; whereas fiscal flexibility is essential to enable all Member States to contribute effectively to European security while safeguarding economic stability and competitiveness;
- Emendamento 14Respinta
Paragraph 35 a (new)
Presentato da Giovanni Crosetto · ECR
Aggiunto: 35a. Encourages the swift activation of the national escape clause of the Stability and Growth Pact in order to provide Member States with the necessary fiscal flexibility to scale up defence investments without triggering excessive deficit procedures; underlines that reinforcing the Union’s security requires a structured approach to defence expenditure, ensuring targeted investments that strengthen industrial capacity and strategic autonomy;
- Emendamento 15Respinta
Paragraph 3
Presentato da Enikő Győri, Paolo Borchia, Jorge Martín Frías +1 · PfE
3.
Rimosso: NotesAggiunto: Recalls the original objective of the European Semester, which was the coordination of budgetary and economic policies across the Union; regrets, in this regard, the Commission’s commitmentRimosso: to ensure thatAggiunto: over the years to continuously expand the original scope of the European SemesterRimosso: drivesAggiunto: in order to drive policy coordination forRimosso: competitiveness,sustainability and socialRimosso: fairness,Aggiunto: fairness as well as the integration of theRimosso: UNAggiunto: United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the EuropeanRimosso: pillar of social rights; notes thatAggiunto: Pillar of Social Rights; regrets that, despite its negative impact on the European economy, industry and competitiveness, the European Green Deal remains a core deliverable for the Commission; - Emendamento 20Respinta
Paragraph 41 a (new)
Presentato da Enikő Győri, Paolo Borchia, Jorge Martín Frías +1 · PfE
Aggiunto: 41a. Reiterates, in this regard, that CSRs must always remain within the remit of EU competences and should never use double standards;
Voto per gruppo politico
Come hanno votato i gruppi politici
- 2A favore
- 18Contro
- 8Astensione
- 1Non ha votato
- 71A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 4Non ha votato
- 134A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 2Non ha votato
- 176A favore
- 0Contro
- 2Astensione
- 10Non ha votato
- 47A favore
- 1Contro
- 3Astensione
- 2Non ha votato
- 39A favore
- 5Contro
- 28Astensione
- 8Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 77Contro
- 6Astensione
- 3Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 23Contro
- 1Astensione
- 2Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 38Contro
- 6Astensione
- 2Non ha votato
Membri
Visualizzati 10 di 719
| Nome | Paese | Gruppo | Posizione di voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore |