Vote au Parlement européen

Végétaux obtenus au moyen de certaines nouvelles techniques génomiques et les denrées alimentaires et aliments pour animaux qui en sont dérivés, et modification du règlement (UE) 2017/625

Jessica Polfjärd - Proposition de rejet de la position du Conseil - Am 17= 25=
Date: 17.06.2026·Référence: A10-0175/2026
Rapporteur: Jessica Polfjärd

Résultat global

Rejeté
  • 201 Pour
  • 431 Contre
  • 29 Abstention
  • 58 N'a pas voté
Statut et procédure

Résultat tel qu'enregistré par le Parlement européen.

Vote du
Dernière étape documentée
Journal officiel · (il y a 140 jours)
Prochaine étape prévue
Aucune autre étape n'est prévue dans la source.
Publication au Journal officiel documentée

Déroulement de la procédure

2023/0226(COD) · COD

Activités documentées de la procédure. Elles ne prouvent pas qu’une loi est entrée en vigueur.

  1. Documenté: Renvoi6 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  2. Documenté: Examen en commission96 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  3. Documenté: Plénière9 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  4. Documenté: Négociations77 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  5. Documenté: Plénière377 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  6. Documenté: Négociations267 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  7. Documenté: Examen en commission92 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  8. Documenté: Renvoi22 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  9. Documenté: Examen en commission24 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  10. Documenté: Plénière2 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  11. Documenté: SignatureÉtape suivante le même jour
  12. Documenté: Autres activités9 jours jusqu’à l’étape suivante
  13. Dernier documenté: Journal officiel
Activités documentées (32)
  1. Renvoi en commission
  2. Dépôt du rapport en commission
  3. Dépôt d’amendements en commission
  4. Dépôt d’amendements en commission
  5. Dépôt d’amendements en commission
  6. Dépôt d’amendements en commission
  7. Adoption de l’avis en commission
  8. Adoption du rapport en commission
  9. Dépôt en séance plénière
  10. Débat en séance plénière
  11. Texte amendé en séance plénière
  12. Renvoi en commission pour négociations interinstitutionnelles
  13. Vote en séance plénière
  14. Résultats du vote en séance plénière
  15. Position du Parlement en première lecture
  16. Vote en séance plénière
  17. Résultats du vote en séance plénière
  18. Négociations interinstitutionnelles
  19. Négociations interinstitutionnelles
  20. Négociations interinstitutionnelles
  21. Négociations interinstitutionnelles
  22. Accord provisoire approuvé en commission
  23. Renvoi en commission
  24. Dépôt d’amendements en commission
  25. Dépôt du rapport en commission
  26. Adoption du rapport en commission
  27. Dépôt en séance plénière
  28. Autre activité documentée
  29. Signature
  30. Vote en séance plénière
  31. Résultats du vote en séance plénière
  32. Publication au Journal officiel
Activités prévues (réalisation non confirmée)
  1. Débat en séance plénière
  2. Vote en séance plénière
  3. Vote en séance plénière
  4. Vote en séance plénière

Fiche de procédure (OEIL) · Données du Parlement européen
Consulté le:

Sources

Données : EP Open Data API

De quoi s’agit-il ?

  • Adoption du règlement sur les plantes génomiques après accord.
  • Mise en œuvre des nouvelles techniques génomiques dès 2026 .
  • Critique de la violation du principe de subsidiarité par les États membres.
Source : Résumé généré par IA avec Mistral

Historique des amendements (17)

Texte tel que publié par le PE, en anglais.

  1. Amendement 1Rejeté

    Recital 34

    Déposé par Christophe Clergeau · S&D

    … to ensure transparency as regards the use of category 1 NGT plant Supprimé: varieties in order Ajouté: varieties, to ensure that production chains that wish to remain free from NGT plants and NGT products can do Supprimé: so, Ajouté: so and thereby safeguard consumer trust. NGT plants that have obtained a declaration … should contain, inter alia, information on the techniques used to obtain the Supprimé: traits. Ajouté: traits as well as detection methods. For transparency reasons, the patent information and the licence declarations provided by …

  2. Amendement 6Rejeté

    Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)

    Déposé par Christophe Clergeau · S&D

    Ajouté: (da) methods for sampling (including references to existing official or standardised sampling methods), detection, identification and quantification of the category 1 NGT plant. In cases where it is not feasible to provide an analytical method that identifies and quantifies, if duly justified by the person intending to undertake such a deliberate release, the modalities to comply with analytical method performance requirements shall be adapted as specified in the implementing act adopted in accordance with Article 27, point (c);

