Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Refuerzo de la posición de los agricultores en la cadena de suministro alimentario

Céline Imart - Propuesta de la Comisión
Fecha: 08.10.2025·Referencia: A10-0161/2025
Ponente: Céline Imart

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 532 A favor
  • 78 En contra
  • 25 Abstención
  • 84 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Diario Oficial · (hace 107 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Publicación en el Diario Oficial documentada

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2024/0319(COD) · COD

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión71 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión164 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Documentado: Pleno26 días hasta el siguiente paso
  4. Documentado: Negociaciones182 días hasta el siguiente paso
  5. Documentado: Examen en comisión63 días hasta el siguiente paso
  6. Documentado: Pleno28 días hasta el siguiente paso
  7. Documentado: Firma21 días hasta el siguiente paso
  8. Último documentado: Diario Oficial
Actividades documentadas (29)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  4. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  5. Presentación al pleno
  6. Presentación al pleno
  7. Presentación al pleno
  8. Presentación al pleno
  9. Presentación al pleno
  10. Presentación al pleno
  11. Presentación al pleno
  12. Presentación al pleno
  13. Presentación al pleno
  14. Debate en el pleno
  15. Texto modificado en el pleno
  16. Remitido de nuevo a comisión para negociaciones interinstitucionales
  17. Votación en el pleno
  18. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
  19. Negociaciones interinstitucionales
  20. Negociaciones interinstitucionales
  21. Negociaciones interinstitucionales
  22. Negociaciones interinstitucionales
  23. Acuerdo provisional aprobado en comisión
  24. Presentación al pleno
  25. Posición del Parlamento en primera lectura
  26. Votación en el pleno
  27. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
  28. Firma
  29. Publicación en el Diario Oficial
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Debate en el pleno
  2. Votación en el pleno
  3. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Fortalecimiento de la posición de los agricultores en la cadena alimentaria.
  • Enfoque en transparencia y precios justos en toda la cadena.
  • Promoción de organizaciones de productores y cooperativas como actores clave.
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (18)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 121Rechazada

    Recital 3 a (new)

    Presentada por Manon Aubry, Arash Saeidi, Marina Mesure · The Left

    Añadido: (3 a) It is important to stress the contradiction between, on the one hand, trade agreements with Mercosur and the United States, which boost imports into the EU of food and agricultural products and fuel unfair competition, and, on the other hand, the urgent need to strengthen food sovereignty and safeguard European farmers by guaranteeing fair prices and a fair distribution of added value in the supply chain. The European Parliament should therefore reject the trade agreements with Mercosur and the United States.

  2. Enmienda 123Aprobada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1

    Presentada por Cristina Maestre, Dario Nardella, Stefano Bonaccini +39 · Members

    Añadido: (-1) Article 75 is amended as follows: (a) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. Marketing standards may apply to one or more of the sectors defined in Article 1 of this Regulation."; (b) in paragraph 3, point (j) is replaced by the following: "(j) the place of farming and origin;"

  3. Enmienda 124Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2

    Presentada por Barry Cowen · Renew

    … the rules and decisions provided for in, or derived from, these statutes Eliminado: contain provisions having similar effects to the provisions set out in paragraph 4; Añadido: allow for democratic scrutiny and include fair contractual terms;

  4. Enmienda 125Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2

    Presentada por Barry Cowen · Renew

    Añadido: (c a) the delivery concerns milk or milk products for which the Member State considers, following consultation of relevant representatives of farmers or of interbranch organisations recognised in accordance with Article 163(1), that the objectives pursued by the provisions set out in paragraphs 1 and 4 have been achieved for the products concerned or that the obligation to have written contracts or written offers would not be appropriate or proportionate as regards these products for other justified reasons.

  5. Enmienda 131Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2

    Presentada por Norbert Lins, Christine Singer, Niclas Herbst +46 · Members

    Eliminado: Every delivery in the Union Añadido: A Member State may decide that, every delivery on its territory of milk and milk products by a farmer, a producer organisation or …

  6. Enmienda 132Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2

    Presentada por Norbert Lins, Christine Singer, Niclas Herbst +44 · Members

    (i) the price payable for the delivery, which Eliminado: shall: Añadido: may:

  7. Enmienda 133Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2

    Presentada por Norbert Lins, Christine Singer, Niclas Herbst +44 · Members

    … of calculation of the final price, that are easily accessible and comprehensible Eliminado: and that reflect changes in market conditions and production costs, the quantities delivered and the quality or composition of the milk and milk products delivered. To that effect, Member States may determine indicators, in accordance with objective criteria based on studies carried out on production and the food supply chain. The parties to the contracts shall be free to refer to these indicators or any other indicators;

