Votazione al Parlamento europeo
Semestre europeo per il coordinamento delle politiche economiche 2024
Data: 13.03.2024Riferimento: A9-0063/2024Risultato complessivo
Approvata- 420 A favore
- 123 Contro
- 41 Astensione
- 121 Non ha votato
Come contiamo
- I voti Favorevoli, Contrari e Astensione provengono dal verbale di votazione nominale del Parlamento europeo.
- «Non ha votato» è derivato: deputati con mandato nel giorno della votazione per i quali non è stato registrato alcun voto. Le astensioni non contano per questo.
- Le successive correzioni di voto vengono mostrate ma non modificano il risultato ufficiale.
- Ogni votazione (votazione globale, emendamento, votazione parziale) conta separatamente. Per questo i totali possono differire da pagine che contano in modo diverso.
Stato e procedura
Risultato registrato dal Parlamento europeo.
- Votazione del
- Ultima fase documentata
- Plenaria · (989 giorni fa)
- Prossima fase prevista
- Nella fonte non è prevista alcuna ulteriore fase.
Svolgimento della procedura
2023/2063(INI) · INI
Attività documentate della procedura. Non stabiliscono se una legge sia entrata in vigore.
- Documentato: Deferimento
- Documentato: Esame in commissione
- Ultimo documentato: Plenaria
Attività documentate (8)
- Deferimento alla commissione
- Relazione della commissione presentata
- Parere della commissione presentato
- Parere della commissione approvato
- Relazione della commissione approvata
- Presentazione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
- Risultati della votazione in plenaria
Attività previste (non confermano lo svolgimento)
- Discussione in plenaria
- Votazione in plenaria
Scheda della procedura (OEIL) · Dati del Parlamento europeo
Consultato il:
Fonti
Dati: EP Open Data API
Di cosa si tratta?
- Criticism of weak economic growth and high inflation.
- Demand for more public investment for green transition.
- Reform of EU economic framework for more flexibility.
Cronologia degli emendamenti (18)
Testo come pubblicato dal PE, in inglese.
- Emendamento 1Respinta
Recital A a (new)
Presentato da Marc Botenga · The Left
Aggiunto: Aa. whereas Belgium, as the country holding the presidency of the Council, could decide not to add to the Council’s formal agenda the approval and adoption of the revised economic governance rules;
- Emendamento 2Respinta
Recital H a (new)
Presentato da José Gusmão, Manon Aubry, Martin Schirdewan · The Left
Aggiunto: Ha. whereas the 3 % government deficit-to-GDP ratio and 60 % public debt-to-GDP ratio are arbitrary figures set without sound economic rationale, and, therefore, are not appropriate references to guide the economic policies of the Member States;
- Emendamento 3Respinta
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Presentato da Marc Botenga, Manon Aubry, José Gusmão +2 · The Left
Aggiunto: 9a. Calls on the Council and all Member States to reject the proposed revised economic governance rules, as their adoption would impose devastating austerity measures throughout the European Union;
- Emendamento 4Respinta
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Presentato da Marc Botenga, Manon Aubry, Martin Schirdewan +1 · The Left
Aggiunto: 11a. Calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal for the reform of the economic governance rules, as adoption of the revised rules would impose devastating austerity measures throughout the European Union;
- Emendamento 5Respinta
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: 17a. Deeply regrets the return to austerity resulting from the fiscal rules agreed in the economic governance review; warns that these new rules will entail a massive, unrealistic and unsustainable fiscal adjustment by some Member States to comply with the imposed debt and deficit reduction criteria; underlines that France, for example, could be required to make an adjustment of up to EUR 24 billion per year over four years or EUR 16 billion per year over seven years; emphasises that such a steep reduction in public expenditure will have terrible social consequences, as it will be enforced through a squeeze of public services, leading to their deterioration, through structural reforms that weaken workers’ rights and social protection, and through chronic underinvestment in critical collective and public infrastructures, in line with the general orientation of the European Union’s economic governance so far;
- Emendamento 6Respinta
Paragraph 17 b (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry · The Left
Aggiunto: 17b. Expresses its concern about measures taken by governments of some Member States to reduce debt-to-GDP and deficit-to-GDP ratios, even before the revised fiscal rules enter into force; takes the view that, for example, the EUR 10 billion budgetary cuts carried out by the French Government as a financial correction for 2024 are unacceptable; underlines that this correction entails, among other things, a cut of 11 000 school places in an already depleted education system and a dramatic setback for domestic thermal insulation projects, despite these being an essential element in reducing households’ energy bills and a key measure for lowering greenhouse gas emissions; is convinced that these examples epitomise the social and environmental regression that will occur, to a much greater extent, once the revised fiscal rules are in place;
- Emendamento 7Respinta
Paragraph 17 c (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Martin Schirdewan · The Left
Aggiunto: 17c. Is concerned that the revised economic governance framework will, without any doubt, result in hindering, delaying or lowering the ambition of investment in a fair, ecological transition, by putting a cap on investments or making them conditional on arbitrary and misguided fiscal targets; states that orienting the framework for coordinating European Union economic policies in this way is dangerous, totally disconnected from scientific reality and completely unfit to address the challenges ahead;
- Emendamento 8Respinta
Paragraph 17 d (new)
Presentato da Manon Aubry, Martin Schirdewan, Manu Pineda · The Left
Aggiunto: 17d. Proposes that, instead of promoting budgetary cuts and harmful structural reforms in the name of debt reduction, the European Union should establish an economic governance framework that favours and facilitates the collection by the European Union and Member States of additional resources through fair taxation, specifically, taxes on the wealthiest and on multinational companies, in particular on windfall profits, and taxes on environmentally harmful products and services, as well as facilitating the cancellation of ineffective and unfair exemptions to tax and social contributions and the combating of tax dodging and tax evasion by rich individuals and multinational companies;