  3. Amendement 7Rejeté

    Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

    Déposé par Christophe Clergeau · S&D

    Ajouté: (da) methods for sampling (including references to existing official or standardised sampling methods), detection, identification and quantification of the category 1 NGT plant. In cases where it is not feasible to provide an analytical method that identifies and quantifies, if duly justified by the person intending to undertake such a deliberate release, the modalities to comply with analytical method performance requirements shall be adapted as specified in the implementing act adopted in accordance with Article 27, point (c);

  4. Amendement 8Rejeté

    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)

    Déposé par Christophe Clergeau · S&D

    Ajouté: (da) methods for sampling, detection, identification and quantification as referred to in Article 6(3) and Article 7(2);

  5. Amendement 9Rejeté

    Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point c

    Déposé par Christophe Clergeau · S&D

    … arrangements for complying with analytical method performance requirements referred to in Article Ajouté: 6(3), point (da), Article 7(2), point (da), Article 14(1), point (l), and Article 20(2).

  6. Amendement 19Rejeté

    Recital 18 a (new)

    Déposé par Anja Hazekamp, Emma Fourreau, João Oliveira +5 · The Left

    Ajouté: (18a) The European Parliament has called for the Union and its Member States not to grant patents on biological material and to safeguard the freedom to operate and the breeders’ exemption for varieties. It should be ensured that breeders have full access to the genetic material of NGT plants, which by definition are not transgenic plants. Access to genetic materials can best be secured when the right of patent holders is exhausted in the hand of the breeder (breeder’s exemption). As current provisions in patent law do not provide for a full breeder’s exemption, it should be ensured that patents should not restrict the use of NGT plants by breeders and farmers. Hence, NGT plants should not be subject to patent legislation, but should for the protection of intellectual property solely be subject to the Community Plant Variety Rights (CPVR) system, as laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94, which allows the use of the breeder’s exemption. NGT plants, their derived seeds, their plant material, associated genetic material such as genes and gene sequences, and plant traits should therefore be excluded from patentability. The exclusion from patentability should be applied in a consistent manner across legislation. Furthermore, in order to avoid patents being granted or patent applications being submitted between the date of the entry into force of this Regulation and the application of its provisions, it should be ensured that plant material is excluded from patentability from the day of entry into force of this Regulation. For patents already granted or pending patent applications covering plant material, the effects of patents should be further limited. In addition, the Commission should assess and address, in the forthcoming study, how the broader problem of patents being granted, directly or indirectly, on plant material despite previous efforts to close loopholes, should be further addressed. The assessment should address in particular the role and impact of patents on breeders' and farmers' access to plant reproductive material, seed diversity and affordable prices, as well as on innovation and in particular on opportunities for SMEs. The report of the Commission should be accompanied by the appropriate legislative proposals in order to ensure further necessary adjustments are made to the intellectual property rights framework.

  7. Amendement 20Rejeté

    Recital 25 a (new)

    Déposé par Anja Hazekamp, Emma Fourreau, João Oliveira +5 · The Left

    Ajouté: (25a) Traceability requirements for food and feed produced from NGTs should be established to facilitate the accurate labelling of such products, in accordance with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed, so as to ensure that accurate information is available to operators and consumers to enable them to exercise their freedom of choice in an effective manner, as well as to enable control and verification of labelling claims. Requirements for food and feed produced from NGTs should be similar in order to avoid discontinuity of information in cases of change in end use.

  8. Amendement 23Rejeté

    Article 24 a (new)

    Déposé par Anja Hazekamp, Emma Fourreau, João Oliveira +5 · The Left

    Ajouté: Article24a Measures to avoid the unintended presence of category 2 NGT plants Member States shall take appropriate measures to avoid the unintended presence of category 2 NGT plants in products not subject to Directive 2001/18 or Regulation 1829/2003.

  9. Amendement 26Rejeté

    Recital 1 a (new)

    Déposé par Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: (1a) Allowing for new genomic techniques and their results to be patented risks giving multinational seed companies even more power over farmers’ access to seeds. In a context where large companies already have a monopoly on seeds and increasingly control natural resources, this would deprive farmers of all freedom of action by making them dependent on private companies. For this reason, patents on these products must be banned.

  10. Amendement 27Rejeté

    Recital 15 a (new)

    Déposé par Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: (15a) NGT plants with the potential to persist, reproduce or spread in the environment, within or beyond fields, should be evaluated with the highest level of scrutiny in respect of the impact of such plants on nature and the environment.