  8. Enmienda 135Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2

    Presentada por Norbert Lins, Christine Singer, Niclas Herbst +42 · Members

    … cooperative to the producer organisation or cooperative of which it is a Eliminado: member provided that the statutes of that producer organisation or cooperative or the rules and decisions provided for in, or derived from, these statutes contain provisions having similar effects to the provisions set out in paragraph 4; Añadido: member;

  9. Enmienda 137Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6

    Presentada por Norbert Lins, Christine Singer, Niclas Herbst +44 · Members

    Eliminado: Every delivery in the Union Añadido: A Member State may decide that, every delivery on its territory of agricultural products from a sector listed in Article 1(2), other than …

  10. Enmienda 138Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6

    Presentada por Norbert Lins, Christine Singer, Niclas Herbst +44 · Members

    (i) the price payable for the delivery, which Eliminado: shall: Añadido: may:

  11. Enmienda 139Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6

    Presentada por Norbert Lins, Christine Singer, Niclas Herbst +45 · Members

    … of calculation of the final price, that are easily accessible and comprehensible Eliminado: and that reflect changes in market conditions and production costs, the quantities delivered and the quality or composition of the agricultural products delivered; to that effect, Member States may determine indicators, in accordance with objective criteria based on studies carried out on production and the food supply chain. The parties to the contracts shall be free to refer to these indicators or any other indicators which they deem relevant.

  12. Enmienda 141Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6

    Presentada por Norbert Lins, Christine Singer, Niclas Herbst +41 · Members

    … cooperative to the producer organisation or cooperative of which they are a Eliminado: member provided that the statutes of that producer organisation or cooperative or the rules and decisions provided for in, or derived from, these statutes contain provisions having similar effects to the provisions set out in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 4; Añadido: member;

  13. Enmienda 143Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

    Presentada por Anna Strolenberg · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: 2 a. The use of the optional terms under this article shall be subject to a certification scheme as defined in Article 1(1)(b)(r) of Directive 2024/8251a 1a Directive (EU) 2024/825 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 February 2024 amending Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU as regards empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and through better information

  14. Enmienda 144Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2

    Presentada por Anna Strolenberg · Verts/ALE

    … for in, or derived from, these statutes contain provisions having similar effects Añadido: and objectives to the provisions set out in paragraph Eliminado: 4; Añadido: 4, and enable producer prices to be scrutinised democratically by members;

  15. Enmienda 145Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6

    Presentada por Anna Strolenberg · Verts/ALE

    … for in, or derived from, these statutes contain provisions having similar effects Añadido: and objectives to the provisions set out in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph Eliminado: 4; Añadido: 4, and enable producer prices to be scrutinised democratically by members;

  16. Enmienda 146Rechazada

    Recital 15

    Presentada por Anna Strolenberg · Verts/ALE

    … a processor, distributor or retailer should be covered by a written contract. Añadido: The content of those written contracts should also be improved, to integrate relevant factors including production cost and market conditions, in order that farmers consistently receive a price covering their production costs.

  17. Enmienda 147Aprobada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)

    Presentada por Céline Imart, François-Xavier Bellamy, Laurent Castillo +49 · Members

    Añadido: (7 a) Article 210b is added as follows : Member States shall ensure that supply contracts awarded under public procurement procedures are sourced from agricultural and food products originating in the Union, in particular with local and seasonal products, with the aim of enhancing the quality, sustainability and food safety of European agricultural products. Products benefiting from protected geographical indications, protected designations of origin and traditional specialities guaranteed shall be given priority in the implementation of these actions. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts, laying down the conditions for the application of this Article, ensuring compliance with Union rules.

  18. Enmienda 148Rechazada

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1

    Presentada por Eric Sargiacomo, Murielle Laurent, Nora Mebarek +60 · Members

    (b) a price considered equitable Eliminado: by participating farmers for their products, and Añadido: and remunerative by a certification body or guarantee system on the basis of transparent and verifiable methodologies provided by, for instance, the EU Agri-Food Supply Chain Observatory (AFCO) or other relevant actors for the matter concerning EU and non EU productions, and

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 719

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
FinlandiaS&D
A favor
EspañaS&D
A favor
LuxemburgoEPP
A favor
CroaciaEPP
A favor
PortugalEPP
A favor
PoloniaEPP
A favor
PoloniaEPP
A favor
IrlandaGUE/NGL
Voto previstoEn contraVoto emitido: A favor
FranciaPfE
A favor
RumaníaEPP
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en