Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Refuerzo de la cooperación para el desarrollo para abordar los movimientos de población irregulares y sus causas profundas en países socios

Lukas Mandl - Propuesta de Resolución (conjunto del texto)
Fecha: 16.06.2026·Referencia: A10-0147/2026
Ponente: Lukas Mandl

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 344 A favor
  • 237 En contra
  • 66 Abstención
  • 72 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 179 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2025/2111(INI) · INI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión124 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión209 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Último documentado: Pleno179 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (11)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  4. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  5. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  6. Presentación al pleno
  7. Presentación al pleno
  8. Presentación al pleno
  9. Presentación al pleno
  10. Votación en el pleno
  11. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Cooperación al desarrollo para combatir migración irregular y causas raíz.
  • Enfoque en derechos humanos , estabilidad y desarrollo sostenible en países socios.
  • Fortalecimiento del enfoque „Team Europe“ para políticas migratorias coherentes.
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (8)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 4Aprobada

    Paragraph 18 a (new)

    Presentada por Lena Düpont, Andrea Wechsler, Tomáš Zdechovský +81 · Members

    Añadido: 18a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen their capacity to prevent and respond to the instrumentalisation of migrants; stresses the need for enhanced cooperation with partner countries and relevant agencies to detect, prevent and counter such actions;

  2. Enmienda 6Rechazada

    Recital Q

    Presentada por Mieke Andriese, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +80 · Members

    … for irregular migration by promoting stability, security and self-sufficiency in partner countries; Añadido: whereas the primary objective of development cooperation should be to enable people to live in dignity in their own countries, by supporting local employment, access to water and energy, education, industrial development, food security and resilient public services, rather than by facilitating their departure to the EU;

  3. Enmienda 7Rechazada

    Recital AI a (new)

    Presentada por Mieke Andriese, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +80 · Members

    Añadido: AIa. whereas development cooperation is not an end in itself, and the Commission should ensure that EU funding, which derives from European taxpayers, should primarily serve the needs, interests and well-being of the citizens of the Member States; whereas the Commission must ensure sound financial management and the protection of the financial interest of European citizens; whereas the Member States are expected to abide by the principle of national priorities in managing public resources, ensuring that obligations towards their own citizens prevail over any other allocation of public expenditure;

  4. Enmienda 8Rechazada

    Recital AJ

    Presentada por Mieke Andriese, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +79 · Members

    AJ. whereas migration Eliminado: can contribute to sustainable development and inclusive growth both in countries of origin and in destination countries, as well as within and across regions; whereas migration has an economic impact both on the country of destination and the country of origin; whereas this impact may be seen in migrants’ contribution to the public finances, employment and job creation, as well as in the role of diaspora communities in supporting the economic development of their countries of origin; Añadido: generates serious economic, social and demographic costs for countries of origin, in particular through the loss of working-age populations, skilled workers, students, entrepreneurs and professionals; whereas large-scale emigration accelerates brain drain and deprives partner countries of the human capital required for their own stability, industrialisation and long-term prosperity; whereas development cooperation must not be used as an instrument to organise the permanent transfer of human capital from partner countries to the EU; whereas cooperation with third countries should instead aim to anchor populations locally, strengthen domestic opportunities and reduce the economic, social and security incentives for irregular departures;

  5. Enmienda 9Rechazada

    Paragraph 1 a (new)

    Presentada por Mieke Andriese, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +80 · Members

    Añadido: 1a. Recalls that development cooperation is neither an end in itself nor an unconditional obligation to transfer resources; stresses that all EU external funding should primarily contribute to and complement the needs, interests and national priorities of the Member States, strengthen the security of citizens and enhance the protection of the EU’s external borders, and deliver concrete, measurable and verifiable results; rejects any approach that disconnects development assistance from the effective cooperation of beneficiary countries in preventing irregular immigration, ensuring border control, combating migrant smuggling networks and accepting return and readmission procedures;

  6. Enmienda 10Rechazada

    Paragraph 15

    Presentada por Mieke Andriese, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +80 · Members

    … the prevention of the exploitation of migrants by criminal networks and migrant Eliminado: smugglers, as well as by providing safer alternatives through the creation of legal channels for safe and regular migration and labour mobility; underlines that strict border control without alternative legal pathways for migration shifts migration routes, introducing different steps into the journey and new transit countries, thus increasing the precariousness of the journey and the exposure of migrants to smuggling networks, extortion and violence; Añadido: smugglers; condemns any collaboration, whether direct or indirect, with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) or other organisations related to human trafficking networks, notably those that facilitate smuggling operations in international waters far away from European coasts or disseminate information enabling migrants to circumvent Member States’ immigration laws;

  7. Enmienda 11Rechazada

    Paragraph 25 a (new)

    Presentada por Mieke Andriese, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +80 · Members

    Añadido: 25a. Strongly rejects any approach under which development cooperation would become an instrument for addressing demographic decline or labour shortages in the EU by recruiting the young and skilled workforce of partner countries;

  8. Enmienda 12Rechazada

    Paragraph 33 a (new)

    Presentada por Mieke Andriese, Mathilde Androuët, Gerolf Annemans +80 · Members

    Añadido: 33a. Calls on the Commission to make development support for partner countries strictly conditional on effective cooperation on combating mass migration, including the prevention of irregular departures, consular identification, the issuing of travel documents, the systematic acceptance of returns and readmissions, and the fight against trafficking and smuggling networks; stresses that EU funding should be regularly assessed; calls on the Commission to systematically apply mechanisms for the suspension, reduction or reallocation of funding in such circumstances;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 719

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
PortugalS&D
A favor
FranciaS&D
A favor
Países BajosRenew
A favor
AlemaniaRenew
A favor
EspañaS&D
A favor
GreciaEPP
A favor
Países BajosS&D
A favor
FranciaRenew
A favor
IrlandaRenew
A favor
PortugalRenew
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en