Votazione al Parlamento europeo

Modifiche al regolamento del Parlamento recanti attuazione della riforma parlamentare "Parlamento 2024"

Salvatore De Meo - Après le § 56 - Am 120
Data: 10.04.2024·Riferimento: A9-0158/2024
Relatore: Salvatore De Meo

Risultato complessivo

Respinta
  • 155 A favore
  • 419 Contro
  • 38 Astensione
  • 93 Non ha votato
Emendamento— Stai visualizzando una votazione secondaria (emendamento) della votazione principale.Emendamento 120 · Presentato da Verts/ALEVedi l'emendamento al PE ↗
Testo dell’emendamento

Presentato da Damian Boeselager

Aggiunto: Rule 56a Budgetary assessment on proposals for legally binding acts with budgetary implications 1. Without prejudice to the application of Rule 48, where a proposal for a legally binding act has implications for the Union budget, that proposal shall be referred by the President to the committee responsible for budgetary issues. That committee shall then issue a budgetary assessment of the proposal if it deems it appropriate or if so requested by the committee responsible for the subject-matter. This paragraph is without prejudice to the possibility for the committee responsible for budgetary issues to be authorised to submit opinions pursuant to Rule 56 or to act jointly with one or more committees pursuant to Rule 58. 2. The committee responsible for the subject-matter shall set a deadline within which the budgetary assessment is to be provided. Any changes to the announced timetable shall be immediately communicated to the committee responsible for budgetary issues. The committee responsible for the subject-matter shall not adopt its report before that deadline has expired. 3. In the budgetary assessment, the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall examine whether the proposal for a legally binding act provides for sufficient financial and human resources, and evaluate the potential impact of the financing proposed on other Union programmes or policies. It shall also determine whether the proposal is compatible with the multiannual financial framework, the system of own resources and the corresponding interinstitutional agreement, as well as the budgetary principles as laid down in the Financial Regulation. Where applicable, the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall also determine whether the proposal is compatible with Parliament’s position on any proposal to amend or replace that framework, that system, that agreement or those principles. 4. The budgetary assessment shall consist of an evaluation of the aspects of the proposal for a legally-binding act referred to in paragraph 3. The budgetary assessment may, where appropriate, also contain amendments to that proposal covering exclusively those aspects referred to in paragraph 3. Amendments on those aspects by the committee responsible for the subject-matter shall be inadmissible. The budgetary assessment, including the amendments, shall be integrated into the report as such. 5. Where a budgetary assessment is provided, the committee responsible for the subject-matter and the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall cooperate throughout the procedure to ensure full consistency between policy and budgetary objectives. To this end, they shall invite each other’s rapporteurs to their discussions within Parliament relating to the proposal for a legally binding act, including to the meetings between the rapporteurs and shadow rapporteurs. 6. Where a budgetary assessment is provided, the negotiating team referred to in Rule 74(1) shall include the rapporteur from the committee responsible for budgetary issues who shall lead the negotiations on the issues referred to in paragraph 3. Where a budgetary assessment is not provided, the committee responsible for the subject-matter may ask the committee responsible for budgetary issues to provide assistance to the negotiating team referred to in Rule 74(1) in relation to the aspects referred to in paragraph 3 at any stage of the interinstitutional negotiations.

Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese. PE760.542

← Torna alla votazione principale
Stato e procedura

Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.

Votazione del
Ultima fase documentata
Plenaria · (963 giorni fa)
Prossima fase prevista
Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.

Svolgimento della procedura

2024/2000(REG) · REG

Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.

  1. Documentato: Esame in commissione3 giorni alla fase successiva
  2. Documentato: Deferimento44 giorni alla fase successiva
  3. Documentato: Esame in commissione5 giorni alla fase successiva
  4. Ultimo documentato: Plenaria963 giorni dall’inizio di questa fase
Attività documentate (6)
  1. Relazione della commissione presentata
  2. Deferimento alla commissione
  3. Relazione della commissione approvata
  4. Presentazione in plenaria
  5. Votazione in plenaria
  6. Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
  1. Votazione in plenaria

Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:

Fonti

Dati: EP Open Data API

Voto per gruppo politico

Come hanno votato i gruppi politici

Membri

Visualizzati 10 di 705

Posizione di voto
NomePaeseGruppoPosizione di voto
SveziaGreens/EFA
A favore
GermaniaGreens/EFA
A favore
GermaniaNI
A favore
GermaniaRenew
A favore
PoloniaEPP
A favore
FranciaGreens/EFA
A favore
FranciaEPP
Intenzione di votoControVoto espresso: a favore
BelgioNI
A favore
LituaniaEPP
A favore
GermaniaGreens/EFA
A favore
Mostra altro
Seguici su Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en