  11. Amendement 30Rejeté

    Recital 68 a (new)

    Déposé par Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: (68a) Effective traceability, labelling and environmental monitoring rely on the availability of reliable, accurate and validated detection methods capable of identifying and quantifying relevant substances, organisms or products. The development and use of appropriate detection methods, including those enabled by NGTs, are therefore essential to ensure transparency, consumer confidence and the effective implementation of Union law.

  12. Amendement 31Rejeté

    Article 4 a (new)

    Déposé par Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: Article 4a Exclusion from patentability NGT plants, plant material, parts thereof, genetic information and the process features they contain shall not be patentable.

  13. Amendement 32Rejeté

    Article 10 – paragraph 1

    Déposé par Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    1. Supprimé: Plant Ajouté: Category 1 NGT plants, products containing or consisting of category 1 NGT plant(s) plant reproductive material, including for breeding and scientific purposes, that contains or consists … payment or free of charge, shall bear a label with the indication Supprimé: ‘NGT-1’, Ajouté: ‘New Genomic Techniques’. In the case of plant reproductive material, it shall be followed by the identification numbers of the NGT plants it has been …

  14. Amendement 33Rejeté

    Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)

    Déposé par Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: 1a. Appropriate document-based traceability for NGTs shall be provided by the transmission and holding of information that products contain or consist of NGT plants and product, and the unique codes for those NGTs, at each stage of their placing on the market.

  15. Amendement 34Rejeté

    Article 11 a (new)

    Déposé par Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: Article11a Withdrawal of the decision If the monitoring results show that there is a risk to health or the environment, or if new scientific data supports that hypothesis, the competent authority may withdraw its decision referred to in Article 6(8) or statement referred to in Article 7(5). The withdrawal decision must be sent by registered mail to the beneficiary of the decision, who shall have 15 days in which to make observations. In that case, the marketing of the NGT plant or product shall be prohibited from the day following the date of receipt of the registered letter.

  16. Amendement 36Rejeté

    Article 37 a (new)

    Déposé par Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: Article37a Amendments to Directive 98/44/EC 1. Article 4 of Directive 98/44/EC1a on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions is amended as follows: (a) In paragraph 1, the following points are added: ‘(ba) NGT plants, plant material, parts thereof, genetic information and process features they contain, as defined in Regulation (EU) .../... [O.J. please insert the number of this Regulation]; (bb) plants, plant material, parts thereof, genetic information and process features they contain that can be yielded by techniques excluded from the scope of Directive 2001/18/EC as listed in Annex I B to that directive.’ (b) the following paragraph is added: ‘3a. Paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be without prejudice to the exclusions from patentability covered in paragraph 1.’ 2. In Article 8, the following paragraph is added: ‘2a. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, the protection conferred by a patent on a biological material possessing specific characteristics as a result of the invention shall not extend to biological material possessing the same characteristics that is obtained independently of the patented biological material and from essentially biological processes, or to biological material obtained from such material through propagation or multiplication.’ 3. In Article 9, the following paragraphs are added: ‘1a. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, a plant product containing or consisting of genetic information obtained by a patentable technical process shall not be patentable if it is not distinguishable from plant products containing or consisting of the same genetic information obtained by an essentially biological process. 1b. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the protection conferred by a patent on a product containing or consisting of genetic information shall not extend to plant material in which the product is incorporated and in which the genetic information is contained and performs its function but which is not distinguishable from plant material obtained or which can be obtained by an essentially biological process. 1c. The protection conferred by a patent on a technical process that enables the production of a product containing or consisting of genetic information shall not extend to plant material in which the product is incorporated and in which the genetic information is contained and performs its function but which is not distinguishable from plant material obtained or which can be obtained by an essentially biological process.’ 1a Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions (OJ L 213, 30.7.1998, p. 13).

  17. Amendement 37Rejeté

    Annex II – point 2 a (new)

    Déposé par Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Ajouté: (2a) Potential to persist, reproduce or spread in the environment, within or beyond fields

Vote par groupe politique

Comment les groupes politiques ont voté

Les membres

Montrer 10 de 719

Position de vote
NomPaysGroupePosition de vote
SlovénieGreens/EFA
Pour
PortugalGUE/NGL
Pour
BelgiqueS&D
Pour
CroatieGreens/EFA
Pour
AllemagneS&D
Pour
AllemagneESN
Pour
AllemagneS&D
Pour
AllemagneS&D
Pour
PologneECR
Pour
SlovaquieNI
Pour
Afficher plus
Suivez-nous sur Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en