Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Accordo tra il Parlamento europeo, il Consiglio europeo, il Consiglio, la Commissione europea, la Corte di giustizia dell'Unione europea, la Banca centrale europea, la Corte dei conti europea, il Comitato economico e sociale europeo e il Comitato europeo delle regioni che istituisce un organismo interistituzionale per le norme etiche riguardanti i membri delle istituzioni e degli organi consultivi di cui all'articolo 13 del trattato sull'Unione europea

Daniel Freund – Proposal for a decision (text as a whole)
Data: 25.04.2024·Riferimento: A9-0181/2024
Relatore: Daniel Freund

Risultato complessivo

Approvata
  • 301 A favore
  • 216 Contro
  • 23 Astensione
  • 165 Non ha votato
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Plenaria · (935 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.

Svolgimento della procedura

2024/2008(ACI) · ACI

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Esame in commissione21 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Deferimento12 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Documentato: Esame in commissioneFase successiva lo stesso giorno
  4. Ultimo documentato: Plenaria935 giorni dall’inizio di questa fase
Attività documentate (7)
  1. Relazione della commissione presentata
  2. Deferimento alla commissione
  3. Relazione della commissione approvata
  4. Presentazione in plenaria
  5. Discussione in plenaria
  6. Votazione in plenaria
  7. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Discussione in plenaria
  2. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Di cosa si tratta?

  • Establishment of an interinstitutional ethics body for EU bodies.
  • Aim: Enhance transparency and integrity in EU institutions.
  • Criticism of insufficient legal basis and power balance.
Fonte: riassunto generato da IA con Mistral

Cronologia degli emendamenti (10)

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.

  1. Emendamento 1 · Proposta di decisioneRespinta

    Paragraph 1 a (new)

    Presentato da Leila Chaibi, Manon Aubry, Nikolaj Villumsen +1 · The Left

    Aggiunto: 1a. Reiterates that negotiations on transparency and ethics must themselves be conducted with exemplary transparency; deeply regrets, in that regard, that all political groups were not represented in the negotiating team, as is usually done, and that no reporting from the negotiating team was done at any point throughout the whole inter-institutional negotiations;

  2. Emendamento 2 · Proposta di decisioneRespinta

    Paragraph 2 a (new)

    Presentato da Leila Chaibi, Manon Aubry, Nikolaj Villumsen +1 · The Left

    Aggiunto: 2a. Considers that Parliament should continue to improve its internal rules on ethics, based on the highest standards, in particular when it comes to the Advisory Committee on the Conduct of Members ; considers that the Advisory Committee should play a proactive role, including with the ability to act on its own initiative, deal with complaints directly and, most importantly, decide on sanctions;

  3. Emendamento 3 · Proposta di decisioneRespinta

    Paragraph 2 b (new)

    Presentato da Leila Chaibi, Manon Aubry, Nikolaj Villumsen · The Left

    Aggiunto: 2b. Calls for the establishment, at the start of the upcoming legislature, of a special committee dedicated to examining and improving applicable rules and enforcement mechanisms for the integrity of European institutions;

  4. Emendamento 4 · Proposta di decisioneRespinta

    Paragraph 7

    Presentato da Leila Chaibi, Manon Aubry, Nikolaj Villumsen +1 · The Left

    … and experience in high-level functions in European, national, or international public organisations; Aggiunto: considers that, in order to ensure the consistent application of ethical standards and predictability, advice by the experts should be binding;

  5. Emendamento 5 · Proposta di decisioneRespinta

    Paragraph 9 a (new)

    Presentato da Leila Chaibi, Manon Aubry, Nikolaj Villumsen +2 · The Left

    Aggiunto: 9a. Stresses that the European Parliament should lead by example; calls, in order to limit potential conflicts of interest, for a ban on Members of the European Parliament performing paid side jobs or activities on behalf of organisations or individuals covered by the scope of the Transparency Register, in particular as managers or consultants, or as members or directors of the boards of directors or advisory boards of publicly listed companies;

  6. Emendamento 6 · Proposta di decisioneRespinta

    Paragraph 9

    Presentato da Antonio Maria Rinaldi, Gerolf Annemans, Gilles Lebreton · ID

    9. Believes Rimosso: the body should rely on the existing powers of institutions to ask their members for information or on the agreement of national authorities to share information; believes that the independent experts should be able to exchange information with national authorities where necessary for the performance of their tasks, while treating such information with the same confidentiality as the originating authority did; stresses in this regard that the independent experts should have access to the administrative documents of participating parties, especially the party consulting them on a case, Aggiunto: that, in order to Rimosso: allow them to carry out well-reasoned and well-documented assessments; Aggiunto: prevent the repetition of episodes such as Qatargate, there is no need for an ethics body such as the one being proposed, but rather for the proper application of the Institution's internal rules and compliance with the law; recalls that, in any case, the conduct concerned was criminal and not merely "unethical" in nature and, therefore, the presence of an ethics body would not have prevented its occurrence; reiterates, for this reason, the need to establish a committee of inquiry to shed light on the political responsibilities resulting from the corruption affair and from the involvement of political figures in this Parliament;

  7. Emendamento 7 · Proposta di decisioneRespinta

    Paragraph 15

    Presentato da Antonio Maria Rinaldi, Gerolf Annemans, Gilles Lebreton · ID

    15. Rimosso: Recalls its position that the body should be able to investigate on its own initiative alleged breaches of ethical rules by officials and staff of EU institutions and to conduct on-the-spot and records-based investigations using the information that it has collected or that it has received from third parties; Aggiunto: Emphasises that safeguarding the independence of Parliament and parliamentarians is crucial, and something which a third-party body, called upon to set rules intended for the European Parliament and institutions in general, could jeopardise; believes that, as conceived, the Ethics Body represents more a new waste of public resources than real added value;

  8. Emendamento 81 · Allegato: AccordoRespinta

    Draft agreement – Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)

    Presentato da Sven Simon · PPE

    Aggiunto: (ba) the Members of the Council of the European Union, when acting in the exercise of their European mandate;

  9. Emendamento 84 · Proposta di decisioneRespinta

    Paragraph 16

    Presentato da Antonio Maria Rinaldi, Gerolf Annemans, Gilles Lebreton · ID

    16. Rimosso: Approves Aggiunto: Calls for a postponement of the conclusion of the Agreement Rimosso: annexed hereto; Aggiunto: to the next term, so that a new and more legitimised Parliament can take a decision on this;

  10. Emendamento 86 · Allegato: AccordoRespinta

    Article 1 – paragraph 1

    Presentato da Sven Simon · PPE

    Rimosso: 1. Aggiunto: 2. The European Parliament, Rimosso: the Council of the European Union, the European Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Union, the …

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 705

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
SveziaNI
A favore
GermaniaGreens/EFA
A favore
FranciaGreens/EFA
A favore
BulgariaRenew
A favore
SveziaS&D
A favore
LussemburgoRenew
A favore
SlovacchiaRenew
A favore
Paesi BassiRenew
A favore
RomaniaNI
A favore
RomaniaRenew
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en