- Emendamento 9Respinta
Paragraph 17 e (new)
Presentato da José Gusmão, Manon Aubry, Martin Schirdewan +1 · The Left
Aggiunto: 17e. Regrets that the revision of the European Union’s economic governance framework is based on a strategy of reducing public spending instead of finding new revenue sources, which implies a return to austerity; deplores the failure of the revision to ensure sufficient fiscal space to promote public investment in the green transition, public services and upward social convergence; warns that the new rules will require a massive, unrealistic and unsustainable fiscal adjustment by some Member States to comply with the imposed debt and deficit reduction criteria; underlines that even the IMF has acknowledged that fiscal consolidation, on average, does not reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio, which means that austerity fails to achieve its own objectives;
- Emendamento 10Respinta
Paragraph 17 f (new)
Presentato da José Gusmão, Manon Aubry, Manu Pineda · The Left
Aggiunto: 17f. Expresses its concern about measures taken by governments of some Member States to reduce debt-to-GDP and deficit-to-GDP ratios, even before the revised fiscal rules enter into force;
- Emendamento 11Respinta
Paragraph 17 g (new)
Presentato da José Gusmão, Manon Aubry, Martin Schirdewan +1 · The Left
Aggiunto: 17g. Regrets that the review of economic governance led to a set of transitionary band-aid measures that perpetuate the flaws of the current model while being unable to cope with the social and ecological challenges ahead; reaffirms that the coordination of economic policies in the EU should aim at eradicating poverty and inequalities, providing a high level of social protection and enhancing qualitative public services, individual and collective well-being through the fulfilment of the essential needs of all citizens and ecological long-term planning;
- Emendamento 12Respinta
Paragraph -1 (new)
Presentato da João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left
Aggiunto: -1. Considers that, as the current socio-economic state of affairs brings to the fore, the Stability and Growth Pact and the Economic Governance of the European Union undermine the ability of Member States to address social and economic problems and needs properly, whether cyclical or structural;
- Emendamento 13Respinta
Paragraph -1 a (new)
Presentato da João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left
Aggiunto: -1a. Calls for the repeal of the Stability and Growth Pact, the six-pack and two-pack economic governance legislation, the European Semester, the Fiscal Compact, and all mechanisms that restrict Member States’ room for manoeuvre when promoting public investment, financing public services and their social roles; calls for that pact to be replaced by a Social Progress and Employment Pact that has the following objectives: – respect for the sovereignty of each state, ensuring the conditions for its economic and social development in order to overcome structural deficits and improve its productive capacity; – combating unemployment and encouraging full employment, defending and contributing to strengthening labour and other social rights, safeguarding and promoting collective bargaining and eradicating precariousness; – promoting the defence and strengthening of public services and the social functions of states, particularly access to the right to health, education, social security, housing and culture; – effectively encouraging the achievement of the principles of economic, social and territorial cohesion and environmental sustainability;
- Emendamento 14Respinta
Paragraph –1 (new)
Presentato da Kira Marie PeterHansen · Verts/ALE
Aggiunto: –1. Expresses its concern at the euro area’s economic weakness, with clear risks of a recession; notes that Member States’ fiscal policy has already been restrictive in 2023 and 2024, with additional budget consolidation expected in line with the reformed fiscal rules;
- Emendamento 15Respinta
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Presentato da Kira Marie PeterHansen · Verts/ALE
Aggiunto: 12a. Notes that, in view of the unusually high investment needs, public investment will have to be increased to complement and accelerate private investment; points out that many Member States will face difficulties in significantly increasing national public investment, in view of the debt and deficit reduction requirements of the reformed EU fiscal rules; highlights the benefits of providing joint funding at EU level to reduce pressure on national budgets and to ensure that EU policy priorities are adequately funded everywhere;
- Emendamento 16Respinta
Paragraph 3
Presentato da Eugen Jurzyca · ECR
… accompanied with growth- and resilience-enhancing reforms; calls attention to the investments in Aggiunto: nuclear energy, renewables and energy efficiency that are needed to, among other things, make …
- Emendamento 17Respinta
Paragraph 12
Presentato da Eugen Jurzyca · ECR
12. Underlines the importance of private and Aggiunto: efficient public investment in the context of the economic recovery and in managing …
- Emendamento 18Respinta
Paragraph 15
Presentato da Eugen Jurzyca · ECR
… on the reform of the EU economic governance framework, which aims to Aggiunto: decrease public debt to sustainable levels as referenced in the Treaties, ensure the effective coordination of economic policies and the sustained convergence of …
Voto per gruppo politico
Come hanno votato i gruppi politici
- 120A favore
- 2Contro
- 0Astensione
- 18Non ha votato
- 84A favore
- 0Contro
- 0Astensione
- 18Non ha votato
- 150A favore
- 0Contro
- 1Astensione
- 27Non ha votato
- 39A favore
- 78Contro
- 24Astensione
- 42Non ha votato
- 27A favore
- 2Contro
- 0Astensione
- 4Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 10Contro
- 1Astensione
- 2Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 23Contro
- 0Astensione
- 2Non ha votato
- 0A favore
- 8Contro
- 15Astensione
- 8Non ha votato
Membri
Visualizzati 10 di 705
| Nome | Paese | Gruppo | Posizione di voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore | |||
A favore |